User talk:Ctbolt

This user may have left Wikipedia. Ctbolt has not edited Wikipedia since 6 May 2022. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.

If you return to editing please remove the above template. Welcome!

Hello, Ctbolt, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! --Astrokey44 08:22, 11 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Uranium

Thank you for all your great feedback on the uranium FAC. Even though the article is now featured, I will still try to address the points you raised over the next week or so. Again, thanks! :) BTW, the next element article I plan to bring to FA quality is silver and/or plutonium. --mav 05:39, 5 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No worries Mav, I'll copy it over to the talk page so others can view. - ctbolt

Commons upload request

Hi Ctbolt, I notice that you have uploaded an image on Wikipedia and linked that image to Coleambally. A number of editors are currently attempting to catalogue a full list of images on commons at Towns of the Riverina, New South Wales and your image would be a great addition to that catalogue. If you are willing could you please upload your image to Commons (unless you already have) and then link it to the town page that it relates to? You will need an account at Commons to do this. If you need any help please just ask and I will be happy to assist where I can. --VS ^talk 10:43, 6 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I think I've done it - Ctbolt 10:56, 6 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

So you have - well partly. I put a category on the image (which you can see at the bottom of the image) and then linked it to Towns of the Riverina, New South Wales - then adjusted the count by one extra (see the list for Coleambally - and also the aerial shot of Cootamundra). That way any photographs that you take of towns in the Riverina will stay together at Commons also. Feel free to copy the plan for your next upload. Cheers! --VS ^talk 11:32, 6 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Great job on Grong Grong pics - thanks. --VS ^talk 21:27, 6 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

An Invite to join Aviation WikiProject

Hi, you are cordially invited to join the Aviation WikiProject! We're a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to aviation. This includes aircraft, airports, airlines and other topics.

As you have shown an interest in List of aircraft of the RAAF we thought you might like to take an interest in this new WikiProject.

You might like to take an extra interest in our Aircraft subproject

We look forward to welcoming you to the project! Trevor MacInnis (Contribs) 03:48, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Help

{Help Me} What's the easiest way to search for an image on en.wikipedia? I've tried en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Imagelist but there must be a better way? thanks - Ctbolt 04:12, 13 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

At the Wikipedia search page you can search just the image namespace (example). You can also use an external search engine to just search the image namespace (Google example). There is also the Mayflower search on the Toolserver, but that checks the Commons only.--Commander Keane 04:30, 13 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Commander Keane. Works well.

Note to self - press the search button then when the results come up check or uncheck the boxes at the bottom of the page (or change 'my preferences'). Google works well.

Navbox generic

In reply to your question about {{Navbox generic}} and making the list items left-aligned in User:Ctbolt/RAAF4, I looked at your template right after you asked and noticed you figured it out a few minutes later in this edit. There is still one small bit of code remaining from converting the table to a template: on the line that starts with |text-align = left|list1 =, you can remove |text-align = left. If you have any other questions, feel free to ask. – Zyxw 17:39, 18 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to VandalProof!

Thank you for your interest in VandalProof, Ctbolt! You have now been added to the list of authorized users, so if you haven't already, simply download and install VandalProof from our main page. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me or any other moderator, or you can post a message on the discussion page. Ale_Jrb ^talk 08:18, 11 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Anchor

Please reconsider your revert of anchor. There is no consensus on talk:anchor for removal of this content, which has been established unchallenged for quite some time. As such I consider the removal of such NPOV work to be vandalism. The recent controversy has been instigated externally (on a message board) by a commercial stakeholder (Alain POIRAUD) who seems unhappy with the position of his preferred brand on the comparison chart, and Russeaby who also appears to have an axe to grind.

Possibly the content can be expanded or better covered, but its complete removal to appease an injured biased party does not seem reasonable.

bad·monkey _{talk to the {:()} :: 03:23, 14 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The person who made the most sense was editor Hoof Hearted. I'd rather see Consensus reached before the re-addition of the content. - Ctbolt 03:53, 14 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Since you took a recent interest in this article I am hoping you can come take a look. I changes some content, specificly some link spam and added breif mentions of other modern anchors. The COI editor User:Badmonkey undid my revisions. If you have the time please see recent discussion on the talk page and my edits. I am trying to keep this civil, but it is stressful working against a representitive from an anchor company hell bent on making sure he gets as much advertising as possible in this article. Russeasby 03:08, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

