User talk:Conservative Steve

Welcome!

Hello, Conservative Steve, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as BitLife, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.

Article development
Standard layout
Lead section
The perfect article
Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, ask me on my talk page. You can also type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! MrOllie (talk) 23:56, 5 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Why was I blocked?

I was making good edits here? Conservative Steve (talk) 18:41, 21 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 18:42, 21 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

What did I do wrong? I thought I’ve been a good editor here? Conservative Steve (talk) 18:43, 21 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock Request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Conservative Steve (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I’m not sure why I was block. I thought I was contributing positively here. If I can be unblocked, I will continue my contributions in the field of history. Thank you. Conservative Steve (talk) 18:52, 21 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This was clearly spelled out to you above. Confirmed to long-term abuser, SteKelBry. Find another hobby, we aren't interested in your trolling here. I'll go mark you as banned. Yamla (talk) 18:55, 21 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

UTRS appeal #77678

is closed. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 23:04, 21 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

UTRS appeal #77789

is closed. WP:check user block, so meh. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:59, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]