User talk:Conradjagan

Welcome!

Hello, Conradjagan, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help here on your talk page and a volunteer will visit you here shortly. Again, welcome! Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 09:50, 27 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Conradjagan, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Conradjagan! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Osarius (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:12, 27 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Shia

From where you have confirmed that Aamir Khan[1] is a Shia muslim? Bladesmulti (talk) 18:29, 30 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Santabanta link is not working and other two, a forum link and a twitter link are not reliable. Bladesmulti (talk) 02:31, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

March 2015

Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to Hindu nationalism, but we cannot accept original research. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, and ideas—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Please do not add unpublished sources as citations unless they are for supplementing published sources. Kautilya3 (talk) 17:00, 12 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

April 2015

Your addition to IGATE has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Material copied from http://profit.ndtv.com/news/corporates/article-igate-capgemini-deal-what-it-means-for-tcs-infosys-758764 GabrielF (talk) 01:36, 29 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Hindu. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. Kautilya3 (talk) 18:59, 6 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Self-published sources

With this edit you copied text from a blog.

"Anyone can create a personal web page or publish their own book, and also claim to be an expert in a certain field. For that reason self-published media—whether books, newsletters, personal websites, open wikis, blogs, personal pages on social networking sites, Internet forum postings, or tweets—are largely not acceptable. This includes any website whose content is largely user-generated." (WP:USERGENERATED) Please see WP:VERIFY. WP:RS and WP:CITE. Thank you JimRenge (talk) 08:03, 20 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kashmir conflict

Sorry, I clicked the wrong button while reverting your edit to Kashmir conflict. The reason for the revert is that the source doesn't support the statement about reasons for India's refusal to implement the UN resolution. Cheers, Kautilya3 (talk) 17:17, 7 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

June 2015

Hi there! Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks! 220 of ^Borg 09:03, 14 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A cup of coffee for you!

Thanks for adding the Times of India statement and link to the Hijra (South Asia) article. Blue Rasberry (talk) 13:02, 15 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

July 2015

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Ram Vilas Paswan may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

* {{Twitter|irvpaswan |Ram Vilas Paswan }

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 02:38, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Navjot Singh Sidhu may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

]'' and ''[[Rana Ranbir]]''. Sidhu has a made a cameo appearance in the Varun Dhawan starrer [[ABCD 2] with his all time comedy mate Kapil Sharma .

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 06:39, 12 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links

In accordance with WP:EL, please do not continue to add social networking sites (e.g. Twitter, Facebook and Instagram) to articles unless they are verified. In addition, per WP:ELOFFICIAL they should not be added at all if the subject has an official website.--Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 21:45, 21 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

July 2015

Please do not add or change content, as you did at List of Pakistani films of 2015, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you.--Jockzain (talk) 20:27, 24 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

References

Hi, when adding references, please make sure you use the |date= and |accessdate= parameters. Date is to ensure that the source is dated and accessdate helps in recovering archives if the original source goes down at some point. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 11:21, 28 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please update references when necessary

Hi there, in these edits you updated Calendar Girls' release date. You were sharp enough to add a new reference, which is appreciated, but you should have updated the reference in the infobox so that people curious why the date had changed would be pointed to the correct place. I have fixed this for you. Regards, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 00:43, 2 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

August 2015

Hi there! Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

This is the SECOND time you have been asked.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks! Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 11:53, 2 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Baahubali

Do not add fancrufty tables to articles which do not need any one of them like you did here. It has been removed. Please comply with MOS:TABLES which clearly states that tables "can be useful for a variety of content presentations on Wikipedia, but should be used only when appropriate; sometimes the information in a table may be better presented as prose paragraphs or as an embedded list". —Indian:BIO ^{[ ChitChat ]} 08:23, 4 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User:IndianBio, The table in Baahubali is according the pattern on other Indian films. Every column has been provided with third-party reliable source. And dont even think for a second that it is a fancrufty table. If you have any doubt , please discuss on article's talk page.--Conradjagan (talk) 06:13, 5 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

crore

From the text 24.39 crore households What is a crore and how can there be a partial household included? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 134.217.96.136 (talk) 20:23, 21 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

