User talk:Cuchullain/Archive 39
This is an archive of past discussions about User:Cuchullain. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 35 | ← | Archive 37 | Archive 38 | Archive 39 |
Administrators' newsletter – January 2020
News and updates for administrators from the past month (December 2019).
|
|
- A request for comment asks whether partial blocks should be enabled on the English Wikipedia. If enabled, this functionality would allow administrators to block users from editing specific pages or namespaces, rather than the entire site.
- A proposal asks whether admins who don't use their tools for a significant period of time (e.g. five years) should have the toolset procedurally removed.
- Following a successful RfC, a whitelist is now available for users whose redirects will be autopatrolled by a bot, removing them from the new pages patrol queue. Admins can add such users to Wikipedia:New pages patrol/Redirect whitelist after a discussion following the guidelines at Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Redirect whitelist.
- The fourth case on Palestine-Israel articles was closed. The case consolidated all previous remedies under one heading, which should make them easier to understand, apply, and enforce. In particular, the distinction between "primary articles" and "related content" has been clarified, with the former being
the entire set of articles whose topic relates to the Arab-Israeli conflict, broadly interpreted
rather thanreasonably construed
. - Following the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections, the following editors have been appointed to the Arbitration Committee: Beeblebrox, Bradv, Casliber, David Fuchs, DGG, KrakatoaKatie, Maxim, Newyorkbrad, SoWhy, Worm That Turned, Xeno.
- The fourth case on Palestine-Israel articles was closed. The case consolidated all previous remedies under one heading, which should make them easier to understand, apply, and enforce. In particular, the distinction between "primary articles" and "related content" has been clarified, with the former being
- This issue marks three full years of the Admin newsletter. Thanks for reading!
Administrators' newsletter – February 2020
News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2020).
|
Interface administrator changes
|
- Following a request for comment, partial blocks are now enabled on the English Wikipedia. This functionality allows administrators to block users from editing specific pages or namespaces rather than the entire site. A draft policy is being workshopped at Wikipedia:Partial blocks.
- The request for comment seeking the community's sentiment for a binding desysop procedure closed with
wide-spread support for an alternative desysoping procedure based on community input
. No proposed process received consensus.
- Twinkle now supports partial blocking. There is a small checkbox that toggles the "partial" status for both blocks and templating. There is currently one template: {{uw-pblock}}.
- When trying to move a page, if the target title already exists then a warning message is shown. The warning message will now include a link to the target title. [1]
- Following a recent arbitration case, the Arbitration Committee reminded administrators
that checkuser and oversight blocks must not be reversed or modified without prior consultation with the checkuser or oversighter who placed the block, the respective functionary team, or the Arbitration Committee.
- Following a recent arbitration case, the Arbitration Committee reminded administrators
- Voting in the 2020 Steward elections will begin on 08 February 2020, 14:00 (UTC) and end on 28 February 2020, 13:59 (UTC). The confirmation process of current stewards is being held in parallel. You can automatically check your eligibility to vote.
- The English Wikipedia has reached six million articles. Thank you everyone for your contributions!
Happy Adminship Anniversary!
- Thank you very much!—Cúchullain t/c 04:54, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
Happy First Edit Day!
- Congrats on 15 years!!! Bobherry Talk Edits 01:06, 20 February 2020 (UTC)
- Thank you thank you!—Cúchullain t/c 01:26, 20 February 2020 (UTC)
Happy First Edit Day!
- Thank you Captain Raju!—Cúchullain t/c 11:00, 21 February 2020 (UTC)
Elwin/Elwen
Hi Cuchullain, I wanted to get your current opinion about the Elwin redirect page. I think you might want to consider changing the Elwin page that you created as a redirect page on 20 January 2010 to a Disambiguation page because there are many other uses of the name Elwin and your redirect target is not even spelled the same. For Example: Elwin, Illinois, Verrier Elwin, Whitwell Elwin, Ross Elwin, Hastings Elwin, among others as well as several given names Elwin.BuffaloBob (talk) 20:22, 21 February 2020 (UTC)
- Good idea. I'll get it started.--Cúchullain t/c 22:01, 21 February 2020 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – March 2020
News and updates for administrators from the past month (February 2020).
|
- Following an RfC, the blocking policy was changed to state that sysops
must not
undo or alter CheckUser or Oversight blocks, rather thanshould not
. - A request for comment confirmed that sandboxes of established but inactive editors may not be blanked due solely to inactivity.
