User talk:Crainee
Appearance
Hi Crainee! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 10:30, 21 March 2019 (UTC) |
Hi. It's always a good idea to create new articles in draft first if you are new to the project. When you've read the guidelines and improved the article, you can submit it for review by more experienced editors. Deb (talk) 17:04, 28 March 2019 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Lifelong Learning Platform (November 26)
[edit] Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Taewangkorea were:
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Lifelong Learning Platform and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Lifelong Learning Platform, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
- If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
Your submission at Articles for creation: Lifelong Learning Platform (February 4)
[edit] Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reasons left by Praxidicae were: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: this has been repeatedly submitted and deleted with absolutely no improvement or indication that its encyclopedic.
Praxidicae (talk) 16:00, 4 February 2020 (UTC)