User talk:Culturemanagement

Welcome!

Hello, Culturemanagement, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as User:Culturemanagement, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.

Article development
Standard layout
Lead section
The perfect article
Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, ask me on my talk page. You can also type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Drm310 🍁 (talk) 16:12, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Culturemanagement

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. A tag has been placed on User:Culturemanagement requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Drm310 🍁 (talk) 16:12, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

September 2023

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Your user page may not meet Wikipedia's user page guidelines. It is intended for basic information about yourself, your interests and goals as they relate to editing Wikipedia, as well as disclosures of conflicts of interest and paid editing. Although a lot of freedom is allowed in personalizing your user page, it is not:

an encyclopedia article (and should not be styled to look like one)
a workspace for a draft article
a personal website, blog, or social media site
a space for self-promotion or other advertising
a CV, resumé or lengthy autobiography

The user page guidelines have additional information on what is and what is not considered acceptable content. Please use your user sandbox or the draft article space to practice editing or to create new articles. Thank you. Drm310 🍁 (talk) 16:12, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Contested deletion

This page should not be speedily deleted because...This is my first entry and since when are artist descriptions illegal on WP?? If some wording or reference should change let m e know^ --Culturemanagement (talk) 16:14, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"Klaus Damm's artistic journey remains a dynamic and evolving narrative"--that's not a "description". The entire thing should be rewritten from scratch, it should follow our conventional formatting guidelines, it should have neutral language ("Klaus Damm's artistic journey has been marked by continuous evolution, innovation, and a commitment to pushing artistic boundaries"--seriously?), and it should have reliable secondary sources instead of spam links. Drmies (talk) 16:16, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
.Strongly disagreed! Thank you for the feedback tho, if one more person agrees I will change the wording in question. If you want to rewrite it entirely I'm happy to provide my notes to you, if you just intended to be needlessly rude - fair enough.

If you show me how to upload his certificates I'm happy to provide those secondary sources and upload even more pictures next week. Otherwise I have to do it as intended step by step to improve it, in case someone on a bitter rant doesnt delete it beforehand.

Best regards Culturemanagement (talk) 16:28, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

To be considered notable enough for inclusion, this person must meet Wikipedia's notability criteria for creative professionals. Citations to reliable and independent sources are required to demonstrate notability. Also, articles must be written from a neutral point of view without any subjective wording that promotes the subject.

I do not know if you have a personal or professional affiliation to this person. If you do, then you should disclose it, as this would be considered a conflict of interest. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 17:00, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No, we're not going to upload "certification" or whatever; those are not secondary sources. If you cannot see how the citations I provided are promotional rather than neutral and encyclopedic, I'm afraid that this isn't going anywhere. I'm not sure what "bitter rant" you're pointing at, but I encourage you to not make these matters personal. I assure you that I was not "intend[ing] to be needlessly rude". Drmies (talk) 17:25, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Klaus Damm

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Klaus Damm, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Drmies (talk) 16:17, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough, I will rework it accordingly asap! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Culturemanagement (talk • contribs)

Please also remember to sign your posts on discussion pages, so that readers can tell who wrote what, and when. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 03:22, 19 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]