See this incident at the COI noticeboard please. Russeasby, along with Alain POIRAUD, is intent on altering the article to suit his own opinions. bad·monkey _{talk to the {:()} :: 03:12, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I am editing the article for neutrality, I have no COI as both Badmonkey and Alain do. I commend Alain for at least keeping suggestions to the talk page and not trying to edit the article directly (though he has attempted editing in the past). I agree with neither of these users editing this article and I remain a neautral third party with no specific bias to either of their products, I am simply trying to maintain NPOV here. Russeasby 03:15, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

“commercial stakeholder”

I’m sorry to be again directly attacked by Badmonkey.

I came on this dispute on my exact name. I’m the designer of both the Spade and the Sword anchor, but since last year, I’m retired and pensioned. The Spade company doesn’t any longer exist. The Spade anchor has been sold to a new owner and I don’t have anymore commercial, marketing or financial interest with any anchor manufacturer.

The term “commercial stakeholder” is wrong and can be considered as a personal insult.

Yes the content can be expanded or better covered and I have made the following proposal:

1° - First to remove the photo of the Rocna and to replace it by, for example the Bügel which has been on the Market for at least 10 years, and which is more representative of the “modern” anchors (I may supply the photos)

I suggest also to change the existing text for the following one:

In recent years, there has been something of a spurt in anchor design. Primarily designed to set very quickly, then generate high holding power, these anchors (mostly proprietary inventions still under patent) are finding homes with users of small to medium sized vessels.

• The German designed Bügel, first built by steel producer WASI, has a sharp tip for penetrating weed, and features a roll-bar which orients the anchor to the correct attitude on the seabed

• The Bulwagga is a unique design featuring three flukes instead of the regular two. It has performed well in tests by independent sources.

• The Spade is a French design which has proved successful since 1996. This anchor features a demountable shank and the choice of galvanized steel, stainless steel, or aluminium construction.

• Several new models such as: - the French (Sword) - from New Zealand (Rocna – Manson Supreme) - Australia (SARCA) or - South America (Araia), recently appeared on the market. Although having only little experience, these new models seem to have excellent characteristics of penetration and holding and could become the modern anchors of the future.

• All links to Manufacturers web sites should be removed

I will be very pleased to receive your comments to my proposal.

(this proposal has also been sent to Badmonkey)

Alain Poiraud Hylas 04:18, 15 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

personally I think yourself and badmonkey should stay away from the page altogether. - Ctbolt 04:21, 15 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

this is not the question!,

As a consensus has to be found, I've tried to make a proposal for a new modified text AS NEUTRAL as possible..

I have submited this proposal to both yourself, Badmonkey and Russeaby and also on the Anchor discussion page.

This is (I believe) the first atempt to find a consensus to solve this problem.

Alain Poiraud Hylas 04:34, 15 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Tornado Alley

I've reverted your request for citation on Tornado Alley (book) as there is no need to cite a books dedication page. 23skidoo 15:31, 15 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Cleanup templates

Just to let you know that most cleanup templates, like "unreferenced", "fact", "cleanup" etc., are best not "subst"ed. See WP:SUBST for more details. Regards, Rich Farmbrough, 11:52 18 April 2007 (GMT).

thanks, I'll work it out soon - Ctbolt 11:54, 18 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Blackpool

You removed the name of the band Skrewdriver from the list of notable residents in Blackpool, citing it as vandalizm. I should point out however, that the user who added this did not vandalize the page, as Ian Stuart Donaldson was a founding member of the band Skrewdriver. A quick check of the Skrewdriver article would confirm this. I have therefore reverted your edit.♦Tangerines BFC ♦·Talk 14:48, 18 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No worries Tangerine.

Vote for the Worst revision

When you reverted the edit on the Vote for the Worst page, your reverted it to another instance of vandalism (though small)

I caught that, and got it taken care of. :) Whammies Were Here (PYLrulz) 22:08, 18 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

onya whammie

RFC for User Conduct of User:Badmonkey

An RFC has been opened for User Conduct of User:Badmonkey. Since you have been involved at some point in trying resolve a dispute with this editor I am bringing this to your attension. Note the instructings in the RFC instruct me to leave a note on the talk page of anyone who has tried to resolve this dispute and I am not WP:CANVASSing. I request you take a look at Wikipedia:Requests_for_comment/Badmonkey and act or comment as you deem appropriate. Russeasby 00:33, 23 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of Marc Dagenais

Hey, I was just wondering what exactly was the problem with this article... I'm rather new to this site so if you could provide a more detailed explanation rather than just "it is not acceptable according to the deletion policy"... thanks —The preceding unsigned comment was added by TSchabbs (talk • contribs) 15:45, 26 April 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Deletion of Marc Dagenais..

