User talk:Cyanochic

/AfC notification archive

Welcome!

Hello, Cyanochic!

Welcome to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Getting Started

Tutorial
Learn everything you need to know to get started.

Introduction to contributing

The Teahouse
Ask questions and get help from experienced editors.

The Task Center
Learn what Wikipedians do and discover how to help.

Tips

Don't be afraid to edit! Just find something that can be improved and make it better. Other editors will help fix any mistakes you make.
It's normal to feel a little overwhelmed, but don't worry if you don't understand everything at first—it's fine to edit using common sense.
If an edit you make is reverted, you can discuss the issue at the article's talk page. Be civil, and don't restore the edit unless there is consensus.
Always use edit summaries to explain your changes.
When adding new content to an article, always include a citation to a reliable source.
If you wish to edit about a subject with which you are affiliated, read our conflict of interest guide and disclose your connection.
Have fun! Your presence in the Wikipedia community is welcome.

Happy editing! Cheers, 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 07:06, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia beginners wanted for user testing

Wikimedia Deutschland is looking for beginner editors for user testing! We are working on some changes that may affect the editing experience, and we want to make sure that our changes don't make things more difficult for beginners. If you made less than 100 edits, we would love to hear from you! More information and a signup: https://greatquestion.co/wikimediadeutschland/4oADuQpx/apply. --Johannes Richter (WMDE) (talk) 10:18, 19 September 2024 (UTC) PS: This is a one-time message to selected beginner editors. You won't get any further notifications if you're not interested.[reply]

Women in Red

Hi there, Cyanochic, and welcome to Women in Red. It's good to see you intend to help us along by improving our coverage of women in the life sciences. You have made a good start by already creating two biographies and we look forward to many more. You might find it useful to look through the guidance in our Primer. I've taken the liberty of adding the WiR user box to your user page. Please let me know if you run into any difficulties or need assistance. Happy editing!--Ipigott (talk) 07:25, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red October 2024

Women in Red | October 2024, Volume 10, Issue 10, Numbers 293, 294, 318, 319, 320

Online events:

New: Women in STEM | Geofocus: Islands I-P | Women in archaeology

Continuing: #1day1woman | Education (year-long initiative)

Announcements from other communities

October is Women in Green's "Around the World in 31 Days" Good Article Edit-a-thon

Tip of the month:

Unsure how to expand a stub article? Take a look at this guidance

Other ways to participate:

Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications.
Join the conversations on our talkpage.
Help us plan future events and add any general ideas on developing the project.
Follow us on social media:

Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter/X

--Ipigott (talk) 07:25, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Monica A. Driscoll

I've just marked the page Monica A. Driscoll as reviewed. Thank you for taking the time to write it! I've marked it as a "Start" class for now, but you said you'd like to expand it? That sounds like a great idea. Too few women academics have articles here, and it's lovely seeing somebody closing the gap.

And, personally, I love the idea that we live in an age where somebody can put 3,600 worms in a rocket and do actual, scientific research on it. [1] Could you imagine telling that to our ancestors, hundreds of years ago? GreenLipstickLesbian (talk) 23:53, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for reviewing and cleaning it up some! I ran out of time and had to shut down my computer to rush to a meeting but I figured it was in a good enough state to hit go. (Hence publishing in a slightly unfinished state.) Cyanochic (talk) 00:03, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

NAS Scientists

After responding to your post at the Teahouse, I took a look at your list of "to-dos" from the NAS scientists. You may find it helpful that some are already listed at Wikidata and if they had articles in any foreign-language sources, the Wikidata item would show that and may show other links, e.g. to ORCHID. You can even Wikilink to such items, using the {{ill}} template. Hence Barry Ganetzky [Wikidata], for example. (See source code for details.) I'm a Brit, so if you are looking to expand your redlist, you can always look for anyone who is/was an FRS. Best of luck! Mike Turnbull (talk) 15:59, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ah thank you for this tip! I've been trying pretty hard to make sure no red links are for a page that actually exists, but I hadn't thoguht about searching Wikidata or other language Wikipedias for other information yet. I only just started to understand Wikidata through the authority control template recently. Maybe I'll turn to FRS after finishing NAS lists :) Cyanochic (talk) 18:36, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Teahouse followup

If there is anything that I can do to assist you with navigating Wikipedia processes, please let me know. You are doing good work, and I thank you for it. Cullen328 (talk) 09:11, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you!! Cyanochic (talk) 14:25, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Echoing Cullen328's encouragement. Thanks for joining us. BusterD (talk) 04:01, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

