User talk:Crzrussian/Archive 29

Charles Borromeo

The Charles Borromeo page was renamed without any discussion. Please restore Charles Borromeo (Italian saint) to its original name. Even if the other article about the Indian athlete is found to be notable, the renaming should be handled differently and not simply by a single user's fiat. For example, perhaps the {{moveto}} template should have been used to alert people that a major chnage to a major saint was about to be made. --evrik ^(talk) 15:09, 14 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I did a google search on Charles Borromeo. I wasn't trying to make a WP:POINT. While the athlete may be notable in some fashion, the saint's article was renamed, and a disambig page was made for an article that was less than a stub. I think it was more disruptive to have made that unilateral move. The way the article was moved should be addressed by reverting the name change and let the people who want the name change make their point. --evrik ^(talk) 15:18, 14 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for making the name change. I'll post a comment to the afd page. --evrik ^(talk) 15:32, 14 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

An almost irrelevant okay from me too. The athlete is not very famous in India except with a small crowd who is seriously interested in athletics. I remember him because the 1982 games was the first Asian Games that I followed. Tintin (talk) 15:59, 14 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Btw, for matters involving India, please also drop a word in WT:INB. It will help to avoid unnecessary friction and ego clashes. Tintin (talk) 16:06, 14 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Indian honours system

Why propose renaming only 2 sub-categories of "awardees" to "recipients"? It'll make the rest look untidy! :) --Mereda 17:59, 14 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ah! Problem. Most of these nominated categories have not got the proper cfr notice on them yet, and the one for Padma Shri does not route automatically to the Arjuna section heading.--Mereda 08:20, 15 November 2006 (UTC) It should be fixable ...[reply]
- But I could only see an ugly slow way of fixing it by relisting the whole set under today's date, so I needed to pass the buck. Sorry if anything sounded like sarcasm. --Mereda 12:37, 15 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Thurbert Baker.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Thurbert Baker.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Chowbok ☠ 18:16, 14 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of Uncle Mart User Page

Apparently you took the liberty of Deleting this users OWN page, as well as banning his IP address, as well as his user name, under the accusation of him being trolling. Care to elaborate further on the matter? (Cloud02 20:36, 14 November 2006 (UTC))[reply]

Nope! - crz crztalk 21:18, 14 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

History log shows changes to his page so its clear you're full of it, also there are NO incedents of him trolling before you started saying he was trolling, seems like a rouge wikiadmin to me, I bet money he banned you from isonews because you asked for the sims or something retarded. 211.176.9.184 11:50, 15 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oh yea, sims, I really want sims. Please please give me sims from isonews! </facetious> Get off my talkpage. Cheers. - crz crztalk 12:25, 15 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Funny, he asked you exactly the same thing on his user page yet you kept defacing it(although I suspect you'll edit the history or something to try and cover it up). Obviously you're not capable of being a wiki admin and should be removed and replaced by someone who can do a better job, you also sound like a five year old with your "clever" retorts, incedently no I wont leave your talk page (and I bet nobody else will either) as its here for that exact reason, to talk about things. "Cheers" 211.176.9.184 12:56, 15 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the welcome.

I was just curious what triggered your adding the welcome message to my discussion page?

Also I see that you are a 3L at FLS. I too went there - graduated in 2005. Good luck with the Job hunt if you dont have one yet. Feel free to write back. I am still a relatively new wiki user. Guedalia D'Montenegro 01:52, 15 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Presumably Orthodox, lol. Yes I think I am going to start describing myself that way. Be careful, not everyone interested in Rabbis is Ortho. I happen to be. In anycase - yes went to FLS - worked for a bit, failed the bar (twice) now I am out of work and considering a new line of work or more schooling. Sad story of those who don's shape up while in Law School. Soon you will have finals - how sad. But know this - you gotta pass that Bar..no law school final will remotely compare to the bar. Well - nice meeting you anways - feel free to write anytime.Guedalia D'Montenegro 02:08, 15 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Leon Tuhan-Baranowski

It is a pity that you deleted the article on Polish-Belarusian chess player Leon Tuhan-Baranowski only because of your nescience of a language. Mibelz 16:44, 15 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

FYI

Heads up: Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Second_opinion_on_matter. Newyorkbrad 16:56, 15 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

From one Alumnus to another.