== September 2015 ==http://www.thewiire.com/box-office-collection/baahubali-box-office-collections-reach-570-cr-in-38-days-prabhas-rana-anushka/8410/ Welcome to Wikipedia. At least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to Baahubali: The Beginning, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at the welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Diff: [2] Surely you saw the obvious embedded note? {{Estimation}} Additionally, please note that box office values are estimates, so warring with other editors over yet another estimate as you have done here and here is not constructive. A higher number does not necessarily mean that the figures are more accurate. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 16:06, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 6

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Phantom (2015 film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hafiz Saeed. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:41, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disruptive editing - estimation template

Hi, please stop removing the {{Estimation}} template from articles as you did again here. This template is there for a reason. Additionally, please stop removing the embedded notes, as these too are in the article for a reason: to prevent disruptive editing. If you do this again, you will greatly inspire me to interrupt your editing privileges. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 10:04, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Conradjagan. You have new messages at Talk:Baahubali:_The_Beginning#Gross_dropped.3F.
Message added 10:05, 9 September 2015 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Cyphoidbomb (talk) 10:05, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Box Office India Isn't Reliable. STOP Making Changes Based On That

Box Office India website is a Hindi Movie site... Its not an official or reliable source for Indian movies.. You can't use it as a source.. And can't make changes using it as a source

Its clearly said here

It's unreliable source per

Wikipedia:WikiProject_Film/Indian_cinema_task_force#Guidelines on sources

And that too Baahubali is a Telugu movie.. So don't make any changes on Baahubali page using Box-office India website.. Thank u — Preceding unsigned comment added by Santhoshlee1 (talk • contribs) 12:43, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Gilgit-Baltistan Districts Ganchay.png listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Gilgit-Baltistan Districts Ganchay.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. User:Stefan2 (talk) 09:47, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Citations

Hi Conradjagan, Please take care to include full citations as required by WP:CITE. Author, publisher and the year of publication are always necessary. Without this information, we cannot verify that they are WP:RS, and we will assume that you haven't verified them either. - Kautilya3 (talk) 17:41, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ARBIPA notification

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

- Kautilya3 (talk) 07:44, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:10, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Signpost exit poll

Dear Wikipedian, you recently voted in the ArbCom election. Your username, along with around 155 other usernames of your fellow Wikipedians, was randomly selected from the 2000+ Wikipedians who voted this year, with the help of one of the election-commissioners. If you are willing, could you please participate (at your option either on-wiki via userspace or off-wiki via email) in an exit poll, and answer some questions about how you decided amongst the ArbCom candidates?

If you decide to participate in this exit poll, the statistical results will be published in the Signpost, an online newspaper with over 1000 Wikipedians among the readership. There are about twelve questions, which have alphanumerical answers; it should take you a few minutes to complete the exit poll questionnaire, and will help improve Wikipedia by giving future candidates information about what you think is important. This is only an unofficial survey, and will have no impact on your actual vote during this election, nor in any future election.

All questions are individually optional, and this entire exit poll itself is also entirely optional, though if you choose not to participate, I would appreciate a brief reply indicating why you decided not to take part (see Question Zero). Thanks for being a Wikipedian

The questionnaire

Dear Wikipedian, please fill out these questions -- at your option via usertalk or via email, see Detailed Instructions at the end of the twelve questions -- by putting the appropriate answer in the blanks provided. If you decide not to answer a question (all questions are optional), please put the reason down: "undecided" / "private information" / "prefer not to answer" / "question is not well-posed" / "other: please specify". Although the Signpost cannot guarantee that complex answers can be processed for publication, it will help us improve future exit polls, if you give us comments about why you could not answer specific questions.

quick and easy exit poll , estimated time required: 4 minutes

Q#0. Will you be responding to the questions in this exit poll? Why or why not?

Your Answer:
Your Comments:

Q#1. Arbs must have at least 0k / 2k / 4k / 8k / 16k / 32k+ edits to Wikipedia.

