User talk:Conscious/Archive7

/Archive1 /Archive2 /Archive3 /Archive4 /Archive5 /Archive6

Comic operas

I see you closed this Cfd on 21 May, but since then nothing has happened. I am supposed to do something? Thanks (the proposer) -- Kleinzach 04:02, 4 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Code of Riemann

I just discovered your amazing Image:Riemann_zeta_function_absolute_value.png. How did you make it? Perhaps with some Mathematica commands or so? Perhaps you can post the code, so that other (me?) can learn or improve. (I add the GNU R code to all my math images. Best, de:User:Thire aka --128.130.51.96 11:26, 11 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

okay, thanks. I started to work on this similar image: Image:Zeta-abs.png, --128.130.51.96 06:17, 12 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging Image:Peter Leko grandmaster.JPG

Привет. Это фото я получил, почти как подарок, от одного любителя шахмат и любителя фотографии. Этот любитель делал свои фотографии в течении нескольких лет на шахматных турнирах Chess Classic, которые раньше проводились во Франкфурте, а теперь проводятся в Майнце (Германия). Это не профессиональные фотографии. У меня они существуют в виде картинок на фотобумаге. Я их сканировал и затем загружал в Коммонс. Я спросил автора фотографий, могу ли я использовать их в Интернете. Он мне ответил, что я могу делать с его фотографиями всё что мне угодно. Поэтому, я считаю, что мы можем использовать эти фотографии в Википедии.--Ygrek 16:02, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Why U added NPOW to the article Red Army crimes in Lithuania?

Those bandits murdered my grandmother in March 1945. U must explain why that article is NPOV first. Stalin was stupid - even 24 mln russian solgers victims in II WW

Urba-na

Fair use rationale for Image:Wolverine_X-Men.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Wolverine_X-Men.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Videmus Omnia 03:29, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

List of authors whose works are in the public domain

A "{{prod}}" template has been added to the article List of authors whose works are in the public domain, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. ⇒ bsnowball 14:48, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

UMIST Category deletion: deletion review

An editor has asked for a deletion review of Category:University of Manchester Institute of Science and Technology. Since you closed the deletion discussion for this article or speedy-deleted it, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Dodo64 13:22, 29 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree Image:Naftovyk Ukrnafta logo.gif

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Naftovyk Ukrnafta logo.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. The Evil Spartan 17:02, 29 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Minneapolis

		The Original Barnstar
		To Conscious, on the occasion of Minneapolis, Minnesota reaching featured article. -Susanlesch 21:46, 1 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No fair use rational on Image:Wolverine X-Men.jpg

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Image:Wolverine X-Men.jpg, by Videmus Omnia (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Image:Wolverine X-Men.jpg is an unfree image with no fair use rationale uploaded after May 4, 2006 which has been tagged as not having a rationale for more than 7 days (CSD I6).

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Image:Wolverine X-Men.jpg, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it did not nominate Image:Wolverine X-Men.jpg itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --Android Mouse Bot 2 19:08, 4 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Uwsealsm.gif

Дорогой Conscious. Желаете следовать правилам с точностью до точки? - это ваше право. Я ни сколько не собираюсь вас осуждать за снятие шаблона {{NowCommons}} с данного изображения. Но параллельно, вместе с шаблоном, вы также снесли (переместили на отдалённую) важную информацию о наличии подобного изображения на Викискладе - установленная вами версия страницы описания вводит случайно зашедшего участника в заблуждение, например, он может подумать, что изображение удаляется по причине не правильной лицензии - вы не оставили никакой дополнительной информации о причинах удаления на старнице описания. Многие участники не заходят на соот.страницу обсуждения удаления изображения с целью экономии своего траффика. Alex Spade 12:57, 18 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

FC Zenit Saint Petersburg‎

...Я перепутал категории с секциями. :) Если есть желание высказаться по поводу секции трансферов/значимых игроков/единого формата, добро пожаловать на страницу обсуждения. — Ash063 06:31, 19 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

RustamKasimdzhanov.jpg

Please see my note on the talk page there. I am not an expert on templates, but please come back if there is something wrong and I will try to correct it. This image is a modified/cropped version of Rustam_Kasimdzhanov.jpg on Commons, created by User:Stefan64. Maybe you just wanted this information adding to the description - please feel free to do so. Regards Brittle heaven 23:40, 19 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Pillope

Hi Conscious. You removed the speedy deletion tag on Pillope, with the comment "not vandalism". Is adding bogus articles not vandalism? or do You have knowledge about a fruit called Pillope?