Just wanted to say hey. I see that you are currently going to Fordham Law. So did I. With that knowledge, I guess you're one of the few people who'll get my username. Ramsquire ^{(throw me a line)} 18:56, 15 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Cali's great. Can't beat the weather. I can't remember the last time it rained. I'm doing PI out here. It's a pretty busy practice but I like it. Well good luck in your final year, and you can always ask me for any advice on passing the Bar. Ramsquire ^{(throw me a line)} 19:28, 15 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

10 rue Pavée

Hey crz, can you help me with this User:DVD R W/Synagogue de la rue Pavée à Paris? DVD+ R/W 19:36, 15 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It is notable for being a building and Monument historique by architect Hector Guimard, and other reasons too that I don't know yet. The article needs better vocabulary though, and yes sources. I'll look into sources and names, if you do the vocab? Consistoire, cultuel, and liturgiques, all sound very Catholic to me when they should sound Jewish. I just found an even smaller version pl:Synagoga de la rue Pavée w Paryżu. Here's another one I want to bring over next fr:Synagogue de la rue des Tournelles à Paris. DVD+ R/W 19:54, 15 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

So far I've just found this in Paris travel guides. I'm sure it is in some of my architecture books, but they're all boxed up and my nearest library sucks. How about this [1] ? It is named Agudath Hakehilot and called the largest synagogue in the Pletzl (the yiddish speaking district in Paris). Also has anecdotes about Guimard's wife, a Yom Kippur 1940 dynamiting, and restoration. DVD+ R/W 20:41, 15 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Any more thoughts on this? I found two refs. What do you think about the name? DVD+ R/W 23:23, 15 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ice skating

Really? I'll swing by this Sunday and check it out! ^_^ --Uncle Ed 19:56, 15 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

request move

i am doing a revamp on allot of the jewish community articles. i.e. 'history of french jews' has been moved to 'french jewery'. In other words i would like the articles on each of the communities to be more in touch with what they are now and their demographics, and to have a history paragraph/s like in any article.

now i would like to move 'british jews' to 'British Jewry' but i need admin rights. please assist.

Shkoiach!

Chavatshimshon 20:33, 15 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, i created a new article World Jewry. i also moved 'History of the Jews in Russia and the Soviet Union' to 'russian jewry', I would like to start a new wikiproject called world Jewry and gather all the articles on the Jewish communities around the world so they all present an opening description including the demographics and historical background... unless you think its not needed. in the meantime please can you move amercan jews to 'american jewry'. shkoiach. Chavatshimshon 04:38, 16 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

no im not. im from the uk, and its late here. ok so no wikiproject for that then, but i would like some help from the frum team on here, or stam jewish, to categorise the jewish communities worlwide and the demographics sheboi!

RFA Thanks

Thanks!
Thanks for your input on my (nearly recent) Request for adminship, which regretfully achived no consensus, with votes of 68/28/2. I am grateful for the input received, both positive and in opposition, and I'd like to thank you for your participation.
Georgewilliamherbert 04:57, 16 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

please can you look at the world jewry article and tell me if im doing it right. i hyperlinked four countries in the list so far, but they lead to the articles on their jewish communities without being apparent. shkoiach. Chavatshimshon 07:18, 16 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

me again

, i uploaded an image to the Rogatchover Gaon called RogatchoverGaon.jpg, its not working, again. what are my doing wrong? ta Chavatshimshon 07:28, 16 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Jewry

Hi. The word "Jewry" is a standard scarecrow of antisemitic writings. It is seldom used in scholarly works and I don't think it is an appropriate term for an encyclopedia. Beit Or 14:14, 16 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This statement is ignorance of the highest order. The articles the way they are titled is simply bad English. British Jews for example is not English, British Jewry, is English and is a term used every week in Newspapers here such as the Jewish Tribune amongst many others. Chavatshimshon 15:34, 16 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

World Jewry Showdown

OK hi, please disregard my previous messages.

