User talk:DB Dilan Brechero

Your editing at Latin trap

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Latin trap. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you.

Per the guidelines at WP:GENRECOLOUR, blue banners are to be used only for the infoboxes of genres closely related to blues, rhythm and blues, or contemporary R&B. Hip hop genre infoboxes must instead use dark blue banners. Changes to these guidelines can occur, but they should be proposed first on WP:GENRECOLOUR's talk page. Thank you. Life of Tau 02:15, 9 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Duro y Suave moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Duro y Suave, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please follow the confirms on the Articles for Creation template atop the page. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 01:40, 11 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Fuck you DB Dilan Brechero (talk) 21:05, 13 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Noriel (Rapper)

Hello, DB Dilan Brechero. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Noriel (Rapper), for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. If you don't want Noriel (Rapper) to be deleted, please add a reference to the article.

If you don't understand this message, you can leave a note on my talk page.

Thanks,

Meatsgains^(talk) 21:37, 14 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Latin dancehall moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Latin dancehall, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please follow the confirms on the Articles for Creation template atop the page. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 04:02, 15 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sensualidad (Bad Bunny Song)

What with the repeated edits to this article you create adding "fuuuuck" there? Are you testing something?? ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 00:53, 16 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

June 2018

Hello. Some of your recent genre changes, such as the one you made to Escápate Conmigo (song), have conflicted with our neutral point of view and verifiability policies. While we invite all users to contribute constructively to Wikipedia, we urge all editors to provide reliable sources for edits made. When others disagree, we recommend you seek consensus for certain edits by discussing the matter on the article's talk page. Thank you. Hayman30 (talk) 14:02, 16 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Sensualidad (Bad Bunny Song). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you.Ryanoo (talk) 19:30, 17 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at FIFA World Cup hosts, you may be blocked from editing. Walter Görlitz (talk) 23:18, 18 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Desperte Sin Ti

The article Desperte Sin Ti has been proposed for deletion. The proposed deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 11:37, 19 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Desperte Sin Ti moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Desperte Sin Ti, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please follow the prompts on the Articles for Creation template atop the page. ... discospinster _talk 15:06, 19 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Si Tu Novio Te Deja Sola moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Si Tu Novio Te Deja Sola appeared to be blank apart from the infobox, please complete an article within your sandbox or the draft space before pushing it to the mainspace. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please follow the prompts on the Articles for Creation template atop the page. — IVORK _Discuss 02:01, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Duro y Suave) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Duro y Suave, DB Dilan Brechero!

Wikipedia editor IVORK just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Please add information that proves the individual song's notability per WP:NSONG

To reply, leave a comment on IVORK's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

— IVORK _Discuss 03:53, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Amigos y Enemigos moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Amigos y Enemigos, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please follow the confirms on the Articles for Creation template atop the page. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 02:04, 21 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Amigos y Enemigos

The article Amigos y Enemigos has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No references. Does not contain verifiable information to support musical notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Robert McClenon (talk) 03:01, 23 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

El Problema (Noriel Song) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, El Problema (Noriel Song), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please follow the confirms on the Articles for Creation template atop the page. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 06:02, 23 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Amigos y Enemigos

Please note that you are not allowed to simply cut and paste your own work from draftspace into articlespace. You must submit the draft for review through the WP:AFC process first — if you cut and paste it yourself without an AFC review, it is just going to keep getting redeleted again, because the AFC draft process does not allow you to just cut and paste the page yourself without review. Bearcat (talk) 16:30, 23 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

June 2018

Hello, I'm Z0. I noticed that you recently removed content from 2034 FIFA World Cup without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. The editor whose username is Z0 17:20, 23 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Latin Dancehall for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Latin Dancehall is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Latin Dancehall until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Legacypac (talk) 20:57, 23 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Amorfoda (Bad Bunny Song) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Amorfoda (Bad Bunny Song), does not have enough sources and information as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please follow the confirms on the Articles for Creation template atop the page. Natureium (talk) 18:35, 24 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you blank out or remove content from Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to 2034 FIFA World Cup. The editor whose username is Z0 12:03, 26 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of United Kingdom 2030 FIFA World Cup bid

The article United Kingdom 2030 FIFA World Cup bid has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

recreation of afd deleted article with no change status: NO FORMAL BID from UK yet

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Matthew_hk t c 02:02, 2 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of United Kingdom 2030 FIFA World Cup bid

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on United Kingdom 2030 FIFA World Cup bid, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. –Ammarpad (talk) 02:58, 2 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of 2038 FIFA World Cup for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2038 FIFA World Cup is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2038 FIFA World Cup until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hhkohh (talk) 05:48, 2 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of United Kingdom 2030 FIFA World Cup bid

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on United Kingdom 2030 FIFA World Cup bid requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Matthew_hk t c 00:47, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

July 2018

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Hhkohh (talk) 23:33, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please consider the consensus at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/United Kingdom 2030 FIFA World Cup bid before moving Draft:United Kingdom 2030 FIFA World Cup bid back to the main article area. Frayæ (Talk/Spjall) 18:31, 4 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Alexf^(talk) 19:23, 4 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:United Kingdom 2030 FIFA World Cup bid

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Draft:United Kingdom 2030 FIFA World Cup bid, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Hhkohh (talk) 23:35, 4 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

July 2018

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to 2030 FIFA World Cup, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Tornado chaser (talk) 17:11, 23 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summaries

Adding an edit summary for every edit, even if you think it's a minor change, helps other editors understand the intention of your edits. Thanks! Tera TIX 23:44, 23 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

July 2018

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 months for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 15:14, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You are suspected of sock puppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, then, if you wish to do so, respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/DB Dilan Brechero. Thank you. Matthew_hk t c 20:58, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

November 2018

Hello, I'm Kosack. I noticed that you recently removed content from Kylian Mbappé without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Kosack (talk) 13:05, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@DB Dilan Brechero:, Monaco B played in the same football league system as the first team (not a separate youth league), so please don't remove it from infobox. Matthew hk (talk) 13:14, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, DB Dilan Brechero. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, DB Dilan Brechero. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

November 2018

You are suspected of sock puppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, then, if you wish to do so, respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/DB Dilan Brechero. Thank you. Matthew hk (talk) 14:19, 21 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

This account has been blocked indefinitely from editing for sock puppetry per evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/DB Dilan Brechero. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Bbb23 (talk) 16:11, 21 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Amigos y Enemigos

Hello, DB Dilan Brechero. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Amigos y Enemigos".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Dolotta (talk) 14:40, 30 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Amorfoda (Bad Bunny song)

Hello, DB Dilan Brechero. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Amorfoda".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Dolotta (talk) 14:42, 30 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:El Problema (Noriel Song)

Hello, DB Dilan Brechero. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "El Problema".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:36, 2 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/DB Dilan Brechero, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Erick (talk) 21:18, 20 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]