As mentioned on Talk:Pillope the content is taken from SEPASAL Database. I was trying to categorize the article, and when I couldn't find any thing about Pillope, I did a little research on the references given, which led me to that page.—Leo Laursen ( T | C ) 12:47, 22 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

OK, thanks. That also explains WP:V. I wasn't sure whether that was intended or a mistake. —Leo Laursen ( T | C ) 13:00, 22 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Archiving request

Thanks for deleting my archive that were out of date - wait a minute that doesn't sound right. Oh well, thanks anyway. Onnaghar^{tl ! co} 13:44, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use disputed for Image:Professional Rugby League logo.png

Thanks for uploading Image:Professional Rugby League logo.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 02:22, 6 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Last season's UEFA Champions League Group Stage Draw

Was there any reason why you deleted the Group Stage draw pot tables from last season's UEFA Champions League? The reason why I'm asking is that I've done the same to this season's and there are some people persistently reverting it. Kingjeff 02:28, 6 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:ArgGeo 11092007.svg

Hey. Thanks for helping with these diagrams I really appreciate it! Unfortunately there is an error in Image:ArgGeo 11092007.svg. Pichot did not play for Argentina. Would you be able to fix this then upload it again? You may want to double check other errors as well. Don't worry I mucked up one earlier also; fortunately Dale pointed it out to me! Thanks. - Shudde ^talk 02:36, 12 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Spetember

Thanks - version control error... Rich Farmbrough, 05:58 14 September 2007 (GMT).

Fair use disputed for Image:Houndsmall.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Houndsmall.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:36, 16 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

RfA thanks

Thank you very much for your support at my RfA. Regards, Jogers (talk) 09:45, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Featured pictures

Hello, please take a look at Wikipedia talk:Featured pictures#Mess with USS Shaw. Conscious 05:27, 18 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Did that answer your question? -- Esemono 10:48, 20 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Canada at the Rugby World Cup

Actually, as of this writing, Canada can achieve 2nd place in their pool. If they beat Japan and Australia, they can finish with 10 points. If Fiji also beats Wales and Australia, and denies each team a bonus point, then Fiji would win the pool and Australia, Wales, and Canada would be level at 10 points. With each of the three tied teams having beaten one of the others, it would be decided by scoring differences, and any of the three could come out on top. That said, I acknowledge that only two of these four results are plausible, and only one is likely.

Update: Oops...I see that you argued the same thing on the RWC 2007 discussion. Sorry. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Alanmjohnson (talk • contribs) 06:34, 21 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The now-traditional RFA thank-spam

Click there to open your card! → → →

Dear Conscious,

Thank you for your participation in my RFA, which closed successfully with 83 supports, 1 oppose, and 0 neutrals. No matter if you voted (I mean, "!voted") support or oppose, I thank you for taking the time to drop by. I'm new, remember, so if you have any suggestions feel free to inform me of them, and if I do anything wrong, feel free to add to the permanent chorus of disapproval on my talk page. Special thanks to Walton^One and Dihydrogen Monoxide for nominating me.

iridescent (talk to me!) 21:19, 20 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Credits

This design was ~~brazenly stolen from~~ inspired by Тhε Rαnδom Eδιτor's RFA Thanks, which in turn was inspired by Phaedriel's RFA thanks.

Image on commons

You reverted my edits. Image on commons has the same resolution but are bigger (368 KB on en wiki - 941 KB, on commons) - so that is the same image but with a diffrent compresion. So - image on commons has smaller compresion. Then can you tell me why you are not delete that image ? Pmgpmg 11:28, 23 September 2007 (UTC) PS. Reply on my talk page. I don`t check watchlist on en wiki.[reply]

USS Shaw explodes

How is your nomination to transfer the Featured Picture status different from mine?

Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/USS Shaw explodes

Why didn't you just comment onto mine? Why would you create a second nomination? -- Esemono 21:45, 24 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Russian Premier League map (image)

Hi, I saw your name on http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Russian_Premier_League_map.png as the uploader of that picture. As far as I understand, the image will be updated every season to show the current teams playing in Russian Premier League. I wanted to suggest to rename the image to Russian Premier League 2007 map, so it can be posted on Russian Premier League 2007 article, and the upload new images for every season. Since image pages cannot be renamed on Wikipedia, I would suggest re-uploading the current image under the "Russian Premier League 2007 map" name, and, maybe, delete the old one to avoid duplicate images. Please talk back on this! Thanks, Artyx^© 10:39, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, thanks! The images are here: Image:Russian_Premier_League_2006_map.png and Image:Russian_Premier_League_2007_map.png. Artyx^{T C} 09:30, 2 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:DeepImpact1.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:DeepImpact1.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 13:37, 26 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orpha Klinker

I noticed that you deleted Orpha Klinker article 30 January 2007. What was your reasoning for deletion? Thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Phil Fish (talk • contribs) 13:20, 28 October 2007 (UTC) --Phil Fish 13:26, 28 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Then there would not be a problem if I added a new page that I wrote myself? --Phil Fish 17:27, 28 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'll do my best, Thanks--Phil Fish 17:56, 28 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Featured List of the Day Experiment

There have been a series of proposals to initiate a Featured List of the Day on the main page. Numerous proposals have been put forth. After the third one failed, I audited all WP:FL's in order to begin an experiment in my own user space that will hopefully get it going. Today, it commences at WP:LOTD. Afterwards I created my experimental page, a new proposal was set forth to do a featured list that is strikingly similar to my own which is to do a user page experimental featured list, but no format has been confirmed and mechanism set in place. I continue to be willing to do the experiment myself and with this posting it commences. Please submit any list that you would like to have considered for list of the day in the month of January 2008 by the end of this month to WP:LOTD and its subpages. You may submit multiple lists for consideration.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:LOTD) 01:04, 16 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Eminem Infinite Cover.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Eminem Infinite Cover.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 07:25, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Logo of FC Mashuk-KMV Pyatigorsk.png)