- Following an RfC, the blocking policy was changed to state that sysops
- Following a discussion, Twinkle's default CSD behavior will soon change, most likely this week. After the change, Twinkle will default to "tagging mode" if there is no CSD tag present, and default to "deletion mode" if there is a CSD tag present. You will be able to always default to "deletion mode" (the current behavior) using your Twinkle preferences.
- Following the 2020 Steward Elections, the following editors have been appointed as stewards: BRPever, Krd, Martin Urbanec, MusikAnimal, Sakretsu, Sotiale, and Tks4Fish. There are a total of seven editors that have been appointed as stewards, the most since 2014.
- The 2020 appointees for the Ombudsman commission are Ajraddatz and Uzoma Ozurumba; they will serve for one year.
Speedy deletion nomination of Abingdon station (disambiguation)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Abingdon station (disambiguation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an orphaned disambiguation page which either
- disambiguates only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic);
- disambiguates zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title; or
- is a redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" that does not target a disambiguation page or page that has a disambiguation-like function.
Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 19:35, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
"Informer (disambigution)" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the redirect Informer (disambigution) should be deleted, kept, or retargeted. It will be discussed at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 March 23#Informer (disambigution) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. 1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 23:04, 23 March 2020 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – April 2020
News and updates for administrators from the past month (March 2020).
|
- There is an ongoing request for comment to streamline the source deprecation and blacklisting process.
- There is a plan for new requirements for user signatures. You can give feedback.
- Following the banning of an editor by the WMF last year, the Arbitration Committee resolved to hold a
Arbcom RfC regarding on-wiki harassment
. A draft RfC has been posted at Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Anti-harassment RfC (Draft) and not open to comments from the community yet. Interested editors can comment on the RfC itself on its talk page.
- Following the banning of an editor by the WMF last year, the Arbitration Committee resolved to hold a
- The WMF has begun a pilot report of the pages most visited through various social media platforms to help with anti-vandalism and anti-disinformation efforts. The report is updated daily and will be available through the end of May.
Go Transit
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (Canadian stations)#Go station naming regarding station naming conventions for Go Transit. Cards84664 00:53, 3 April 2020 (UTC)
English pronunciation of Arthurian names
Hi Bill,
I was wondering if you knew of a good ref for this. Beside the Arthurian articles themselves, there are e.g. asteroids named after Arthurian figures, and the pronunciation is often opaque. — kwami (talk) 08:39, 4 April 2020 (UTC)
- Unfortunately I don't. There are so many different spellings, pronunciations and national differences that I don't think it's likely possible for any but perhaps the most well known figures.--Cúchullain t/c 22:56, 5 April 2020 (UTC)
Okay, thanks. — kwami (talk) 05:55, 6 April 2020 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Carlos (Calusa)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Carlos (Calusa) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of CaroleHenson -- CaroleHenson (talk) 21:41, 13 April 2020 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Carlos (Calusa)
The article Carlos (Calusa) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Carlos (Calusa) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of CaroleHenson -- CaroleHenson (talk) 00:02, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – May 2020
News and updates for administrators from the past month (April 2020).
- Discretionary sanctions have been authorized for all pages and edits related to COVID-19, to be logged at WP:GS/COVID19.
- Following a recent discussion on Meta-Wiki, the edit filter maintainer global group has been created.
- A request for comment has been proposed to create a new main page editor usergroup.
- A request for comment has been proposed to make the bureaucrat activity requirements more strict.
- The Editing team has been working on the talk pages project. You can review the proposed design and share your thoughts on the talk page.
- Enterprisey created a script that will show a link to the proper Special:Undelete page when viewing a since-deleted revision, see User:Enterprisey/link-deleted-revs.
- A request for comment closed with consensus to create a Village Pump-style page for communication with the Wikimedia Foundation.
Precious anniversary
Four years! |
---|
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:29, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Notice
I've restored this edit on WJCT (TV) (along with following WP:MOS's Sea of Blue rule). 107.242.113.16 (talk) 18:39, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – June 2020
News and updates for administrators from the past month (May 2020).
- CaptainEek • Creffett • Cwmhiraeth
- Anna Frodesiak • Buckshot06 • Ronhjones • SQL
- A request for comment asks whether the Unblock Ticket Request System (UTRS) should allowed any unblock request or just private appeals.
- The Wikimedia Foundation announced that they will develop a universal code of conduct for all WMF projects. There is an open local discussion regarding the same.
