Jump to content

User talk:Curtmarsalis

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Hello, Curtmarsalis, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started. Happy editing! KylieTastic (talk) 19:40, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank You, Kylie Tastic. Curtmarsalis (talk) 00:17, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

[edit]
Teahouse logo

Hi Curtmarsalis! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Ukraine, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.


See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

April 2022

[edit]
Information icon

Hello Curtmarsalis. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Draft:Kandiid, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Curtmarsalis. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Curtmarsalis|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Kuru (talk) 16:44, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I, Curtmarsalis am not a paid contributor, nor do I expect to receive compensation for any edits. I understand the Conflict of Interest (COI) policy. Curtmarsalis (talk) 21:09, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Do you have a connection to the app? 331dot (talk) 16:46, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
No, I have no connection to the app. I filled out Wiki Terms of use affidavit April 16, 2022, stating that. I am not a paid contributor, nor am I affiliated. Curtmarsalis (talk) 05:48, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kandiid (April 30)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Robertsky were:
This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
– robertsky (talk) 05:42, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Curtmarsalis! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! – robertsky (talk) 05:42, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Julian Keyz moved to draftspace

[edit]

An article you recently created, Julian Keyz, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. PRAXIDICAE🌈 13:34, 8 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Julian Keyz

[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Julian Keyz, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. PRAXIDICAE🌈 13:41, 8 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Contested deletion

[edit]

This page is not unambiguously promotional, because... (I do understand and agree with the editors tag. Instead of deletion, I make an argument to move the article to draft space for improvements. I am prepared to rewrite article and remove the citation needed sentences from article for the subject has no credible citations to prove its authencity) --Curtmarsalis (talk) 15:02, 8 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Curtmarsalis You say the subject has "no credible citations to prove its authencity". If there are no reliable sources that are independant of Mr. Keyz or his publicity team that have published significant coverage of Mr. Keyz, then he does not meet the requirements to have an article about him in this encyclopedia. ~ ONUnicorn(Talk|Contribs)problem solving 18:51, 8 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I have copied both your comment and my response from Draft talk:Julian Keyz, as it is really important you read and understand the policies I cited in my response so that you will not continue to create doomed articles. ~ ONUnicorn(Talk|Contribs)problem solving 18:52, 8 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Sho-Time Battle Rap League

[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Sho-Time Battle Rap League, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. PRAXIDICAE🌈 13:42, 8 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Karine Sho-Time Thornton (September 15)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by S0091 was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Many of the sources used are not reliable and interviews cannot be used to establish notability. Nothing indicates they are notable.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
S0091 (talk) 16:15, 15 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kandiid (January 17)

[edit]
Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by S0091 was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia.
S0091 (talk) 16:31, 17 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Karine Sho-Time Thornton

[edit]

Information icon Hello, Curtmarsalis. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Karine Sho-Time Thornton, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 02:01, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Kandiid

[edit]

Information icon Hello, Curtmarsalis. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Kandiid, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:02, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Kandiid

[edit]

Hello, Curtmarsalis. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Kandiid".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Hey man im josh (talk) 18:31, 12 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Curtmarsalis&oldid=1179829877"