User talk:Curious1949

Welcome

Hello, Curious1949, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your edits have not conformed to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and have been reverted. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Dougweller (talk) 06:30, 21 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ELNO

Please read WP:ELNO Cheers Doc James (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 23:26, 26 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Spam

Looking at your edit history, it appears that your edits to Wikipedia consist almost entirely of adding links to ias.umn.edu. Please review Wikipedia policies on WP:EL and spamming, especially the section WP:PROMO. If you see an article in the future that you feel absolutely requires a link to a talk at ias.umn.edu, please consider posting on the article's talk page to suggest the link; a neutral editor can then determine whether it needs to be in the article. Please let me know if you have any questions. -- Khazar2 (talk) 23:57, 2 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Mali

I have reverted your addition there because it does not fit into an encyclopedic summary of a major country. Materialscientist (talk) 23:54, 17 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Single purpose spam account -- January 2012

I'm disappointed to see that you've continued to edit Wikipedia exclusively for the promotion of the website ias.umn.edu. Since you've refused to engage in discussion with several editors who tried to reach you through this page, I've removed your advertisements and reported you at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Spam. If you feel information from your organization is absolutely critical to understanding the topics involved, I suggest in the future that you propose your links on the article talk page, while noting that you are a single-purpose account for adding links to ias.umn.edu to Wikipedia. Uninvolved editors can then determine whether linking to your organization is useful or spam. Thanks, -- Khazar2 (talk) 00:44, 18 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I did not mean to be disrespectful. It is true that my posts do link back to the Institute for Advanced Study--we have several events a week, which we record, and we also have a relationship with a cable tv show called Bat of Minerva. Many of our recordings are in fact relevant to Wikipedia entries. I understand that you do not want Wikipedia to simply become a list of links, so I have in general added information to the text and used links as sources for the information I have added. I had hoped that that would take care of the link list problem. In the future, I will put links on the talk page and let editors decide whether or not they will add to the post. Sorry for the inconvenience.

That would be very appreciated. Since I've been looking into this, one or two editors have pointed out to me that a few of these links are indeed useful additions, so I apologize if I came on a bit strong. On the other hand, as you've seen, many of them have been immediately removed by editors beside myself; links like these can be a bit trivial for subjects of large scope like Mali, or in the articles of academics who have delivered dozens of lectures. Sounds like the talk page is a good way to go to sort out which is which. Thanks for your efforts and being willing to engage. Cheers, -- Khazar2 (talk) 07:36, 20 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

OK--that's how I'll proceed. Thanks.

---Notice of new addition--- I added a link and some language to the article on Susan Whitfield. She does a very good job of talking about her life and her work at http://ias.umn.edu/2013/01/13/whitfield/

I added a link to the article on Salif Keita to an interview with Cherif Keita, who wrote a biography of him. Cherif Keita is an important scholar of Malian music, and the interview is quite excellent.

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:06, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jin Yi (March 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Onel5969 was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jin Yi and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:53, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Curious1949, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:53, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Zhou Qi (March 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Liance was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment they left was:

Improperly formatted inline citations, not enough citations, off-wiki links are generally disallowed in the article content (an external link section may be more appropriate).

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Zhou Qi and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

-Liance^{talk/contribs} 15:31, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Zhou Qi (March 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Onel5969 was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Zhou Qi and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:14, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jin Yi (poet) has been accepted

Jin Yi (poet), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

JSFarman (talk) 16:18, 7 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Zhou Qi (March 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment they left was:

Still needs any further available in-depth sources about her to satisfy WP:CREATIVE.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Zhou Qi and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister talk 05:15, 13 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Zhou Qi (June 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Daniel kenneth was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Zhou Qi and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Daniel kenneth (talk) 17:39, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Curious1949. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Sequels to Dream of the Red Chamber

Hello, Curious1949. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Sequels to Dream of the Red Chamber".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 17:32, 28 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Song Mingqiong

Hello, Curious1949. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Song Mingqiong".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. 1989 (talk) 14:21, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Zhou Qi

Hello, Curious1949. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Zhou Qi".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. TopCipher (talk) 09:22, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Curious1949. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]