Jump to content

User talk:CorwenAv

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Although some prefer welcoming newcomers with cookies, I find fruit to be a healthier alternative.

Hello, CorwenAv, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like this place and decide to stay.



Why can't I edit some particular pages?
Some pages that have been vandalized repeatedly are semi-protected, meaning that editing by new or unregistered users is prohibited through technical measures. If you have an account that is four days old and has made at least 10 edits, then you can bypass semi-protection and edit any semi-protected page. Some pages, such as highly visible templates, are fully-protected, meaning that only administrators can edit them. If this is not the case, you may have been blocked or your IP address caught up in a range block.
Where can I experiment with editing Wikipedia?
Use the main sandbox or create your own personal sandbox to experiment.
How do I create an article?
See how to create your first article, then use the Article Wizard to create one, and add references to the article as explained below.
How do I create citations?
  1. Do a search on Google or your preferred search engine for the subject of the Wikipedia article that you want to create a citation for.
  2. Find a website that supports the claim you are trying to find a citation for.
  3. In a new tab/window, go to the citation generator, click on the 'An arbitrary website' bubble, and fill out as many fields as you can about the website you just found.
  4. Click the 'Get reference wiki text' button.
  5. Highlight, and then copy (Ctrl+C or Apple+C), the resulting text (it will be something like <ref> {{cite web | .... }}</ref>, copy the whole thing).
  6. In the Wikipedia article, after the claim you found a citation for, paste (Ctrl+V or Apple+V) the text you copied.
  7. If the article does not have a References or Notes section (or the like), add this to the bottom of the page, but above the External Links section and the categories:
==References==
{{Reflist}}
What is a WikiProject, and how do I join one?
A WikiProject is a group of editors that are interested in improving the coverage of certain topics on Wikipedia. (See this page for a complete list of WikiProjects.) If you would like to help, add your username to the list that is on the bottom of the WikiProject page.
[edit]

If you add a navbox to an article (such as Urban legends), the navbox must include the article. Please fix this so others don't have to do it. Thanks. Sundayclose (talk) 00:37, 13 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Incorrect edit summary

[edit]

In your edit summary for the St. Louis light article, you said you added an infobox. You did not add an infobox. You added a template. Since you're new, do you know what an infobox is? If not, go to WP:INFOBOX to learn what they are. Mr. C.C.Hey yo!I didn't do it! 03:31, 13 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I made a mistake in my description, sorry, I confused "infobox" and "navbox". CorwenAv (talk) 06:14, 13 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AfD

[edit]

I see that you just started. Can you please withdraw the proposal to delete an article, and get better informed about editing and processes first? Sourced information will not be deleted because you find it potentially misleading. -- Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:44, 14 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. This Afd is frivolous with no basis in Wikipedia policy. Please read WP:Deletion policy before making any more nominations for deletion. Sundayclose (talk) 15:01, 14 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

January 2023

[edit]

Information icon Welcome to Wikipedia. Wikipedia invites everyone to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, but one or more redirects you created have been considered disruptive and/or malicious, and have been reverted or deleted. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to the encyclopedia. Thank you.

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

— Archer1234 (talk) 02:52, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/TheCurrencyGuy

[edit]

 You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/TheCurrencyGuy. NotReallySoroka (talk) 05:58, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

[edit]
Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:TheCurrencyGuy per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/TheCurrencyGuy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.   -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (she|they|xe) 10:52, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

CorwenAv (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Block appears to be a result of obsession and bad faith on the part of several individuals CorwenAv (talk) 10:56, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I don't even understand what my original ban was for. All I did was revert a POV edit that was demonstrably wrong which NotReallySoroka arbitrarily declared was subject to 1RR (with no evidence whatsoever anywhere) and everyone eagerly jumped on my back to tear me to shreds. It was all a witch-hunt by him against me. I tried very hard to improve this website, but it seems certain attitudes are just far too engrained to have any hope of changing them. I still maintain I did nothing wrong and I have no idea why I've been pulverised. I made this account because I sincerely believed (and still do believe) the original ban was unjust. CorwenAv (talk) 13:07, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Look, I am unfamiliar with your previous account and its history. I do not know why you were blocked, and, frankly, that's immaterial here. If you are blocked, you may not create another account to keep editing. That's block evasion and will certainly lead to a block whenever you're discovered.
If you want to be unblocked, your best bet is the WP:STANDARDOFFER, but it requires you keep away from Wikipedia for at least six months; if you evade our block, the six months will reset. Also, you will have to prove that you understand what the problems were that led to your original block and to convince the reviewing admin that you will no longer edit disruptively once unblocked. I suggest that you read the explanations you were given as to why your behaviour was perceived as disruptive and try to take them to heart. Salvio giuliano 13:15, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The original ban was passed arbitrarily because a user declared unilaterally that an article was subject to a 1RR, even though it was not tagged as such, he just declared it to be so, and other users simply went along with his declaration. There was no possible way I could have avoided it because it was arbitrary. CorwenAv (talk) 13:19, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
If that's your approach, I am afraid you have little hope of having your block lifted... Salvio giuliano 13:20, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
But it is indeed the case. Surely there must be someone I can appeal to with the facts of the matter. CorwenAv (talk) 13:26, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, you can appeal to the community by filing an unblock request using your original account or you can go to WP:ARBCOM. However, if your argument is that you are totally innocent and you were railroaded, your appeal is likely to be rejected per WP:NOTTHEM as I did earlier or other flavours of the same concept, such as WP:1AM... And every rejected appeal and every case of block evasion is going to make it harder and harder to eventually have your block lifted... Salvio giuliano 13:32, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Stop hand
Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

 --jpgordon𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇 04:53, 13 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:CorwenAv&oldid=1140818291"