British and American Jewry dont exist anymore, they have been changed back to 'British Jews' etc. These terms are clearly not gramaticly correct.

I made a new category to replace the confusing "[Country] Jews" category which has been here for a number of years. I have been reading wikipedia for three years and the fact there is no cleancut category for jewish population articles always troubled me. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:World_Jewry

I hope we can open a discussion on this. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:World_Jewry

Chavatshimshon 16:06, 16 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

NYC Meetup

Yes it is. —ExplorerCDT 23:50, 16 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Pinkerton v. US

Yep, I'm a 1L. Actually we had just finished discussing Pinkerton in my Criminal Law class and I had a break between classes so I thought I'd add it to the wiki.

I've found that if I can find the case on wikipedia, it makes it a lot easier to understand compared to simply reading the opinion so hopefully I'll help out some future 1Ls.

(SSJPabs 00:12, 17 November 2006 (UTC))[reply]

[Statement of gratitude]

[Unique statement of excitement]!

[Your username name, not subst:ed properly], [statement of gratitude] for [your specific vote] in [link to request for adminship], which passed with a final tally of [final tally][percent in parentheses (optional)]. I plan to [statement of intentions regarding admin tools] and [statement acknowledging oppose votes as helpful]. If you [type of desire for help] or want to provide any [type of feedback], feel free to [link to talk page or e-mail]. [Statement of gratitude, again (optional)] [signature of new admin]

Because people often complain that RfA thank-you messages are impersonal, I thought I'd give you the opportunity to create your own. -- tariqabjotu 04:09, 17 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

And, if I haven't said so already, [statement of gratitude] for nominating me! -- tariqabjotu 04:09, 17 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Would you mind mediating on the Rush Limbaugh page?

Hi. You were very constructive in mediating a dispute I was involved in on the Mark Levin Talk Page some months back. There is currently an reversion war taking place on the Rush Limbaugh page regarding an incident where he insulted the looks of the pre-adolescent Chelsea Clinton on his national television show.

A group of pro-Limbaugh editors has been removing the material from the page, often dismissing arguments to keep the section, or proclaiming that "consensus has been reached" when the discussion is still taking place.

Would you mind stopping by and bringing some objective discourse to the page? Eleemosynary 04:12, 17 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Advice

Or alternately, we could have him speedy delete a speedy delete template. --Aguerriero (talk) 04:27, 17 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No, it seems too busy. I would say limit to wikilinks only - see Template:Michigan State University. --Aguerriero (talk) 04:34, 17 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

What on earth? --Aguerriero (talk) 04:39, 17 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This is Arizona - I'm sure any shipments of that book are already being rerouted to California. :) --Aguerriero (talk) 04:44, 17 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Erm

WTF?? LOL... - crz crztalk 05:26, 17 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I felt the page needed a little humour :) -- Tawker 05:28, 17 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Host desecration

I need the assistance of an administrator at Host desecration.--Lance ^talk 10:36, 17 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Circular Eguiaz

The circular argument "Eguiaz invented.... is not logic.Is the term correct to define the phenomen? this is the question on the subject.Circular deletion is oft used in science when the referee have not true arguments

tour management system

Hi There... I'm fairly new to Wikipedia and posted a short article on "Tour management systems" with the hope that other people would elaborate. I noticed it got deleted but I can't seem to find out why? Can you let me know what was wrong with the article so I can correct the problem(s) and repost it. Thanks. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by sentias (talk • contribs) .

