User talk:Csatlos

Your submission at Articles for creation

William Northrop, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

SarahStierch (talk) 00:36, 30 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

William Northrop

Why do you keep breaking the reflist template?— alf laylah wa laylah (talk) 16:21, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you can describe what you're trying to do I can help you, but can't you see how what you keep doing is really messing up the article?— alf laylah wa laylah (talk) 16:27, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Refrences

Template:Refrences, Template:Refrences1, Template:Refrences2 and Template:Reflist1 have been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. AussieLegend (✉) 11:48, 15 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Template:Refrences1

A tag has been placed on Template:Refrences1 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion because it is an unused duplicate of another template, or a hard-coded instance of another template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is not actually the same as the other template noted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page explaining how this one is different so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{substituted}}</noinclude>).

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page's talk page, where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Eye snore (pc) 02:31, 20 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Template:Refrences2

A tag has been placed on Template:Refrences2 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion because it is an unused duplicate of another template, or a hard-coded instance of another template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is not actually the same as the other template noted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page explaining how this one is different so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{substituted}}</noinclude>).

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page's talk page, where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Eye snore (pc) 02:32, 20 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

August 2014

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to William Northrop has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: William Northrop was changed by Csatlos (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.878287 on 2014-08-16T00:56:24+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 00:56, 16 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to William Northrop. Flyer22 (talk) 02:06, 16 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to William Northrop. Flyer22 (talk) 02:28, 16 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for Vandalism. If you wish to make useful contributions, you may do so when the block expires. If you feel this block is unjustified, you may contest it by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 02:37, 16 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please read WP:OWN and WP:EW. After expiration of this block, please take your concerns to Talk:William Northrop. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 02:40, 16 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Came here to say the same thing. We are interested in getting the article right but deletion isn't the answer. Since this is a BLP I think some leeway is called for so if you note which portions of the article should be removed/changed, I'll post your comments to the talk page. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 02:47, 16 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Csatlos (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

You are taking an article I wrote the truth on and have allowed others to turn my article into a brawling point that has no basis on truth or definitive evidence. Good job Wikipedia, you have shown your true self. I would like my article deleted.

Decline reason:

Wikipedia is not based on 'the truth' Wikipedia is based on verifiability. As noted above the way forwards is through discussion once your block expires - but statements like the one above are not, I'm afraid, going to get the block shortened. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 06:12, 16 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.