Thanks for uploading Image:Logo of FC Mashuk-KMV Pyatigorsk.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 20:14, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

FIFA World Cup on FAR

FIFA World Cup is currently under Featured article review, but you don't seem to have been informed, even though you did a large proportion of the work to get it to FA. It's at Wikipedia:Featured article review/FIFA World Cup. In other matters, remember maybe a year ago when I asked you about possible connections between Manchester City and FC Moskva? Well they've only gone and done this! Oldelpaso 11:02, 1 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image of Flag of Ust-Orda Buryat Autonomous Okrug

I would like to discuss with you on this matter at the image talk page. American Imperialist (talk) 01:13, 9 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Current Extreme Canadian Championship Wrestling roster

A tag has been placed on Current Extreme Canadian Championship Wrestling roster requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Closedmouth (talk) 12:19, 22 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Acs.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Acs.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 06:23, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of List of To Heart cast members

An editor has nominated List of To Heart cast members, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of To Heart cast members and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 19:59, 8 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Taft.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Taft.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 06:24, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No content in Category:FC Moskva players

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Category:FC Moskva players, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Category:FC Moskva players has been empty for at least four days, and its only content has been links to parent categories. (CSD C1).

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Category:FC Moskva players, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 14:30, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

John S. Chen

I noticed you deleted the article on the notable founder of Sybase. {04:30, February 9, 2007 Conscious (Talk | contribs) deleted "John S. Chen" ‎ (Wikipedia:Copyright problems/2007 January 28/Articles)} This has left a red link in other articles. There was some mention of copyright problems. Would you mind explaining that problem? Thanks for your time. Brunon ia 00:45, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Helmet-Meantime.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Helmet-Meantime.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 23:03, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WP:LOTD

Congratulations! List of top-division football clubs in UEFA countries was selected as a List of the Day for April. Let me know if you have a strong preference for a date.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTD) 07:41, 23 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

William S. Powell

You deleted William S. Powell as a copyvio when the University of North Carolina Press failed to release the text of the article under the GFDL. http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&page=William_S._Powell I wanted to let you know that I have just finished creating a non-copyvio article on this historian which I hope adequately demonstrates his notability. --Eastmain (talk) 02:36, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keluo Khan

I just asked a question at Talk:Keluo Khan in response to a comment you made there two years ago. You may want to check it out because another editor has proposed the article for deletion. Phil Bridger (talk) 12:39, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of List of fictional magic users

I have nominated List of fictional magic users, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of fictional magic users. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Vivio Testarossa^{Talk Who} 11:58, 31 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of List of bus terminals in Moscow Oblast

I have nominated List of bus terminals in Moscow Oblast, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of bus terminals in Moscow Oblast. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. B. Wolterding (talk) 13:24, 12 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Logo of Spartak Nalchik.gif)

Thanks for uploading Image:Logo of Spartak Nalchik.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:36, 5 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of List of Mario cast members

I have nominated List of Mario cast members, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Mario cast members. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Judgesurreal777 (talk) 00:25, 23 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

FIDE Grand Prix 2008-2009

If you haven't seen it already, see my comments at Talk:FIDE Grand Prix 2008-2009. I'm especially intereseted in your feedback because I deleted your charts. Peter Ballard (talk) 06:20, 12 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Grandmasters

Hi, I noticed your recent contribution on the article World Chess Championship 1990. Nice work, I find these knockout diagrams hard to make! Lately, I have been working on the List of chess grandmasters, and I was wondering if you could help me. There are a few grandmasters still missing birth dates. Since you read Russian, you might be able to find some of the birth dates that I was unable to find. Would you mind, in particular, having a google search for:

Salauat Izmukhambetov (????.??.??)
Alibek Ibragimov (????.??.??)
Aidyn Guseinov (1952.??.??)
Nebojsa Nikcevic (1965.??.??)

Thanks a lot! Voorlandt (talk) 09:55, 15 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much for checking and the information on Guseinov. I suspected he had died from the FIDE records, but couldn't find a reference for it. Best regards, Voorlandt (talk) 12:22, 15 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

TfD nomination of Template:Football lineup

Template:Football lineup has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. – Pee Jay 21:01, 16 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Anand

I think you misinterpreted the comment (by me) in FIDE World Chess Championships 1998-2004. "only had to rely on a rapid playoff once" was a compliment to Anand - i.e. he only went to playoffs once, easily the least (and hence best) in any of those FIDE knockout world championships. It could be deleted on the grounds that it's an editorial comment, or moved to the new FIDE World Chess Championship 2000 article.

Great work on those new articles by the way. Once they're complete, we should delete the FIDE World Chess Championships 1998-2004 article. My only complaint is that the controversies on the tournaments should also be copied to the separate articles. Peter Ballard (talk) 09:46, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]