Thats's exactly what I don't understand, is it the references part, because if so I can edit it and add some sources where he can be found, but I've looked at other people who are on wikipedia and I think this looks the same as them all. I wrote about his background and what he does, and I don't see how this is any different from any other people on wikipedia. I don't know if you can tell me what part exactly i can change because i really don't have a clue what's wrong... if you have time could you get back to me on that, it would be greatly appreciated. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by TSchabbs (talk • contribs) 16:09, 27 April 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Wikipedia:WikiProject Cricket

Hey, I noticed that you contribute to cricket related articles. We have a project here, in wikipedia that aims to improve cricket related articles. We would like to invite you to join us. Just add your name to this list and add the project to your watchlist for latest scoop on what's happening around the project!--THUG CHILD z 04:25, 29 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hey since, you're going to all the wc pages and adding the player of the tournament, would you add the runners-up and the runners-up count too?--THUG CHILD z 04:45, 29 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Can do.

thanks

Alright, now i understand. I will get on that right away. Thanks a lot for the explanation it was really helpful. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by TSchabbs (talk • contribs) 16:09, 30 April 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Mary Poppins Links

Hello. My name is Greg Carlson (I edit as Unclepooch and am the administrator for one of the Wikimedia projects's Wikia) and I am curious why the Mary Poppins article does not have any external links. I thought that the one I added to an excellent article on Literary Traveler complied with Wikipedia policy. Let me know, thanks.

can't open it greg.

Daniele Sepe

I hope my changes are okay now. I just completed a group's name and corrected mistakes in the discography. If the links are not relevant, delete them, but I think Weblinks should been shown at the end of the article. If you want to discuss this, you can do it here or here. sorry, if I have done too many mistakes, I'm German With best regards, --88.65.78.210 14:23, 13 May 2007 (UTC) (Mascobado)[reply]

Fair enough, I probably reverted too far. My view on the external links is that they should take the reader directly to further information on the topic that "could not be added to the article for reasons such as copyright or amount of detail; or other meaningful, relevant content that is not suitable for inclusion in an article for reasons unrelated to their reliability (such as reviews and interviews)"WP:EL. The links have to add to encyclopaedic knowledge and be from an acceptable source. Having links just because they are official or from myspace or anything else is just contributing to a link farm and probably aren't the best sources (especially blogs or an official site written by the artist himself - not reliable!)Ctbolt 03:01, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Holdenlogo.png

Hello, Ctbolt. An automated process has found and removed an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, and thus is being used under fair use that was in your userspace. The image (Image:Holdenlogo.png) was found at the following location: User:Ctbolt/ToDo/v82. This image or media was attempted to be removed per criterion number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media was replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. Please find a free image or media to replace it with, and or remove the image from your userspace. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 08:00, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Merrylands, New South Wales

Regarding the Merrylands, New South Wales article, we must have reverted at the same time - please don't think I've reverted you're revert! The IP made a stupid edit prior to his latest, so I reverted that too. Happy editing! Lra drama 11:43, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

no worries, killing time in Perth qantas club at the moment.

North Perth

Good to see youre keeping on top of it there - have you ever considered the Perth or WA projects at all? Satu Suro 13:14, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

thanks suru, but not at the moment.

No problems - but if and whenever if you ever so feel like it - well they are there. cheers Satu Suro 13:19, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WP:AIV Request

Thank you for making a report about 66.230.200.146 (talk · contribs · block log) on Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism. Reporting and removing vandalism is vital to the functioning of Wikipedia and all users are encouraged to revert, warn, and report vandalism. However, administrators are generally only able to block users if they have received a recent final warning (one that mentions that the user may be blocked) and they have recently vandalized after that warning was given. The reported user has not yet been blocked because it appears this has not occurred yet. If this user continues to vandalize even after their final warning, please report them to the AIV noticeboard again. I see no evidence of a block notice - and not much (if any) vandalism -- wrp103 (Bill Pringle) ^(Talk) 21:56, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I am not sure what is going on. There isn't a block on, and the talk page was only changed once, for a low-level uw message. If it is a shared IP, then you will see a mix of legit & vandal edits. -- wrp103 (Bill Pringle) ^(Talk) 22:09, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

yep, I realise they'll be a mix. Anyway it seems to be blocked now - all a bit strange.

