User talk:Coylaxy

Welcome!

Hello, Coylaxy, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Battle of Mount Handrin, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.

Article development
Standard layout
Lead section
The perfect article
Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, ask me on my talk page. You can also type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Seawolf35 ^T--C 15:47, 21 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Battle of Mount Handrin

Thank you for your interest in Kurds and Kurdistan. Due to past disruption, a special set of rules apply to anyone editing in this topic area. Specifically, only extendedconfirmed editors are allowed to make direct edits and page creations to this topic area. Since you currently do not meet the requirements to contribute to this topic area, the page you created has been nominated for speedy deletion under G5.

If you think this page does not fall under the general sanctions described, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Additionally you may wish to read about the topic restrictions here and here. Seawolf35 ^T--C 15:47, 21 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to the topics of Kurds and Kurdistan, broadly construed, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

~ ONUnicorn^{(Talk|Contribs)}problem solving 19:21, 21 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: List of current equipment of the Peshmerga (December 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Praseodymium-141 was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:List of current equipment of the Peshmerga and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

¹⁴¹ Pr {contribs} 10:48, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Coylaxy! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! ¹⁴¹ Pr {contribs} 10:48, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

February 2024

Please do not add or change content, as you did at M4 Sherman, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Loafiewa (talk) 14:56, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, I Would Have Cited My Source, But it is a Book in Kurdish and I Don't Think It would be verifiable by an English Speaking individual. Coylaxy (talk) 15:12, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Consulate General of the United States, Erbil (March 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by User4edits was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

More WP:RS required.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Consulate General of the United States, Erbil and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Thanks, Please feel free to ping/mention -- User4edits (T) 06:21, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Coylaxy. Thank you for your work on Battle of Mount Handrin. North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Nice work

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 21:02, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@North8000: Thanks! Coylaxy (talk) 16:28, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@North8000: lil bro they completely vandalized the page and used pre existing sources as a source which completely invalidates their claim.

the battle of Sulaymaniyah was a Kurdish victory and the iraqis suffered large casualties (16,000 in detail).Coylaxy (talk) 18:19, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

shit Coylaxy (talk) 18:19, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@North8000: My Bad! DIDN'T MEAN TO TAG YOU :| Coylaxy (talk) 18:21, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

May 2024

Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Battle of Sulaymaniyah (1991), you may be blocked from editing. Skitash (talk) 11:25, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Skitash: lil bro they completely vandalized the page and used pre existing sources as a source which completely invalidates their claim.

the battle of Sulaymaniyah was a Kurdish victory and the iraqis suffered large casualties (16,000 in detail).Coylaxy (talk) 18:20, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Why don't you provide your sources? Skitash (talk) 18:43, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Skitash: The Source that you use proves my point.

The City was first under rebel rule then taken by the Baathists then after a fierce counterattack the city was liberated and under full rebel rule.

what you're doing is classic sock puppetry don't act like you aren't. Coylaxy (talk) 18:46, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Battle of Sulaymaniyah (1991) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Skitash (talk) 18:47, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Skitash: good one.

They rolled into zakho as it was the goverment counterattack but then retreated due to fierce clashes.

you're literally taking the source out of context to get what you want. Coylaxy (talk) 19:05, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

June 2024

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for contravening Wikipedia's policy against harassment.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. PhilKnight (talk) 13:15, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason to be Unlocked

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Coylaxy (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I Understand That What i did was wrong and there is no excuse for it, i will be more restraint in the future and make sure that my anger doesn't get in the way of my work, i apologies for the offensive language and it will NOT happen again i promise. i love Wikipedia and being able to make information more widely available, i promise i will remain professional in the future. Coylaxy (talk) 17:04, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

No thanks, no hate speech here. Yamla (talk) 18:04, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.