User talk:CrisAtNiedaxGroup

Your username

Welcome to Wikipedia. I saw that you edited or created Draft:Niedax Group, and I noticed that your username, "NiedaxGroup", may not comply with our username policy. Please note that you may not use a username that represents the name of a company, group, organization, product, service, or website. Examples of usernames that are not allowed include "XYZ Company", "MyWidgetsUSA.com", and "Foobar Museum of Art". However, you are permitted to use a username that contains such a name if it identifies you individually (not your role), such as "Sara Smith at XYZ Company", "Mark at WidgetsUSA", or "FoobarFan87", but not "SEO Manager at XYZ Company".

Please also note that Wikipedia does not allow accounts to be shared by multiple people and that you may not advocate for or promote any company, group, organization, product, service, or website, regardless of your username. Please also read our paid editing policy and our conflict of interest guideline. If you are a single individual and are willing to contribute to Wikipedia in an unbiased manner, please request a change of username by completing the form at Special:GlobalRenameRequest, choosing a username that complies with our username policy. Alternatively, you can just create a new account and use that for editing. If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. Thank you. Jay 💬 15:22, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Correction. User did not edit or create, but requested the undeletion of the draft. Jay 💬 15:25, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Jay, Thank you for your advice. I will adapt the username properly. I also did some amendments on the German post - do you know how long the review takes? NiedaxGroup (talk) 13:58, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Review takes a few days, sometimes it happens on the same day as the submission, but as this draft was already reviewed and changes will only be incremental, review should be faster. The draft does not use the same sources as the German article. Jay 💬 08:48, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks @Jay - It took some time for me to update also the sources, which is now done. CrisAtNiedaxGroup (talk) 16:32, 25 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Niedax Group (August 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by UtherSRG were:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please read and understand WP:42 for what quality of references we are looking for; current references fail the WP:SIRS check. You would do well also to read WP:BACKWARD and start fresh from the correct sources, get main space article approval, then expand with additional sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Niedax Group and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

UtherSRG (talk) 12:25, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, CrisAtNiedaxGroup! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! UtherSRG (talk) 12:25, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Good morning @UtherSRG, thank you for doing the review and your feedback. As I'm a newbie working with Wikipedia, I'm keen to learn and improve. Thank you also for the several WP links in the green box. As the company (disclaimer: I'm working for) has not so many external mentions YET - but we're working on it -, I'm wondering if it would be better to first start a Wikipedia entry and add additional sources over time, rather than not having a Wikipedia entry at all. Maybe you can have an advice?

Also there's already an existing Wikipedia entry in German language (https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Niedax_Group) that accepted the external sources accourding to the Wikipedia rules.

Regarding the peacock terms, I will revise and adjust where necessary.

Happy to get your feedback on this again - thanks! CrisAtNiedaxGroup (talk) 12:52, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Each language Wiki has its own set of policies and guidelines, so it matters not at all that the German Wiki has the article accepted. Also, we don't care about helping to promote a company; what we care about is what is written by independent, reliable sources that provide significant coverage of the topic, as listed at WP:SIRS. Failing that, there is no way to accept the draft. Do read WP:42 and WP:BACKWARD and understand what is being said there in full. As prescribed by WP:BACKWARD, I suggest gathering the required references first, and restarting the draft with information from those sources. If you can not find an appropriate set of sources, then you should abandon the draft and move on to something else. - UtherSRG (talk) 14:29, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]