User talk:ConteRaff
Your article Barbera Caffè S.p.A.
[edit]Welcome, and thank you for contributing the page Barbera Caffè S.p.A. to Wikipedia. While you have added the page to the English version of Wikipedia, the article is not in English. We invite you to translate it into English. It currently has been listed at Pages Needing Translation, but if it is not translated within two weeks, the article will be listed for deletion. Thank you. - MrX 14:40, 27 June 2014 (UTC)
Welcome!
[edit]
|
Hi ConteRaff, welcome! And thank you for creating Barbera Caffè. However, two points. First, you seem to have got confused and also created the same article in Italian, Barbera Caffè S.p.A.. I believe you intended this for the Italian Wikipedia, but the Wikipedias in different languages are not automatically connected; you would need to create the article on the Italian Wikipedia, here. I am an administrator here on the English Wikipedia, and have deleted it because we already have your English-language version. The other thing is that you need to provide references, such as newspaper articles about the company or pages about it in books. On the English Wikipedia at least, this is expected. References do not have to be to things that are on-line, although if you can give a URL, that is appreciated. But they should not be to blogs or exclusively to the company's own website or to articles based on press releases. Has the company been written up in any local newspapers, or in business publications? I have given you some links above to pages that explain our policies and so on; you may also find this summary of the requirements for something to have a page useful; notice that it has links to explanations about such things as what we mean by reliable sources. Yngvadottir (talk) 15:11, 27 June 2014 (UTC)
Cafè Barbera Franchise
[edit]I merged and redirected your page to the parent topic, Barbera Caffè, because this topic is not nearly significant enough to justify two separate articles on what are essentially the exact same topic. This is the appropriate move; you will not find support among any editor here for the position that two articles should exist. Please leave the redirect in place. —Swpbtalk 19:31, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
- No, you can't get around it by creating a new page with almost the same title. Are you aware that any editor can see every edit you make? Has it sunk in yet that we enforce standards around here? Start following the rules, or find yourself blocked. —Swpbtalk 13:48, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
Speedy deletion of "CafeBarbera Franchise"
[edit]A page you created, CafeBarbera Franchise, has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it is obvious advertising or promotional material.
You are welcome to contribute content which complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.
Thank you. Haminoon (talk) 19:42, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Franchise Café Barbera
[edit]If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Franchise Café Barbera, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
- It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.
- It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Bazj (talk) 08:22, 24 November 2014 (UTC)
November 2014
[edit]Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia, as you did to Barbera Caffè. While objective prose about beliefs, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not intended to be a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. In the 6 months you've been editing Wikipedia every one of your edits has been about Barbera Caffè and its franchise operations. It's time to consider whether you're here to contribute to Wikipedia or to advertise your business. Bazj (talk) 10:13, 24 November 2014 (UTC)
Nomination of Barbera Caffè for deletion
[edit]A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Barbera Caffè is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Barbera Caffè until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Bazj (talk) 10:22, 24 November 2014 (UTC)
Warning
[edit]You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you create an inappropriate page, as you did at Barbera Caffè. Did you really think we wouldn't notice? —Swpbtalk 13:55, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
Si può essere bloccato dalla modifica senza preavviso ulteriormente la prossima volta che si crea una pagina inadeguato, come avete fatto a Barbera Caffè. Pensavate davvero che non avremmo notato? —Swpbtalk 13:58, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. -- Ed (Edgar181) 14:58, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. -- Ed (Edgar181) 13:56, 29 December 2014 (UTC)Speedy deletion nomination of Barbera coffee
[edit]If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Barbera coffee, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Dai Pritchard (talk) 11:34, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
Blocked
[edit]{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. - I've indefinitely blocked you from editing because ultimately you seem to be intent on one thing: creating a page for a specific company, which you've done at Barbera Caffè, Franchise Café Barbera, Barbera coffee, Barbera Coffee Co., and Barbera Caffè S.p.A., among other pages. You've created this page multiple times despite getting warned not to do this and despite getting blocked twice for doing this. I don't see where you really have any intention of making any other edits to Wikipedia, so I'm permanently blocking you. You can contest this, but you will have to genuinely show that you understand that you cannot re-add the article to Wikipedia and that you will not re-add the article until it has passed through deletion review. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 11:47, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
Sockpuppet investigation
[edit]Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/ConteRaff, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.