GA effort

In my long-term project to bring all vitamin articles to GA, I often found it necessary to make major cuts to text and references before adding better content, and to rename and reorder sections. I wish you good luck for your endeavors. P.S. I had a few GA efforts fail and then succeeded with second applications. David notMD (talk) 09:17, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Good luck on your vitamin GA endeavors!! Cyanochic (talk) 14:20, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Planning on submitting Vitamin E soon, then the daunting Vitamin D for last vitamin. I have also improve the nutrient minerals, but have no intentions toward raising those to GA. David notMD (talk) 02:38, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Alice Elizabeth Louisa Melliss

Hi, I had a look at your Draft:Alice Elizabeth Louisa Melliss following a discussion about Articles for creation at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Women in Red. I am not seeing Wikipedia:Notability so far as I can't find "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject" and have asked at Women in Red to see if anyone can find any better sources. I see that Ipigott has already welcomed you to the project. I have added a source for her wedding. Generally it is best to check the subject is notable before starting an article, because if sources don't exist, you won't be able to find them later. TSventon (talk) 15:37, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for letting me know! When I started the article, I was on the fence about whether or not she would be notable enough. My one thought was that Saint Helena isn't a large location and her plates from the book were all on Wikimedia already and stamps with her art were released by Saint Helena Post Office. I submitted to AfC instead of just publishing because I wasn't sure if she would be notable enough, so won't be too bummed if consensus is no. Cyanochic (talk) 16:22, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

In general it seems like the Melliss family had a large contribution on Saint Helena, so if the result is not notable enough. Maybe text I worked on there gets incorporated into another article. (Like her husband's page, which is where Alice Elizabeth Louisa Melliss redirects to now.) Cyanochic (talk) 16:24, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that if it isn't accepted, the coverage of Alice M in John Charles Melliss's article should be improved. Anyway, more sources may turn up, or she may be notable under another criterion. Your article reminded me of another woman illustrator, Adèle de Dombasle, who was researched by a project called Pacific Matildas. TSventon (talk) 16:57, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I have been looking at the images in St. Helena and they seem to have various authors. Could you check the draft? Alice is credited with botanical plates on the title page and the only stamp in Commons:Category:Alice Elizabeth Louisa Melliss is the Mellissia Begonifolia one. The beetle seems to be by J. C. Mellis, see the original on Commons, Commons:File:MELLISS(1875) p205 - PLATE 23.jpg. TSventon (talk) 15:53, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oh good catch! I updated the image on the draft at least to the image you referenced. I might have time later today to look into more references, but I'm not sure how much I'll be able to get to with archive.org still down. Cyanochic (talk) 18:22, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I found St.Helena here on Google books. The original pictures for the stamps are all in Commons:Category:St. Helena - a physical, historical, and topographical description of the island (1875) by MELLISS. Hopefully archive.org will be back eventually. TSventon (talk) 22:41, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Now published through AfC. More sources would still be good if they turn up. TSventon (talk) 19:17, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the heads up! I'm using a work break to compile notes on the species drawn by A. Melliss in the 1875 book that I'll share on the talk page shortly to hopefully improve the article. After that I may wait to see what happens with archive.org before trying to dig any deeper. Cyanochic (talk) 19:23, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hello Cyanochic! The thread you created at the Teahouse, tagging original research vs deleting content?, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.

See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=KiranBOT}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). —KiranBOT (talk) 03:34, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red November 2024

Women in Red | November 2024, Vol 10, Issue 11, Nos 293, 294, 321, 322, 323

Online events:

New: Asian women | Geofocus: Islands Q-Z | Women in engineering

Continuing: #1day1woman | Education (year-long initiative)

Announcements from other communities

Annual Wikipedia Asian Month (WAM) is an online campaign designed to boost
Asian content on Wikipedia each November.
Unreferenced articles backlog drive. These Wikiproject clean-up lists offer a start
to November's backlog drive, e.g. Women's History and Women writers

Tip of the month:

Looking for an image? Sometimes you can find openly licensed images at
search.creativecommons.org/

Other ways to participate:

Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications.
Join the conversations on our talkpage.
Help us plan future events and add any general ideas on developing the project.
Follow us on social media:

Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter/X

--Lajmmoore (talk 20:45, 29 October 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hello Cyanochic! The thread you created at the Teahouse, Moving a page back to previous naming? (minor naming change -capitalization), has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.

See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=KiranBOT}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). —KiranBOT (talk) 03:41, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to the drive!

Welcome, welcome, welcome Cyanochic! I'm glad that you are joining the November 2024 drive! Please, have a cup of WikiTea, and go cite some articles.

Fix a random page lacking sources

Cielquiparle (talk) 12:05, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:55, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]