User talk:Cytheriachen

This is Cytheriachen's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (June 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Cytheriachen/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:Cytheriachen/sandbox, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 09:51, 6 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Cytheriachen! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 09:51, 6 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (June 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Wikipedia is not a product guide - fails WP:GNG, requires significant coverage in multiple independent reliable secondary sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Cytheriachen/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:Cytheriachen/sandbox, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 08:25, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kamvas Studio 22

Apologies for delay in responding - need to provide additional supporting sources. Dan arndt (talk) 04:26, 11 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much for your responding. I provide additional supporting sources as following.

https://www.sogi.com.tw/talks/%E7%B9%AA%E7%8E%8B%E4%B8%80%E9%AB%94%E6%A9%9FKamvas_studio_22%E7%99%BC%E4%BD%88_%E7%A7%91%E6%8A%80%E6%84%9F%E5%8D%81%E8%B6%B3_%E9%81%A9%E7%94%A8%E5%A4%9A%E5%A0%B4%E6%99%AF/6265474 http://www.cnarts.net/cweb/news/read.asp?id=453284&kind=%D2%D5%CA%F5 https://penxilstudios.com/huion-kamvas-studio-22/ https://www.huanbao-world.com/others/167665.html http://forum.tabletpcreview.com/threads/huion-kamvas-studio-22-all-in-one-computer.75431/ https://huiontablet.tumblr.com/post/617869125093572608/kamvas-studio-22?is_related_post=1 https://mytabletguide.com/huion-kamvas-studio-22-specs-features-and-overview/ Thank you for your review.

You will need to add those references into the draft article via inline citations - refer Wikipedia's guide to referencing for beginners. Dan arndt (talk) 01:58, 15 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I would also suggest that you remove the table of product specifications, as it makes the article look like an advertisement. Dan arndt (talk) 11:34, 15 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A good example of what I mean is the article on ViewSonic G Tablet. Dan arndt (talk) 03:22, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kamvas Studio 22 has been accepted

Kamvas Studio 22, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Dan arndt (talk) 08:01, 18 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]