User talk:Ctka

Welcome...

Hello, Ctka, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! Abbott75 ☺ 10:49, 18 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Polygraph

In 2008, you added or changed two quotes in the National Academy of Sciences section. What are the page number(s) in the referenced report for those quotes?TheTruth-2009 (talk) 05:37, 4 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Voice stress analysis

Please refrain from making non-constructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Voice stress analysis. Specifically:

Sites with user-generated content, such as YouTube, are not reliable under WP:USERG. If the Zimmerman interview is authentic, then a reliable, secondary source should be provided to establish this. Did you not read this in the edit summary with which I reverted this material the first time? When reverting an edit, please specify your rationale for doing so in an edit summary, and/or discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page.
Citations should generally be presented in the form of an inline citation, which you can learn to make here.
The POLY-VSA website indicates that the two portions of the abbreviated name of that organization are indeed separated by a hyphen and are not joined.

In addition, you need to improve your writing skills:

A video of an event recorded earlier is not "live". To watch something live means to see it as it is occurring.
The word deceptive is not a proper noun, or even a noun at all. It's an adjective, and therefore, is not capitalized.
Sentences do not begin with lowercase letters. When using the term i.e., it should be include a period after each of the two letters, and is not used to begin a sentence, as indicated here.
One does not refer a source. One refers to a source.

If you're going to contribute to encyclopedia, you should be able to exhibit a better grasp of the basic fundamentals of writing than this. If you can't, then you need to reevaluate whether you're qualified to contribute to an encyclopedia. Nightscream (talk) 12:48, 13 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. You removed content from Wikipedia with this edit of yours to Voice stress analysis, but without providing a rationale for this in an Edit Summary. When removing material, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you ever have any other questions about editing, or need help regarding the site's policies, just let me know by leaving a message for me in a new section at the bottom of my talk page. Thanks. Nightscream (talk) 19:43, 1 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add uncited material to articles, under deceptive edit summaries as you did with this edit, you may be blocked from editing Please do not make that necessary. You've been advised of Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Please adhere to them. Thank you. Nightscream (talk) 22:56, 28 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

September 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Voice stress analysis may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

of +3 to -3.<ref> Coetzee, C. (2000). Truth Extraction: Eyes, Lies, Analyse ISBN 978-0-620-524131-1]</ref>

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 11:06, 1 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Voice polygraph

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Voice polygraph, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. WWGB (talk) 11:23, 1 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]