Replied on your talk page. - crz crztalk 17:11, 17 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the quick response. I've just learned a new word :-) I would argue that it is similar to Content Management System which already exists in Wikipedia, however, Tour Management Systems are specifically designed for tour companies the same way e-commerce solutions are designed for retailers. Please post it to AFD and I will do my best to justify its inclusion. Sentias 17:18, 17 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Mr. Crack

The article had no claim of notability, other than "known locally for a white van". However, since it is my first day as admin, I will take a defensive posture, restore it, and send it to AFD :-) -- ReyBrujo 04:46, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I couldn't find a reasonable item to apply at Wikipedia:Undeletion policy. Would you agree to send the article to Wikipedia:Deletion review instead? -- ReyBrujo 04:56, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Gotcha. Well, as I said, I will be conservative, and will follow advices from more experiences users during my first weeks. Thanks for the clarification! -- ReyBrujo 05:03, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Good to see admins that don't bite new admins :) By the way, could you review this? Gm1121983 (talk · contribs) requested MFD for his user page, which another user turned into U1. However, checking the user's talk page, he was harassed by Mariusz Zielinski (talk · contribs), currently blocked, and apparently now by Mariusz Paul Zielinski (talk · contribs). I would like to know what you would do here, thanks! -- ReyBrujo 05:20, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please listen to yourself

Talk about biting the newcomers yourself.. I only started editing wikipedia new pages about a month ago, and it's not like your comment on my talk page was very respectful to a newcomer.. Ardo 05:56, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Host desecration

I need the assistance of an administrator at Host desecration; my attempt to edit this article is being reverted resulting in a supression of fact that attempts to whitewash catholic antisemitism. Please read the discussion page and the edit history for the article. Thank you in advance for the assistance.--Lance ^talk 16:32, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

That's exactly the problem; I don't know what policies and procedures to assert and effect. The problem is that well established historical facts are not in the article; in the historical literature, this is not a controversial subject. The two editors that are provoking conflict here are doing so purely in the defense of their personal religious opinions.--Lance ^talk 16:49, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Wayne Stenehjem.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Wayne Stenehjem.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Chowbok ☠ 18:36, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Deletion log screenshot.PNG

Howdy. I was rather disappointed that you withdrew from the ArbCom(m) election, but I'll write apropos of that in greater detail some other time. In the meanwhile, though, I thought I ought to observe that you have the honor of being the deleting admin depicted on the image supra, which screenshot appears at Wikipedia:Why was my page deleted?. I'm quite surprised you haven't already gotten a message from some insufficiently attentive user who fails properly to read the Why was...? page and presumes that you speedied his/her brilliant content; I suppose you might merit such criticism in any event, though, because, whilst you may not delete something yourself, you must be held responsible as part of the cabal of Jews that Бора́т Сагди́ев informs me rules the 'pedia. :) Joe 19:24, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Indenting the Meatpuppets

Thank you for your attention on the ZineWiki AfD page. However, while you were indenting the "meatpuppets" on the discussion page, you forgot a few: User:AJMS (who's only contribution to Wikipedia has been to nominate the article for deletion) and User:Notth (who made fewer than three other edits to Wikipedia, ever.) If you're going to be a fair admin, you can't only point out the new accounts voting to keep, you must please, in the future, acknowledge those voting to delete as well. Alanlastufka 22:56, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Rudolf Steiners views on race and ethnicity

Hello Crzrussian,

You have deleted the article, but many of us felt some of the information needed to be merged into the main article. Is there an archive where the previous article can be viewed while the information is merged? Thanks in advance. Pete K 22:58, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, me again. Since the article is named in the arbitration, and a good portion of the agressive editing went on there, I'd like to have access to collect diffs from the article and the discussion pages related to the article. If you could make it accessible in locked-up form, it would be extremely helpful during the arbitration process. Thanks! Pete K 13:36, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Holy crap

Ever have one of those days when you stumble on an entire legion of non-notable articles, all linked together and maintained by the same editors, that need to be deleted? Check out Saddle Creek Records and everything linked from its template at the bottom. Also, check out basically all the contributions of Arman pablico (talk · contribs) --Aguerriero (talk) 02:15, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

John Hall (musician)

We were discussing the potential move of John Hall (musician) on the talk page. Wouldn't it have been appropriate to add your opinion to the discussion there, rather than arbitrarily making the move and ignoring the discussion? Simon12 04:44, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Do you want to undo? John Hall (New York) isn't a bad option. Why don't you put your rational for making it on the talk page. If folks agree, then we've reached a post-move consensus anyway! Simon12 04:49, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I went to Stuy, '78.Simon12 04:53, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

