User talk:Cyber-Risk 1968

Hello, Cyber-Risk 1968. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Melcous (talk) 04:57, 22 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

October 2023

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that you recently added commentary to an article. While Wikipedia welcomes editors' opinions on an article and how it could be changed, these comments are more appropriate for the article's accompanying talk page. If you post your comments there, other editors working on the same article will notice and respond to them, and your comments will not disrupt the flow of the article. However, keep in mind that even on the talk page of an article, you should limit your discussion to improving the article. Article talk pages are not the place to discuss opinions of the subject of articles, nor are such pages a forum. Thank you. MrOllie (talk) 01:25, 21 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Non constructive comment at Talk:Biden–Ukraine conspiracy theory

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Talk:Biden–Ukraine conspiracy theory. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you.

I see your comment was removed, as it should have been. It contained no RS or suggested changes of wording that would improve the article. It was just your screed of attacks and opinions gleaned from unreliable sources. (Yes, we read them too and recognize them.) Events have overtaken you and you didn't notice. Lev Parnas, one of the prime movers behind the failed attempts by the Trump/Giuliani nexus of Russian patsies to frame Joe Biden has testified about what they did to create and pass on false stories received directly from Russian intelligence. They knew they were lies, but did it anyway. See Biden–Ukraine conspiracy theory#Lev Parnas testimony.

Now the REPUBLICAN!! Chair of the House Intelligence Committee, Republican Representative Mike Turner, has complained about how Russian propaganda is 'being uttered on the House floor'. Two key GOP chairmen are merely the latest to warn about how Russian influence has infected their party:

"In an interview with Puck News’s Julia Ioffe, Rep. Michael McCaul (R-Tex.) — none other than the GOP chairman of the House Foreign Affairs Committee — flat-out said that Russian propaganda has “infected a good chunk of my party’s base.”

You too are repeating that Russian propaganda and lies, and we will not push it here. It comes from bad sources.

If you want to make changes to an article, you must provide RS. Comments like yours that run contrary to RS will just be removed as unconstructive. You must read the article, check its sources, and then make your comment with that as your starting point. Then provide RS and wordings that you feel will make the article more accurate. Avoid WP:NOTFORUM. Focus on content and do not attack other editors or assume bad faith. We are all volunteers here and do the best we can. - Valjean (talk) (PING me) 23:31, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]