Category:Folk songs by nationality has been nominated for renaming
Category:Folk songs by nationality has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. 1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 17:09, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – July 2020
News and updates for administrators from the past month (June 2020).
- A request for comment is in progress to remove the T2 (template that misrepresents established policy) speedy deletion criterion.
- Protection templates on mainspace pages are now automatically added by User:MusikBot II (BRFA).
- Following the banning of an editor by the WMF last year, the Arbitration Committee resolved to hold an
RfC regarding on-wiki harassment
. The RfC has been posted at Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Anti-harassment RfC and is open to comments from the community. - The Medicine case was closed, with a remedy authorizing standard discretionary sanctions for
all discussions about pharmaceutical drug prices and pricing and for edits adding, changing, or removing pharmaceutical drug prices or pricing from articles
.
- Following the banning of an editor by the WMF last year, the Arbitration Committee resolved to hold an
"Goidel" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Goidel. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 July 3#Goidel until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Soumya-8974 talk contribs subpages 17:51, 3 July 2020 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – August 2020
News and updates for administrators from the past month (July 2020).
- There is an open request for comment to decide whether to increase the minimum duration a sanction discussion has to remain open (currently 24 hours).
- Speedy deletion criterion T2 (template that misrepresents established policy) has been repealed following a request for comment.
- Speedy deletion criterion X2 (pages created by the content translation tool) has been repealed following a discussion.
- There is a proposal to restrict proposed deletion to confirmed users.
LGBT-free zones
I was hoping that you'd agree with me and make the target a singular noun, as we often do. Not a big deal, just wanted to make sure you saw what I wrote. —Soap— 20:50, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
- You're quite right. I'll move it now.--Cúchullain t/c 20:50, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
- Actually, Wikipedia:Naming conventions (plurals) lays out the accepted guideline for this, and it states that an exception to the rule is "Articles on groups or classes of specific things." In this case, the article is about a specific class of zones in Poland, not unlike the examples given in the guideline. (t · c) buidhe 21:04, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
- I think they're more akin to say, powiat or gmina, which are singular, than things like States of Nigeria.--Cúchullain t/c 22:24, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
- Actually, Wikipedia:Naming conventions (plurals) lays out the accepted guideline for this, and it states that an exception to the rule is "Articles on groups or classes of specific things." In this case, the article is about a specific class of zones in Poland, not unlike the examples given in the guideline. (t · c) buidhe 21:04, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
Jubilee station (Calgary)
Hi there,
I noticed you are the one who changed the station/article to be Jubilee station. I was wondering if you could fix it back to SAIT/AUArts/Jubilee. I know you said you looked at Google News, which I don't know about but I honestly have never heard it be called "jubilee station" and I went to SAIT for a long time. I don't know how to go about that, I tried a page move but there was something preventing me from doing it. --MattBinYYC (talk) 22:08, 22 August 2020 (UTC)
- MattBinYYC, I see it's already been moved. I based the title on a Google News search, and while "Jubilee station" shows up more frequently, they're very close and there aren't that many sources at all. So no objection from me to the move, I bow to folks with better local knowledge.--Cúchullain t/c 18:27, 24 August 2020 (UTC)
American Samoa
Hi, Cuchullain. Regarding your closure at Talk:Futiga, could I ask if there's any detail you might be able to add regarding the closing rationale? You correctly note that the respondents (myself among them) disagreed, but it might be helpful to know how the considerations brought up in the discussion were weighed. Thank you! ╠╣uw [talk] 16:57, 24 August 2020 (UTC)
- Huwmanbeing: Of course, I'll add some more detail in a bit.--Cúchullain t/c 18:28, 24 August 2020 (UTC)
Portugal. The Man
Asking you because you closed the move, not because I think you have any interest in the page itself. A few years back there was a proposal to change the page Portugal. The Man to remove the punctuation, which did not get a consensus. This summer, a user removed all the punctuation from the article itself (although did not change the page title) with the argument that "those stupid periods make this article impossible to read." I'd like to revert those changes and suggest that this be proposed as another move if the editor feels a change is needed since the last discussion. However, there have been multiple technical edits since that one, so I did not want to undo, but wanted to see if there was an easy way to do that that does not remove all the other edits done since that you are aware of?--Yaksar (let's chat) 19:21, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
- Whoops. You can ignore this. Turned out it was much easier to change than I thought.--Yaksar (let's chat) 19:25, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – September 2020
News and updates for administrators from the past month (August 2020).