Bangalore

Hey, Can you explain why you reverted me? Nikkul's edits of the pics border on nonsense as I will soon explain on the Bangalore talk page. Stop reverting blindly. Sarvagnya 22:42, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

settle down bucko, if you haven't noticed there is quite a bit of vandalism on that page.

guess you've been here long enough and you should know what is vandalism and what is not. and oh.. turn down your swagger.. will ya? Sarvagnya

Sortable wikitable

I was wondering if you know how to default a specific column in ascending or descending order--Langloisrg 14:09, 19 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

good question. seems to default to what is entered in the raw edit page. And it's not easy to change due to the alternating lines/rows needed for seperations in the table (not easy to sort in MS Excel). And I don't know of any code to automatically make it ascending or descending when the page is loaded. sorry. - Ctbolt 00:33, 20 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use disputed for Image:AspleyHSlogo.png

Thanks for uploading Image:AspleyHSlogo.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:56, 16 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:AspleyHSlogo.png)

Thanks for uploading Image:AspleyHSlogo.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 05:37, 25 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Domesticated guineafowl

Thank you for reverting the deletion of the link to the Guinea Fowl International Association website in the Domesticated guineafowl article. As I'm sure you've noticed, this happens quite often, and the GFIA appreciates your help in monitoring this sad situation of continuing vandalism. Birdsarecool (talk) 18:02, 26 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 6

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Eucalyptus patens

added a link pointing to Blackbutt

Eucalyptus todtiana

added a link pointing to Blackbutt

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:15, 6 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Ctbolt. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

RC Patrol-related Proposals in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey

Greetings Recent Changes Patrollers!

This is a one-time-only message to inform you about technical proposals related to Recent Changes Patrol in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey that I think you may be interested in reviewing and perhaps even voting for:

Further, there are more than 20 proposals related to Watchlists in general that you may be interested in reviewing. (and over 260 proposals in all, across many aspects of wikis)

Thank you for your consideration. Please note that voting for proposals continues through December 12, 2016.

Note: You received this message because you have transcluded {{User wikipedia/RC Patrol}} (user box) on your user page. Since this message is "one-time-only" there is no opt out for future mailings.

Best regards, Stevietheman — Delivered: 01:10, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Survey Invite

I'm working on a study of political motivations and how they affect editing. I'd like to ask you to take a survey. The survey should take no more than 1-2 minutes. Your survey responses will be kept private. Our project is documented at https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research:Wikipedia_%2B_Politics.

Survey Link: http://uchicago.co1.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_9S3JByWf57fXEkR?Q_DL=56np5HpEZWkMlr7_9S3JByWf57fXEkR_MLRP_6Gr6elIZrYs4DI1&Q_CHL=gl

I am asking you to participate in this study because you are a frequent editor of pages on Wikipedia that are of political interest. We would like to learn about your experiences in dealing with editors of different political orientations.

Sincere thanks for your help! Porteclefs (talk) 14:03, 7 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Ctbolt. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Ctbolt. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please help with usability testing

Hello! The mw:Anti-Harassment Tools team is running a usability test to find out how and where IP addresses are used when patrolling wikis, particularly when patrolling RecentChanges. This could include New Pages or RecentChanges patrol. We want to see your patrolling process and get your views on some prototypes. Getting your perspective would be really helpful to us at this stage of the process. If you’d like to help, and have 30 minutes to spare, please fill out this Google form with your details: https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSfjYyRNGMkO4_TdNOgG4qmK9cp9YOKzM4GFO5pTd_bEcu23YQ/viewform

For the purpose of the tests we’ll be using Google Forms for recruitment, and UserTesting.com to conduct the actual tests. Please review the privacy statement and release form in https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ijmwrIoNO0W1p_zfFU1LBf3_6mFF53kUUFy1L_DCUKc (Google docs link)

Thank you,

NKohli (WMF) (talk) and PSaxena (WMF) (talk) 03:45, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]