Jump to content

User talk:Czello/Archive 2

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

DrEdna

[edit]

Perhaps we have not met. I am DOCTOR Edna.To whom are you attempting to correspond with on my talk page? You seem to have me confused with somebody else. Please respect free speech and the right of people to correspond my open sourced Wikipedia friend. I will not tolerate harassment from common folk.

I was corresponding with you for your edits to EVula's userpage. I'd like to remind you that Wikipedia does not have free speech, and citing it does not give you free reign to edit someone else's userpage. — Czello BB 09:43, 4 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Free speech? I would settle for the Wikipedia being honest. When I point out that the English Defence League page is a complete travesty, citing 37 different lies, exaggerations, libels, etc, they are ignored. (Cyberia3 (talk) 16:04, 1 August 2013 (UTC))[reply]
It was never ignored. About four other editors all addressed your points and proved that your claims are baseless, and yet you are the one ignoring the discussion. — Czello BB 17:00, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 10 July 2013

[edit]

?

[edit]

Why did you revert sourced information??

Black people in Nazi Germany — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.173.187.57 (talk) 19:53, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

My edit summary explained why. — Czello BB 20:03, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 17 July 2013

[edit]

The Signpost: 24 July 2013

[edit]

The Signpost: 31 July 2013

[edit]

Random act of kindness

[edit]
 Hello Czello BB, Eduemoni has given you a shining smiling star! You see, these things promote WikiLove and hopefully this has made your day better. Spread the Shining Smiling Star whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or someone putting up with some stick at this time. Enjoy! Eduemoni↑talk↓ 18:21, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Solar Deity

[edit]

If a band released a couple of EPs and Single, does it mean the band cannot have a Wiki page? They are studio releases except the fact they are extended plays rather than long plays. And the band had decided that from the very beginning to release only EPs. Aakashdwivedi (talk) 11:14, 5 August 2013 (UTC)Aakashdwivedi.[reply]

Unfortunately they fail WP:NMG. I've started an AfD where you can see in detail my gripes with the article, and you can debate it there. — Czello BB 11:31, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Rubber science

[edit]

I saw your PROD of rubber science and agree with it; this is just an FYI that I have the Spinrad essay, and he makes it clear it's a term he's coining for use in the essay. It's possible that later sources might exist which make it clear that the term has come into critical use, but I'm not aware of any. If this goes to AfD, please drop me a note. Thanks. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 12:22, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your support. Just in case you didn't know, you can add {{Prod2}} underneath my PROD to support it, if you want. — Czello BB 16:48, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 07 August 2013

[edit]

Ravishing Grimness

[edit]

The string of new accounts revert warring at Ravishing Grimness (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) came to my attention. Based on checkuser evidence, I have blocked the lot of them (the same person was operating them all) and protected the article against anonymous editing for a short while. Thanks for watching over the article, and do let me know if there is any further trouble. AGK [•] 14:27, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks very much. Yes, I figured they were all the same person, jumping ship each time an account got a warning, but they abruptly halt before I could file an SPI (and honestly, I felt that if they carried on they'd get outright blocked before it even got to SPI). Just so you know, though, it wasn't just Ravishing Grimness: it was every Darkthrone album after Goatlord, not to mention the Darkthrone article itself. Thanks! — Czello BB 14:49, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 14 August 2013

[edit]

Chelsea Manning pronouns

[edit]

Hi,

You've just corrected a pronoun in Chelsea Manning. I really appreciate the help, but I think this was an error – that was referring to Manning's father. I'm not reverting as I'm wary of being seen as edit-warring (I'm already up to three reverts on United States v. Manning in trying to keep female pronouns there), so I'm pointing it out so you can fix it yourself.

Thank you again for trying to help.

—me_and 15:39, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Oh my, you're absolutely right. I do apologise – I've undone my edit now. Thanks so much for pointing this out to me. — Czello BB 15:44, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
No worries. My first time through correcting most of the pronouns in the article made exactly the same mistake :) —me_and 15:46, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Daniel Bryan

[edit]

Hello Czello, sorry for not providing a source. Bryan has used the knee as his new secondary finisher since Summerslam (as I'm sure you're aware). He pinned Wade Barrett with it on Smackdown as well so it seems to be a solidified finisher. How could I go about giving you proof of this? - Philliesfan136

You simply need to find a reliable source that states that he is using this move as a finisher. The source can't just say that he's used the move, but that it is now a finishing maneuver. — Czello BB 22:55, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I suppose I'll leave it until that is reported as such. Sorry about that. - Philliesfan136
No problem — Czello BB 07:59, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 21 August 2013

[edit]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

[edit]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. —MelbourneStar☆talk 09:46, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Cheers, I saw it. — Czello BB 09:47, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Hope this doesn't land you in any trouble. Whilst I find it is somewhat disappointing that it's had to result in this, hopefully after this situation, important lessons will have been learnt. All the best, —MelbourneStar☆talk 09:58, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 28 August 2013

[edit]

Rage Against the Machine and User:Rambotje

[edit]

Hey, I noticed you reverted some of Rambotje's edits over at the Rage Against the Machine page. I connected with him via Snuggle, referring him to WikiProject Music and the Teahouse. He is a new editor, so if he comes to you for help or to ask why you rv'd his edits, just send him my way. Thanks, theonesean 20:59, 31 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Cheers, no problem. — Czello BB 08:57, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