- Following a request for comment, the minimum length for site ban discussions was increased to 72 hours, up from 24.
- A request for comment is ongoing to determine whether paid editors
must
orshould
use the articles for creation process. - A request for comment is open to resolve inconsistencies between the draftification and alternative to deletion processes.
- A request for comment is open to provide an opportunity to amend the structure, rules, and procedures of the 2020 English Wikipedia Arbitration Committee election and to resolve any issues not covered by existing rules.
- An open request for comment asks whether active Arbitrators may serve on the Trust and Safety Case Review Committee or Ombudsman commission.
"One Loudoun" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect One Loudoun. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 September 25#One Loudoun until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Vahurzpu (talk) 16:05, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – September 2020
News and updates for administrators from the past month (September 2020).
- Ajpolino • LuK3
- Jackmcbarn
- Ad Orientem • Harej • Lid • Lomn • Mentoz86 • Oliver Pereira • XJaM
- There'sNoTime → TheresNoTime
- A request for comment found consensus that incubation as an alternative to deletion should generally only be recommended when draftification is appropriate, namely
1) if the result of a deletion discussion is to draftify; or 2) if the article is newly created
.
- A request for comment found consensus that incubation as an alternative to deletion should generally only be recommended when draftification is appropriate, namely
- The filter log now provides links to view diffs of deleted revisions (phab:T261630).
- The 2020 CheckUser and Oversight appointment process has begun. The community consultation period will take place from September 27th to October 7th.
- Following a request for comment, sitting Committee members may not serve on either the Ombuds Commission or the WMF Case Review Committee. The Arbitration Committee passed a motion implementing those results into their procedures.
- The Universal Code of Conduct draft is open for community review and comment until October 6th, 2020.
- Office actions may now be appealed to the Interim Trust & Safety Case Review Committee.
Administrators' newsletter – November 2020
News and updates for administrators from the past month (October 2020).
Interface administrator changes
|
|
- Community sanctions now authorize administrators to place under indefinite semiprotection
any article on a beauty pageant, or biography of a person known as a beauty pageant contestant, which has been edited by a sockpuppet account or logged-out sockpuppet
, to be logged at WP:GS/PAGEANT.
- Community sanctions now authorize administrators to place under indefinite semiprotection
- Sysops will once again be able to view the deleted history of JS/CSS pages; this was restricted to interface administrators when that group was introduced.
- Twinkle's block module now includes the ability to note the specific case when applying a discretionary sanctions block and/or template.
- Sysops will be able to use Special:CreateLocalAccount to create a local account for a global user that is prevented from auto-creation locally (such as by a filter or range block). Administrators that are not sure if such a creation is appropriate should contact a checkuser.
- The 2020 Arbitration Committee Elections process has begun. Eligible editors will be able to nominate themselves as candidates from November 8 through November 17. The voting period will run from November 23 through December 6.
- The Anti-harassment RfC has concluded with a summary of the feedback provided.
- A reminder that
standard discretionary sanctions are authorized for all edits about, and all pages related to post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people.
(American Politics 2 Arbitration case).
- A reminder that
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:The Temptation of Saint Anthony (book) § Requested move 29 November 2020. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 09:46, 29 November 2020 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – December 2020
News and updates for administrators from the past month (November 2020).
- Andrwsc • Anetode • GoldenRing • JzG • LinguistAtLarge • Nehrams2020
Interface administrator changes
- There is a request for comment in progress to either remove T3 (duplicated and hardcoded instances) as a speedy deletion criterion or eliminate its seven-day waiting period.
- Voting for proposals in the 2021 Community Wishlist Survey, which determines what software the Wikimedia Foundation's Community Tech team will work on next year, will take place from 8 December through 21 December. In particular, there are sections regarding administrators and anti-harassment.
- Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee Elections is open to eligible editors until Monday 23:59, 7 December 2020 UTC. Please review the candidates and, if you wish to do so, submit your choices on the voting page.
