User talk:Cvjayanthy

Cvjayanthy, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Cvjayanthy! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Lightbreather (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:11, 5 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Amrutha Anand

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Amrutha Anand, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.
It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. DGG ( talk ) 00:24, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Amrutha Anand for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Amrutha Anand is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amrutha Anand until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 07:15, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I've put in a bit more of a detailed explanation as to why the page is up for deletion. Unlike speedy deletion, the articles for deletion process gives you more time to look for sources. The issue here is that while Miss Anand does appear to have accomplished a record, we need coverage in independent, secondary sources that would show that this is notable enough for Wikipedia. Listing record places is good, but not all record websites are really considered to be sources that can give notability. The best places to list as sources would be things like newspaper articles, links to TV news spots that are on the official news outlet website or channels (anything rehosted by someone else would be considered a potential copyright violation that we cannot link to), and similar. Now coverage does not have to be in English, so if there is coverage in another language then you can certainly link to those websites. I'm asking WP:INDIA to come in and help look for sources since again, there may be coverage in another language and they can help look for sources that would otherwise not be found by editors who are not able to speak/read any of the other languages used in India. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 07:15, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]