User talk:Crazynas/June2006

Beer page Links revert

Hi Crazynas! I noticed you just reverted some perfectly good beer links which had been moved from the Beer Portal to the Beer page. This was done using VandalProof. You might need to check what your VandalProof is doing. Or have I missed something here? Cheers. 15:57, 1 June 2006 (UTC)

I downloaded VandalProof last night and I'm about to have a go tonight. Would you have any advice? SilkTork 17:51, 1 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Gotchi entry at Wikipedia

Could someone please explain to this author of the Wikipedia entry for 'Gotchi' why Wikipedia wizards are against neologisms?

The terms Wiki, Wikipedia, Wikipedians are all neologisms. To delete Gotchi would 'hoist Wikipedia by its own petard.' Look that up your Funk and Wagnells. Sometimes words are born. Gotchi is one. And it is useful and growing in usage.

Please let Gotchis live.

my CV:

http://datatecture.blogspot.com

and for some early early Web 2.0 Mashup (another neologism listed in Wikipedia), check my collabs:

http://www.unmovie.net - 2002

http://www.orbit.zkm.de - 2006 or on a mobile phone http://mobile.orbit.zkm.de

cheers, datatect

Help.

Hey...

I am one of the people who run the Darkonin, a kingdom in the online Mud Dark and Shattered Lands. Some people are trying to get it deleted due to lack of "notablility." I got your name off the World of Warcraft history, if you would post on the talk page about how it is sort of notable, as if that isn't notable, neither is anything about World of Warcraft, or many a fantastical novel.

Thanks.

User: RJII

Your guess is as good as mine. The guy claims not to be a Randist, but he acts just like them. He, along with LaszloWalrus, Imperator2, and The+Invisible+Man need to be watched for bias and vandalism, as they have all been responsible for one or both in some form. -- LGagnon 23:58, 2 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry if it came off as if I was implying that you were involved in their vandalism. My point is that we have a handful of Randists on Wikipedia who don't respect the NPOV rule, and both sides should watch them for bias and/or vandalism. I understand that not all Randists disrespect the rules; Jimbo, for instance, hasn't done anything unethical to the Rand articles. I may come off as if I don't have any trust for any Randist Wikipedians, but I'm really concerned with the few here that are too concerned with making their ideology look good and not with making good articles. They have managed to completely tilt the balance, and thus my main concern with these articles is to fix that problem. Hopefully as we add more references and reduce the vandalism that should come about. -- LGagnon 00:56, 3 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

My RfA

Thank you for supporting me in my recently unsuccessful RfA. I plan on working harder in the coming months so that I have a better chance of becoming an admin in the future. I hope that you will consider supporting me if I have another RfA. Thank you for your support. --digital_m e^(t/c) 15:32, 6 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a ton...

...for reverting vandalism on my userpage. Great day!! --Gurubrahma 09:46, 7 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

RFM

A request for mediation has been filed with the Mediation Committee that lists you as a party. The Mediation Committee requires that all parties listed in a mediation must be notified of the mediation. Please review the request at Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/Talk:Objectivism (Ayn Rand), and indicate whether you agree or refuse to mediate. If you are unfamiliar with mediation, please refer to Wikipedia:Mediation. There are only seven days for everyone to agree, so please check as soon as possible.

Thank you

Hi Crazynas/June2006, thank you for voting in my RFA which failed eventually at a result of (91/51/8). I do not plan to run for adminship until a later date. Once again, I would like to thank you for voting. --Terence Ong _{(talk | contribs)} 14:43, 13 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]