Jump to content

User talk:D271l

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

[edit]

Hello, D271l, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Johnuniq (talk) 23:14, 6 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Image without == Your submission at Articles for creation: Heavy Cargo Aircraft with Lifting Body (January 24)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Whispering was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Whispering(t) 20:39, 24 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, D271l! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Whispering(t) 20:39, 24 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

[edit]
The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
Thanks for your work on improving articles on obscure aircraft, especially the Boeing Pelican. Your hard work is much appreciated. BilCat (talk) 20:59, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Aerocon Dash 1.6 wingship

[edit]

Hi, do you intend to add anymore information to Draft:Aerocon Dash 1.6 wingship? I believe the subject is notable enough for an aircraft article, but wanted to see if you had any more work left to do on it. Thanks. - BilCat (talk) 21:10, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi BilCat,

Plenty more that needs to be added, but it'll take more research, and I won't be able to get to it for awhile. I think it can go live in its current state, though. I never did find out why it was rejected - my guess is that the "Dash 1.6" part of the vehicle name only appears in the DARPA report and not in any news articles.

Thanks for the barnstar! D271l (talk) 21:26, 23 March 2019 (UTC)

You've welcome. As to why it was rejected, the best thing to do is to ask the reviewer directly. I've created many aircraft articles, and improved many more, but I don't generally review drafts, as reviewing in general isn't part of my skill set. (I hated book reports in school, and rarely write ever write book and product reviews on Amazon, et al.) I've participated in dozens of Articles for Deletion (AfD) discussions. As such, I have a pretty good idea of what makes a good article, and what articles aren't likely to be kept, though this is mostly instinctive on my part. That said, I'd say the article would probably get taken to AfD in its current form, but is a borderline "Keep" or possible "Delete". A little more work would help make this a firm "Keep". I may ask for some more opinions on it at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Aircraft (WT:AIR), the talk page for the Wikipedia:WikiProject Aircraft (WP:AIR), and see if geteting more editors' eyes on the draft. Hopefully we can move it to mainspace soon. - BilCat (talk) 21:43, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
It worked! Thanks for your help, BilCat / ZLEA / Steelpillow! D271l (talk) 18:09, 5 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Aerocon Dash 1.6 wingship has been accepted

[edit]
Aerocon Dash 1.6 wingship, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Cerebellum (talk) 17:27, 5 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 12:29, 1 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:PW-Allison 578-DX (on MD-80).png. However, it is currently missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (User:FastilyBot) 01:01, 6 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Okay User:FastilyBot, I've added the PD-because template so the file now has banner text This file is in the public domain, because publisher freely authorizes reproduction of unsigned material. This information was in the file summary, so I don't know why it would be deleted. D271l (talk) 04:43, 6 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:PW-Allison 578-DX (on MD-80).png

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:PW-Allison 578-DX (on MD-80).png. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

  • make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
  • Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 17 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, D271l. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, Draft:FML (material).

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. — JJMC89(T·C) 02:11, 20 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:PW-Allison 578-DX (on MD-80).png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 26 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Table of Contents of the ICAO Journal, February 1990 edition.png

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Table of Contents of the ICAO Journal, February 1990 edition.png. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 22:31, 2 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, D271l. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Heavy Cargo Aircraft with Lifting Body".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 08:53, 25 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Progress D-236

[edit]
The article you submitted to Articles for creation has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Nimbus (Cumulus nimbus floats by) 20:40, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Yakovlev Yak-46, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Specific fuel consumption (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:26, 6 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: AL-34 has been accepted

[edit]
AL-34, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Robert McClenon (talk) 06:17, 16 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Allison T56, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pressure ratio.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:02, 12 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: EuroFAR has been accepted

[edit]
EuroFAR, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Fiddle Faddle 05:01, 3 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:59, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:US2007025832 CargoContainer Figure21.png listed for discussion

[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:US2007025832 CargoContainer Figure21.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (tc) 00:08, 19 December 2020 (UTC) Magog the Ogre (tc) 00:08, 19 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pratt & Whitney F401

[edit]

Hi D271l, I've been impressed with your work on engine articles, especially your ability to find information on obscure engines such as the Pratt & Whitney XT57 and the various UDF propfan articles. Have you ever come across any information on the Pratt & Whitney F401? We currently have it tucked in on the Pratt & Whitney F100, but I'd love to be able to split it off as its own article, like we did with the J57/XT57. Thanks. BilCat (talk) 23:10, 16 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi BilCat,

I really don't know anything about supersonic engines, but it looks like US government publications provide decent sources of information on Google Books.

  • "New Navy VSTOL". Military Review. Vol. 58, no. 4. April 1978. p. 84. ISSN 0026-4148.
  • "F401 engine development". Are management problems in the acquisition of aircraft gas turbine engines being corrected? (Report). US General Accounting Office. September 30, 1980. pp. 11–12.
  • "Comparison of F-15 and F-14B engines". Fiscal year 1975 authorization for military procurement, research, and development, and active duty, selected reserve and civilian personnel strengths (Report). US General Accounting Office. February 7, 1974. pp. 368–369.
  • "Problems with F-14 engine". Fiscal year 1974 authorization for military procurement, research and development, construction authorization for the safeguard ABM, and active duty and selected reserve strengths (Report). US General Accounting Office. May 15, 1973. pp. 1459–1460.
  • "F-14". Fiscal year 1973 authorization for military procurement, research and development, construction authorization for the safeguard ABM, and active duty and selected reserve strengths (Report). US General Accounting Office. April 18, 1972. pp. 4019–4061.

There's also articles from the Aviation Week archive:

Hope this helps. D271l (talk) 03:56, 17 August 2021 (UTC)

OK thanks, that's a big help! BilCat (talk) 05:23, 17 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:51, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Pratt & Whitney Canada PW100, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bombardier.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Honeywell T55, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pressure ratio.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:General Electric GE1

[edit]

Hi, I ran across a draft, Draft:General Electric GE1, which I am trying to improve, if possible. However, I've not been able to find much on it on the internet. Since you've done some good work on the the GE36 articles, among others, do you think anything can be done with this one to improve it? Thanks. BilCat (talk) 04:51, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi BilCat, there are a couple of formerly classified studies about the GE1 that GE prepared for the Army in 1966 and 1967: Advanced Lift Fan System (LFX) Study and Advanced Lift Fan System (LFX) Study Continuation. I don't know if you would consider those reports to be citable, though. From more conventional sources, the 1970 Aerospace Year Book has a small bit of information, and the Aviation Week magazine archive has several articles from the 1960s (which are unfortunately behind a paywall). D271l (talk) 05:37, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I'll take a look. Thanks again. BilCat (talk) 06:55, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:41, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:50, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The article Ilyushin Il-90 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This article fails GNG. I don't know how this meets GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. 220.240.159.198 (talk) 07:28, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ridership

[edit]

Please stop adding large ridership tables to Amtrak articles. Two decades of contextless statistics are not useful to readers. A few cited sentences summarizing major ridership trends - especially if those trends are commented on by independent sources - would be much more useful. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 06:44, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]