User talk:Crawl of the wild

Hello!

Hey, just wanted to let you know that I removed your trolling from Jimbo's talk page. I'm sure someone will be dumb enough to restore it for you. Happy editing. Bitter Oil (talk) 23:16, 15 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Did you seriously just call me a racist? Crawl of the wild (talk) 03:01, 16 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, did I get that wrong? Perhaps I misunderstood what you were trying to say. Are you a racist? Bitter Oil (talk) 03:16, 16 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Are you? Crawl of the wild (talk) 06:26, 16 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion at AN/I

I don't have time to babysit you until you inevitably get blocked, so I started a discussion here. Bye. Bitter Oil (talk) 05:57, 16 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

February 2020

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. In addition, your ability to edit your talk page has also been revoked.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then submit a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.

El_C 06:29, 16 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Kenneth John Freeman

The article Kenneth John Freeman has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The article is not a biography but instead a true-crime drama.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JBL (talk) 13:44, 16 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Kenneth John Freeman for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kenneth John Freeman is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kenneth John Freeman until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Neiltonks (talk) 16:26, 17 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry

You are suspected of sock puppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, then, if you wish to do so, respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Crawl of the wild. Thank you. Mr. Vernon (talk) 22:49, 17 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]