User talk:Cuty Pie Sweetu

Cuty Pie Sweetu, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Cuty Pie Sweetu! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Samwalton9 (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

22:03, 24 June 2017 (UTC)

How dare you to delete my contributed edition without informing me??? If you want only handle u, then create your own website.

June 2017

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to List of Bengali TV channels has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: List of Bengali TV channels was changed by Cuty Pie Sweetu (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.860445 on 2017-06-26T20:28:53+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 20:28, 26 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

July 2017

Hello, I'm The Banner. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Zee Entertainment Enterprises have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles are written objectively and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. The Banner talk 20:09, 22 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Star India, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Adam9007 (talk) 00:27, 23 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Zee Entertainment Enterprises, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. Grayfell (talk) 01:05, 23 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Notability

Hello. Your recent edit to List of Bengali TV channels appears to have added the name of a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person or organization added to a list should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. Thank you. --Worldbruce (talk) 18:34, 17 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Zee Hindustan

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Zee Hindustan requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://www.exchange4media.mobi/tv/zee-group-news-channel-zee-hindustan-goes-live_68903.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. reddogsix (talk) 19:34, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Star Gold Select

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Star Gold Select, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. The Banner talk 20:57, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Zee Hindustan

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Zee Hindustan, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. -- Dane ^talk 19:29, 30 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

November 2017

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Zee Entertainment Enterprises. Clubjustin ^Talkosphere 13:54, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Zee Entertainment Enterprises, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Clubjustin ^Talkosphere 14:10, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop attacking other editors, as you did on User talk:Clubjustin. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. -- There'sNoTime ^{(to explain)} 14:22, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistent vandalism, as you did at Zee Entertainment Enterprises. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. -- There'sNoTime ^{(to explain)} 14:34, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Cuty Pie Sweetu. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Cuty Pie Sweetu. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. Editing for the purpose of advertising or promotion is not permitted. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your COI when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Also please note that editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. The Banner talk 11:15, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Conflict of Interest

As far as I can see, you have a clear Conflict of Interest about Zee Entertainment Enterprises and its related TV channels. Declaring a conflict of interest (or even paid editing) is mandatory. Up to now, I have not seen any declaration of that kind. Please do so on your user page. Thank you. The Banner talk 13:10, 7 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

January 2018

Hello, I'm VibeScepter. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Zee Entertainment Enterprises have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. VibeScepter (talk) 18:20, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Reported at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard

I have reported you to the "Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard" for an investigation about a Conflict of Interest or even undeclared Paid Editing. You can find the case at Wikipedia:Conflict_of_interest/Noticeboard#Cuty_Pie_Sweetu. Please respond there. The Banner talk 21:20, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

January 2018

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at List of Bengali-language television channels, you may be blocked from editing. Alexf^(talk) 11:39, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning if you make any further edits without responding to the inquiry you received regarding undisclosed paid editing. Winged Blades^Godric 15:09, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Coming soon and Upcoming claims

Hi Cuty Pie Sweetu additions like this and this could be Reverted, Removed or challenge if there will be no reliable sources. Thanks Sid95Q (talk) 19:58, 19 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Valid source

http://www.indiantelevision.com/television/tv-channels/gecs/new-gec-star-prime-in-the-works-for-star-india-180315 Cuty Pie Sweetu (talk) 11:02, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Again your are not adding references with content please check Wikipedia:Tutorial/Citing sources to know how to add sources. Sid95Q (talk) 16:17, 28 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Dus Ka Dum Season 3 Valid Source

https://twitter.com/SonyTV/status/975280651472535552?s=19 Cuty Pie Sweetu (talk) 11:04, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

citing sources

Please learn how to cite source Wikipedia:Tutorial/Citing sources. Thanks. Sid95Q (talk) 09:13, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please learn how to cite sources as this is not the proper way to cite sources. Check the above mentioned tutorial. Regards. Sid95Q (talk) 19:19, 22 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

And please check WP:ICTFFAQ to know which sources are considered reliable for a TV series related article. Sid95Q (talk) 19:22, 22 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Again here you added a reference in a disruptive manner please check Wikipedia:Tutorial/Citing sources to know how to add references (this is my third message regarding his) and Bizasialive is not considered a reliable source check WP:ICTFFAQ to know which sources are actually considered authentic. Sid95Q (talk) 09:43, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This link will help you Help:Referencing for beginners. Sid95Q (talk) 20:19, 30 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Again reported at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard

The way you are editing proves, to my opinion, that you have a Conflict of Interest regarding Zee Media Corporation Limited, Sony Pictures Networks India, Zee Entertainment Enterprises and related companies. Therefore I have filed a second case against you at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard as follow up of the case in January 2018.

