User talk:Creamy64

Welcome to Wikipedia, & the Creamy Army. Hooker. Creamy3 (talk) 23:11, 26 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Remember...

...that this is an encyclopedia, not Myspace or somewhere to chat with your friends. If you fail to edit constructively, you will be blocked. John Reaves 16:30, 28 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Creamy3 for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. Blueboy 96 20:50, 4 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

_GB^T/C 18:33, 5 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Creamy64 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

You can't block me for being part of the Creamy Army. I have not vandalized anything... The only page I have editted was the Meriwether band article and I only added legitimate information. I am no sock puppet. I'm a different person.

Decline reason:

Oh, there's one non-vandal creamy army member? No thanks. --jpgordon^∇∆∇∆ 22:37, 8 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.