Page views and primary topics
In the edit summary here you say that the people are getting 2/3 of the pageviews. That may have been technically true last year, but only because of three unusual spikes in traffic. If you take them out, you'll see that the people and the language receive very similar views: you can try a narrower range [2] outside of these spikes, or a broader one, where one-off traffic events would tend to cancel out [3]. In either case, the people get less than 60% of the views. – Uanfala (talk) 20:28, 2 January 2021 (UTC)
- FWIW, the people article gets more views most of the time. For a given user searching with “Chochenyo” it’s more likely that they’re looking for the people than not. For the minority that isn’t, they’re one click away from their language destination whether we send them to a dab page or the people article. So the primary topic configuration is an improvement for the majority and neutral for the minority compared to the dab page configuration. The dab page configuration is a step backwards for the majority, and no improvement for the minority. —В²C ☎ 05:37, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
- Agree with Born2cycle on this one. Getting 67% of the traffic in a WP:TWODABS situation suggests the previous setup was working, especially as the language could be accessed as easily from a hatnote as from a dab page.--Cúchullain t/c 19:24, 4 January 2021 (UTC)
- FWIW, the people article gets more views most of the time. For a given user searching with “Chochenyo” it’s more likely that they’re looking for the people than not. For the minority that isn’t, they’re one click away from their language destination whether we send them to a dab page or the people article. So the primary topic configuration is an improvement for the majority and neutral for the minority compared to the dab page configuration. The dab page configuration is a step backwards for the majority, and no improvement for the minority. —В²C ☎ 05:37, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
Also, would you be able to clarify what statistics you're using here? Wherever I look, I only see figures around 58–59% for the people. – Uanfala (talk) 20:32, 2 January 2021 (UTC)
- 51% is a primary topic in a two dab situation, per the above reasoning. Any move like this is clearly potentially controversial; it needs to go through RM. Good revert. —В²C ☎ 05:40, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
- Yes, those sound similar to the numbers I found the other day using the tool. In a WP:TWODABS situation that's generally considered a primary topic case.--Cúchullain t/c 19:24, 4 January 2021 (UTC)
- Tagging Born2cycle as there is now an RM for Guenoa.--Cúchullain t/c 18:30, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
- Yes, those sound similar to the numbers I found the other day using the tool. In a WP:TWODABS situation that's generally considered a primary topic case.--Cúchullain t/c 19:24, 4 January 2021 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for January 3
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Huambisa, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Quechua. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:17, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – January 2021
News and updates for administrators from the past month (December 2020).
|
|
- Speedy deletion criterion T3 (duplication and hardcoded instances) has been repealed following a request for comment.
- You can now put pages on your watchlist for a limited period of time.
- By motion, standard discretionary sanctions have been temporarily authorized
for all pages relating to the Horn of Africa (defined as including Ethiopia, Somalia, Eritrea, Djibouti, and adjoining areas if involved in related disputes)
. The effectiveness of the discretionary sanctions can be evaluated on the request by any editor after March 1, 2021 (or sooner if for a good reason). - Following the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections, the following editors have been appointed to the Arbitration Committee: Barkeep49, BDD, Bradv, CaptainEek, L235, Maxim, Primefac.
- By motion, standard discretionary sanctions have been temporarily authorized
Happy New Year and thanks!
Hi Cuchullain! Having been elected to ArbCom, I was looking back at my RfA nostalgically the other day, and realized we haven't crossed paths much since I stopped being very active at RM. Just wanted to send well wishes for the new year and thanks—I wouldn't be where I am if not for you! --BDD (talk) 19:58, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
- Hi BDD, I'm sorry I missed this message! Thanks for kind words and the well wishes! I've been meaning to drop you a line to congratulate you on your Arbcom election. It's so nice to see you taking on that task, I know you'll serve the encyclopedia well there, just as you have as an editor and admin. Thanks again and happy 2021!--Cúchullain t/c 23:29, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
gnosisquest
Why did u ban her? she was trying to prove muhammad's (saw) innocence. I looked them up and they are all authentic and i have the link. if i put them in will u unban her? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 35.143.148.76 (talk) 22:09, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
- I didn't block them, and they're not blocked now. It appears their account has never been blocked.--Cúchullain t/c 23:47, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
Why is this the only article in those categories not to include the word "American"? Even the United States men's national American football team article includes it, and that's the last nation you'd expect to need the "American" qualifier. – PeeJay 21:56, 17 January 2021 (UTC)
- Sorry for the delay, PeeJay. Yes, the reason I reverted was because of the previous RMs. I'll respond to your new one.--Cúchullain t/c 15:38, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
Gnosisquest
Do u even remember who i am talking about? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2603:9000:A70B:F293:97C:5E98:B02B:7678 (talk) 18:54, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
- I don't, but looking at the logs for Gnosisquest shows that they've never been blocked.--Cúchullain t/c 17:13, 25 January 2021 (UTC)