User talk:Coriantumr15

Topics I'm Tracking

Radical Islam

Shining a bright light on one of the most evil forces terrorizing the world today. Consider the following:

Disunity / Distrust of Allies - Saudi Arabia, Iran, and Islamic State are all regional powers with a nearly identical objective, creating a regional super state based on the principles of Islamic Sharia Law. Yet, somehow those principles have turned the three groups into fierce enemies of each other.
Female genital mutilation - A barbaric concept practiced in many Islamic countries on young children. Yet most other religions teach that "whosoever were to harm a little one, it would be better for them to be drowned in the depths of the sea."
Sharia Law - defines a corrupt legal system for it specifically does not provide EQUAL protection for all citizens of the planet earth. It provides legal justification to persecute women, minorities and non-believers.
Islamic terrorism - by definition, terrorist acts committed by Muslim groups or individuals who profess Islamic or Islamist motivations or goals. Islamic terrorists have relied on particular interpretations of the tenets of the Quran and the Hadith, citing these scriptures to justify violent tactics including mass murder, genocide, child-molestation and slavery.

Reference errors on 12 October

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the List of thwarted Islamist terrorist attacks page, your edit caused an unsupported parameter error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:23, 13 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia requires proper attribution

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Allegheny College into Timothy Alden (educator). While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was moved, attribution is not required. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 22:14, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem

In the same article, I detected that some of the prose was copied from http://web.archive.org/web/20160418211554/http://crawford.historicpa.net/content/biography/1499/alden-timothy, a copyright web page. All content you add to this wiki needs to be written in your own words please. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 22:30, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ezra Weston II

The article Ezra Weston II has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Robert McClenon (talk) 04:09, 2 February 2017 (UTC) I was not finished. You jumped on this page too soon. Coriantumr15 (talk) 04:14, 2 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User:Coriantumr15 - If you put incomplete articles in article space you can expect that they may be tagged for deletion. You may develop articles in progress in user space or in draft space. In article space, they are subject to tagging. The article now has references and is no longer tagged as an unsourced biography of a living person. Your removal of the tag was technically improper because you had not yet included the references. Robert McClenon (talk) 06:12, 2 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Re: List of thwarted Islamist terrorist attacks

Hi Coriantumr15,
Your edit to this page here left a lot to be desired. ie:

"... this plotted as stopped only at the airport checkin counter when a traveler attempted to checkin a bag that was suspiciously too heavy."

See here, where I 'fixed' it. It now reads:

"... the plot was stopped at the airport luggage check-in counter when a traveller attempted to check a bag that was too heavy."

Your earlier edit here was also flawed, for example "... city of Sidney" not Sydney. I have also altered that in my 'fix' edit above.

Please be more careful in future, double check your grammar, and please provide more source information then just the sources name, like date published, author/s if any and access date.
Regards, 220 of ^Borg 07:36, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Thank you for your help Coriantumr15 (talk) 19:44, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Coriantumr15. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 16

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Curtis Culwell Center attack, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page DOJ (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:12, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Coriantumr15. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Coriantumr15. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 23

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of thwarted Islamist terrorist attacks, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page NIA (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:45, 23 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:18, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:46, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Discretionary sanctions notification

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

FDW777 (talk) 17:48, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:46, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Rewards for Justice Terror List

The article Rewards for Justice Terror List has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Poorly sourced, potential source of BLP violations

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:47, 3 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

References, notability, YouTube stats, and categories

You created an article on Robert F. Sanders who has a YouTube channel. You need proper sources stating his notability. If not, it could fail WP:GNG and could be put up for deletion. Simply being on YouTube and having hits on Google doesn't make one notable. One appearance on a TV show also doesn't make him notable. You should have created the article in a draft while you worked on it to get it ready for mainspace.

When it comes to references, Apollo.io is not reliable as a reference. Apollo.io a lead intelligence and sales engagement platform trusted by nearly 9,000 paying customers, from rapidly growing startups to some of the largest global enterprises. It has been removed. You need more references. Failure to do so can lead to stuff potentially being removed. You want to make sure the article isn't poorly sourced.

When adding an infobox in regards to someone with a YouTube channel, you always add their channel(s)' stats to their infobox.

Before you create a category, you should see if the appropriate categories exist. If you do create categories, never leave them red linked. There is a category Journalists by subject which transportation journalists should be in. You need to also populate that category with other transportation journalists.

I know this is a lot of information, but that article needs a lot of work. Mr. C.C.^{Hey yo!}_{I didn't do it!} 05:27, 8 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I found two more strong references for Road Guy Rob at IMDB today. They are now added. When copying the "YouTube Channel" data from other YouTubers featured on Wikipedia - I see that Robert Sanders has a much bigger audience reach than those others featured already on Wikip. Coriantumr15 (talk) 17:21, 8 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

There are people with big audiences in their respective areas with millions of subscribers that don't have articles. IMDb is not a reliable source and is listed as such on WP:RSPSS. I have removed them. IMDb is user-generated meaning someone can submit edits to pages like a credit in an actor's filmography for example. You're failing to provide reliable sources. You need to get the article up to standard or it could be put up for deletion. Mr. C.C.^{Hey yo!}_{I didn't do it!} 21:45, 8 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You need to properly format sources. Just a link isn't enough. Go to WP:CITET for templates and what to add to for various citation templates for a particular reference. You linked to KSL. This KSL is a disambiguation page. You need to link to the TV station or radio station KSL. Mr. C.C.^{Hey yo!}_{I didn't do it!} 02:10, 10 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Rewards for Justice Terror List for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rewards for Justice Terror List is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rewards for Justice Terror List until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:50, 10 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Robert F. Sanders moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Robert F. Sanders, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 15:07, 15 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Robert F. Sanders (January 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by VickKiang was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Thank you for the article. However, the sources are trivial mentions and non-significant coverage, or non-independent sources (i.e., his YouTube channel and a piece Sanders wrote). This mentions Sanders four times but mainly discusses his videos instead of non-trivial details that could pass the basic biographical notability guideline. Therefore, WP:NBASIC likely is failed. He also contributed to BYU winning a minor award but overall Sanders does not appear to pass the creative notability guideline or any other biographical notability guideline. Thanks.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Robert F. Sanders and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

VickKiang (talk) 08:16, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Coriantumr15! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! VickKiang (talk) 08:16, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

May 2023

Hello. Your recent edit to List of Eagle Scouts appears to have added the name of a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person, organization or product added to a list should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. Thank you. Sundayclose (talk) 13:47, 4 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Robert F. Sanders

Hello, Coriantumr15. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Robert F. Sanders, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 09:01, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Robert F. Sanders

Hello, Coriantumr15. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Robert F. Sanders".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 08:24, 9 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of thwarted Islamic terrorist attacks for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of thwarted Islamic terrorist attacks is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of thwarted Islamic terrorist attacks until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

AlanS^talk 00:24, 31 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:45, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]