User talk:DDCool14

May 2023

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. MrOllie (talk) 22:56, 25 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

{{subst:An3-notice}} DDCool14 (talk) 00:24, 26 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

What is wrong with my edits? If you were well-intentioned, you would simply suggest editing instead of undoing all my work. Everything I added is well documented and within my area of expertise, your opposition to have a domestic violence angle to issues of threats, intimidation and the like feels Incel-y. DDCool14 (talk) 00:27, 26 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text at the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. — Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 00:23, 26 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

DDCool14 (talk) 00:33, 26 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry or at least multiple accounts being used simultaneously

@Ingenuity: This user is clearly the same person as Didicool14 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log), continuing with the same "citation spamming" of a particular academic's papers. There's some related discussion over at Talk:Abusive power and control about whether to retain any of their recent additions to that article (some of it cited some other sources for a change). — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼 13:10, 24 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]