[edit]
Hello, Czello. You have new messages at Knowledgekid87's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Source

[edit]

PWInsider is realible source: http://www.pwinsider.com/article/80059/2014-wwe-elimination-chamber-will-be-held.html?p=1 .Where doubt must remove the entire table, as is also the source nine PWInsider. 186.251.87.121 (talk) 21:29, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The only sources we're accepting are ones by either WWE.com or the venue itself. These are the only ones we know as fact. — Czello BB 21:30, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

And source nine? 186.251.87.121 (talk) 21:36, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome to remove and replace that one, too. I'm sure there are more official sources lurking about for those ones. — Czello BB 07:32, 6 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Done Bencey (talk) 19:29, 6 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 04 September 2013

[edit]

Thanks

[edit]

Thanks for pointing out my mistake about Barrett. --Brown shoe yuptidoo (talk) 11:26, 10 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

No probs. — Czello BB 11:33, 10 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 11 September 2013

[edit]

death metal

[edit]

groups such as the Nile, Decapitated, Dying Fetus, Brain Drill are NOT followers of Cynic and Atheist. They are a professional brutal death metal bands, but not just a technical death metal, this is not right. We in the Russian Wikipedia is much more correct. And Carcariass this is a MDM group, it is even written in the official site — Preceding unsigned comment added by 178.204.115.163 (talk) 15:53, 19 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

"Brutal" death metal is a fan-made term. It's not a notable term that has received enough coverage to be considered a real genre. Please see this and this for more information. What you do on the Russian Wikipedia has no bearing on this one. — Czello BB 16:01, 19 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 18 September 2013

[edit]

File:Semargl - Tak, Kurwa Uncensored.ogv

[edit]

Thanks for correcting me. My attempt was to check the value of this work as part of evaluating it at Commons:Featured_picture_candidates/File:Semargl_-_Tak,_Kurwa_Uncensored.ogv. It seems you have good experise on the subject. Could you provide any further opinion/suggestion (here or in the nomination page). Thanks, JKadavoor Jee 15:41, 24 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

My only real purpose of removing it was because it was the wrong genre of music for the article (that video is apparently death metal, while the article in question was black metal), and because I wasn't so certain that the band was notable enough for inclusion on the article (unless I'm much mistaken, they don't have an article on the English Wikipedia). I'm afraid I'm not educated enough on the Featured picture candidates debates to have any input over at commons. — Czello BB 15:44, 24 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. It seems to be categorized as Melodic Black Death that made me confused. Anyway, it seems Semargl is not popular outside Ukraine. So I decided to refrain from adding it at Death metal too. JKadavoor Jee 16:02, 24 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I don’t know Semargl either, but you should know that Spirit of Metal can’t be trusted; see de:Portal Diskussion:Metal#Happy Days (Band). --217/83 16:14, 24 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 25 September 2013

[edit]

Talk:Bradley Manning/October 2013 move request

[edit]

Greetings. Because you participated in the August 2013 move request regarding this subject, you may be interested in participating in the current discussion. This notice is provided pursuant to Wikipedia:Canvassing#Appropriate notification. Cheers! bd2412 T 21:33, 4 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 02 October 2013

[edit]

Any chance the Soviet Union can at least have a footnote?

[edit]

In the list of Allied countries in the WW2 article, the USSR is the one on top. No mention of its role before '41. There is a VERY powerful editor who has been so far successful in getting that to be the way we, Wikipedians, tel the History of WW2. I was not the only one who tried to fix things, to go for a compromise, with no success (for crying out loud, even France has a footnote!).

I feel ashamed thatw e cannot do better. I am not savvy enough. Maybe someone who cares for historical truth and knows the ropes should do something. I pretty much stopped participating in WP after that situation. Oh well, just ranting I guess. YamaPlos talk 05:16, 10 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 09 October 2013

[edit]

Sockpuppet

[edit]

helo. I want to inform you that a user named Andrew Stevens Barkley has edited article Islam Awareness Week in the same way as the blocked user user:Indiasummer95 using a mobile. please check him.Lefnic (talk) 07:51, 18 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 16 October 2013

[edit]

Why?

[edit]

Why have you removed my post on the Russian version of the article wwe 2k14? See for yourself, it's more your several times. I never touched, did not want to offend, and I'm not trolling. Just our article more complete and full. See for yourself - here is the link. With respect, your Genrikh VIII (talk) 08:43, 23 October 2013 (UTC). (If you don't understand — ask my English is not so good.)[reply]

It came off as being a bit trollish; however, in hindsight, I see that it could be an issue with the language barrier. I've restored your post now. Apologies for being too hasty. — Czello BB 08:56, 23 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
All okay, no worries.--Genrikh VIII (talk) 09:06, 23 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

3MB

[edit]

The page 3MB mostly like end it in favor of deletion 4 to 3 (even though one is a IP user). It needs to be salted or it will be recreated again. --Miss X-Factor (talk) 02:13, 26 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You'd need to speak to an admin about getting it salted. — Czello BB 18:26, 26 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 23 October 2013

[edit]

The Signpost: 30 October 2013

[edit]

The Signpost: 06 November 2013

[edit]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Czello/Archive_2&oldid=1168300498"