User talk:DEH100

November 2022

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. [1] MrOllie (talk) 16:07, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. MrOllie (talk) 12:36, 28 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

April 2024

Your account has been indefinitely blocked from editing because your account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. Also, your username gives the impression that the account represents a business, organisation, group, or web site, which is against the username policy.

If you intend to make useful contributions instead of promoting your business or organization, you may request unblock and a username change. In your reasons, you must:

Disclose any compensation you may receive for your contributions in accordance with the paid-contribution disclosure requirement; and
Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked; and
Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked; and
Provide a new username.

To do this, post the text {{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with your new username and replace the text "Your reason here" with your reasons to be unblocked.

Please note that the new username you choose cannot already be taken and in use by another account. You can go here to search and see if the username you'd like to choose is available. If the search returns that no global account with that username exists, that means it is available to be taken.

Appeals: If, after reviewing the guide to appealing blocks, you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal it by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your reason here" with the reasons you believe the block was an error, and publish the page. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 15:33, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I don`t understand the article I was writing was in the sandbox, so surely it isn`t published? I also asked for comments on what was written and there were no links. Also I am writing about a significant Swiss simulation software. My user name is my initials. Seems a little off to block me. DEH100 (talk) 06:10, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please unblock my account for the following reasons:

{{unblock-spamun|DE Hooper|My existing username appears spammy according to HJ Mitchell}}

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

DEH100 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I don´t receive any compensation :I understand the reason I was blocked, I intended the article to be in draft form to allow other editors to comment so I wouldn´t fall fowl of the rules, however it seems my article was live. :I wish to contribute to the areas of OLED and Solar Cell Research and Development a this is what I know about and help improve the Swiss Wikipedia page DEH100 (talk) 06:19, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

As per below's evidence of WP:COI. Also, one open unblock request at a time, please; you had two. Yamla (talk) 11:39, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Every single edit you have made here has been spam related to Fluxim in some way or another, including adding external links to their website, adding citations to their website, and writing about their products. A google search will show that Fluxim employs a "D Hooper" as their "Digital Marketing Manager". Additionally a reddit account [2] who is apparently in charge of updating their website [3] made this post [4], asking if they could pay someone to write an article on fluxim and add links to the fluxim website to wikipedia. Please see the requirements for paid editors (WP:PAID), The guidelines on conflict of interest editing (WP:COI) and the spam policy (WP:SPAM). An admin will not unblock you if you are just going to go back to promoting fluxim. 86.23.109.101 (talk) 08:41, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

so explain to me how this page is allowed to stay since 2011?

Zurich Instruments - Wikipedia DEH100 (talk) 08:58, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]