WP:ANI

Your name has come up in a thread on ANI (you won't have any trouble finding it). I hope what I wrote is okay with you. Regards, Newyorkbrad 04:55, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I rather agreed with the point you made at Ardo's talk page and even with the stridency with which you made it, although I thought you might better have set forth what it was that you thought to be wrong with his application of speedy tags, as well you have done now. I was altogether surprised, though; the Crz whom I knew back in the day was an irreformable deletionist—on more than one occasion a Monicasdude antagonist—who never met a candidate for speedy deletion he didn't like. If you continue to progress in this manner, you might someday be able to handle what little power you have in life; at the very least, should I ever succeed at RfA, you'll no longer, I suppose, be the worst admin wiki has... :) Joe 07:38, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You've got a fan (per above)

Looks like Uncle Mart is dedicating himself to warning people about you. Gee, he seemed like such a nice guy, too. Fan-1967 05:03, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

More Limbaugh

When you have a moment, would you mind commenting on the sources WillyWonty has provided on the Limbaugh Talk Page making the case that his insulting of Chelsea Clinton is notable, as it is still frequently mentioned in sourced reportage and discussion of Limbaugh's ad hominem methods? Thanks. Eleemosynary 10:04, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted article Josh Hunt

You deleted this article on the 9th because it was a non notable bio. Do you mind looking at the previous versions? It used to be a serious article about a footballer. Cheers. Reyk _YO! 11:23, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

My RfA

I've accepted and posted your nomination. Thanks very much! Kafziel ^Talk 14:33, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Drive-by Revert

Can you explain why you did this without using Discussion? Thanks.Kiyosaki 20:27, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

From Daniele.tampieri

Thank you very much! :) I enjoy wikipedia very much: I am very content-oriented so my style is sometymes bad. Please feel free to correct me and give me advices. Again thank you! :) —The preceding unsigned comment was added by daniele.tampieri (talk • contribs) . I am sorry I forgot to sign: let me remedy. --Daniele.tampieri 20:52, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom

Thanks again for your extremely kind words. Next year, I promise!

By the way, there's another thread about you running, this time on WP:AN. You seem to be making your share of friends.... :) Newyorkbrad 22:59, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Kafziel 2

Thanks for your note. Seems to be passing OK anyway. 17-4 at this point. That's what I love about Wikipedia-- important decisons are made by consensus. Consensus, and AfD in particular, may not be perfect, but it works better than a lot of other decison making processes.

I do have the greatest admiration for you, and it pains me to be in disagreement. Just because we disagree does not mean we have to be disagreeable. Highest regards. Cheers, :) Dlohcierekim 23:40, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

SELEX: Systematic Evolution of Ligands by Exponential Enrichment

Hey dude. It's a good start on a very neat concept: small nucleide chains fighting in test tubes to see which has the best chance of being a drug. Like American Idol for oligonucleotides. I'll change the title to Systematic Evolution of Ligands by Exponential Enrichment and redirect SELEX. Wish I had the knowledge base to make this a better article -- Samir धर्म 00:43, 21 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sort of borderline: there's 144 PubMed hits on it, and it's an older technology that's becoming more en vogue. User:ClockworkSoul or User:Opabinia regalis would probably have a better feel on it than me. Cheers -- Samir धर्म 00:46, 21 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

"Nice"

After receiving an anonymous message from some user, you posted the following: "nice... :) - crz crztalk 05:00, 20 November 2006 (UTC)" Are you saying something there?

Also in your apology (which I have read and thank you for posting), you said that you saw 2 warnings for violating BITE or tagging articles too quickly and generously, and that's why you upgraded your message to a warning. Where are those warnings?? Ard0 01:14, 21 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I was just looking over CSD and noticed that subst:prod|reason exists. Maybe I should start using that instead of DB unless vandalism is apparent. Good plan?Ard0 03:03, 21 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Will do! :) Ard0 03:05, 21 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]