Please respond on the case! The Banner talk 12:49, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

August 2018

You provided facebook link as a reference in 'List of programs broadcast by Star Jalsha' page. I think social media such as Facebook, Twitter, Tublr etc are not trusted source.--- Hamim000000 (talk) 03:22, 2 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you use Wikipedia for soapboxing, promotion or advertising, as you did at News18 Gujarati. scope_creep (talk) 22:04, 6 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Star Suvarna TV moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Star Suvarna TV, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. JSFarman (talk) 20:09, 8 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Star Suvarna TV (August 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

It is unclear as to what the article is actually about. Lacks inline citations required to establish notability.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Star Suvarna TV and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Star Suvarna TV, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 02:45, 9 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Star Suvarna TV (August 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Drewmutt was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

No improved references since last decline.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Star Suvarna TV and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Star Suvarna TV, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Drewmutt (^ᴥ^) talk 18:25, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Logos of Indian TV channels

I reverted some of your edits before, due to the fact that you were uploading certain images incorrectly. Here's the way you need to link them in the TV channel infobox. Thanks in advance, cheers. --Bankster (talk) 01:37, 15 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Unfree file

Hello. An unfree file in both Wikipedia and Commons is the one that is copyrighted by a third-party and, thus, cannot be used on the site as it is incompatible with out policy of uploading free files only. Users that deleted your files might have noticed you downloaded your logos from Google and then directly uploaded them to Commons. --Bankster (talk) 07:16, 18 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Without Google, how can I find the logos? I just take a screenshot of that logo & then reduce it using reduceimages website & then upload it on Commons. U tale me what is wrong in this procedure? Cuty Pie Sweetu (talk) 08:51, 18 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

That it does not give you the copyright on that picture. Nor does it make it "own work". The Banner talk 10:43, 18 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It's mean, except some selected people, no one has the permission to update here right? Its for some selected people, i understand Cuty Pie Sweetu (talk) 12:07, 18 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Do you understand how copyright works? The Banner talk 12:10, 18 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

No. U can teach me. Cuty Pie Sweetu (talk) 13:05, 18 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Lesson 1: A "creative product" is every product written, painted, photographed, designed or otherwise originally created.

Lesson 2: when you did not create a "creative product", you do not have the copyright.

Lesson 3: when it is not explicitly stated that a "creative product" is free of copyright, assume that it is protected by copyright.

Lesson 4: Reworking (in any form) or owning the "creative product" does not give you the copyright.

I hope this helps... The Banner talk 14:51, 18 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

When I take a screenshot of any pic, then this pic only belongs to me. So, no one can demand about the copyright of this screenshot. Then how can it be problem? Cuty Pie Sweetu (talk) 16:57, 18 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, the picture belongs to you. But when you make a picture of a copyright protected work, the copyright is not yours. The copyright is still with the creator of the copyright protected work. The Banner talk 17:44, 18 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Then tell me which pics are able to post on wikipedia? Cuty Pie Sweetu (talk) 00:35, 19 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Why are you uploading files when you have not clue at all what you are doing?

What you can upload are files of which the copyright has expired (100 years if the maker is unknown, 70 years after the death of the creator when he or she is known). And you can upload your own photos as long as the subject is copyright-free. The Banner talk 01:32, 19 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. I don't know the actual procedure of uploading pix on Wikipedia. So, u can just complete my desired works, what I m trying to do again n again. U simply add the logos of Indian tv channels, like all Zee, Star, Viacom, Sony etc channels. I m only interested on this tv section. I guess, without logo, tv channel page is not looking good. Add logos please. My one & only wish. Cuty Pie Sweetu (talk) 06:35, 19 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I can not upload those logo as they are unfree. Are you working for the TV Channels? The Banner talk 11:02, 19 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Are you so desperate to upload the logos that you created another account on Commons? Sad, as both your account and that of your so called sockpuppet are now blocked. Instead of uploads, you got punishment. Please, stop with this. The Banner talk 20:57, 30 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

September 2018

Hello, I'm Sid95Q. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to List of programs broadcast by SAB TV have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Here we don't add upcoming shows/programming without a reliable source Sid95Q (talk) 03:08, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

This account has been blocked indefinitely from editing for sock puppetry per evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Prab Toor. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Bbb23 (talk) 16:50, 24 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Star Suvarna TV

Hello, Cuty Pie Sweetu. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Star Suvarna TV".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Dolotta (talk) 22:07, 18 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Star Suvarna for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Star Suvarna is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Star Suvarna until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 01:24, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Cuty Pie Sweetu, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

General Ization ^Talk 20:34, 12 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Cuty Pie Sweetu, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Hug^syrup 11:27, 29 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Cuty Pie Sweetu, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

—Nnadigoodluck🇳🇬 08:33, 28 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Cuty Pie Sweetu, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 22:40, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]