Your Numeric Answer:
Your Comments:

Q#2. Arbs must have at least 0 / 1 / 2 / 3 / 4 / 5 / 6 / 7+ years editing Wikipedia.

Your Numeric Answer:
Your Comments:

Q#3. Arbs...

^A: should not be an admin

^B: should preferably not be an admin

^C: can be but need not be an admin

^D: should preferably be an admin

^E: must be or have been an admin

^F: must currently be an admin

Your Single-Letter Answer:
Your Comments:

Q#4. Arbs must have at least 0 / 1 / 2 / 3 / 4 / 5 / 6 / 7+ years of experience as an admin.

Your Numeric Answer:
Your Comments:

Q#5. Completely optional, as all these questions are completely optional: which candidates did you support this year, and why?

Your List-Of-Usernames You Supported:
Your Comments:

The Quick&Easy End. Thank you for your answers. Please sign with your Wikipedia username here, especially important if you are emailing your answers, so we can avoid double-counting and similar confusion.

Your Wikipedia Username:
General Comments:

the extended exit poll, estimated time required: depends

Q#6. Completely optional, as all these questions are completely optional: which candidates did you oppose this year, and why?

Your List-Of-Usernames You Opposed:
Your Comments:

Q#7. Are there any Wikipedians you would like to see run for ArbCom, in the December 2016 election, twelve months from now? Who?

Your List-Of-Usernames As Potential Future Candidates:
Your Comments:

Q#8. Why did you vote in the 2015 ArbCom elections? In particular, how did you learn about the election, and what motivated you to participate this year?

Your Answer:
Your Comments:

Q#9. For potential arbs, good indicators of the right kind of contributions outside noticeboard activity, would be:

^A: discussions on the talkpages of articles which ARE subject to ArbCom sanctions

^B: discussions on the talkpages of articles NOT subject to ArbCom restrictions

^C: sending talkpage notifications e.g. with Twinkle, sticking to formal language

^D: sending talkpage notifications manually, and explaining with informal English

^E: working on policies/guidelines

^F: working on essays/helpdocs

^G: working on GA/FA/DYK/similar content

^H: working on copyedits/infoboxes/pictures/similar content

^I: working on categorization e.g. with HotCat

^J: working on autofixes e.g. with AWB or REFILL

^K: working with other Wikipedians via wikiprojects e.g. with MILHIST

^L: working with other Wikipedians via IRC e.g. with #wikipedia-en-help ^connect or informally

^M: working with other Wikipedians via email e.g. with UTRS or informally

^N: working with other Wikipedians in person e.g. at edit-a-thons / Wikipedian-in-residence / Wikimania / etc

^O: other types of contribution, please specify in your comments

Please specify a comma-separated list of the types of contributions you see as positive indicators for arb-candidates to have.

Your List-Of-Letters Answer:
Your Comments:

Q#10. Arbs who make many well-informed comments at these noticeboards (please specify which!) have the right kind of background, or experience, for ArbCom.

Options: ^A: AE, ^B: arbCases, ^C: LTA, ^D: OTRS, ^E: AN,

continued: ^F: OS/REVDEL, ^G: CU/SPI, ^H: AN/I, ^I: pageprot, ^J: NAC,

continued: ^K: RfC, ^L: RM, ^M: DRN, ^N: EA, ^O: 3o,

continued: ^P: NPOVN, ^Q: BLPN, ^R: RSN, ^S: NORN, ^T: FTN,

continued: ^U: teahouse, ^V: helpdesk, ^W: AfC, ^X: NPP, ^Y: AfD,

continued: ^1: UAA, ^2: COIN, ^3: antiSpam, ^4: AIV, ^5: 3RR,

continued: ^6: CCI, ^7: NFCC, ^8: abusefilter, ^9: BAG, ^0: VPT,

continued: ^Z: Other_noticeboard_not_listed_here_please_wikilink_your_answer

Please specify a comma-separated list of the noticeboards you see as important background-experience for arb-candidates to have.

Your List-Of-Letters Answer:
Your Comments:

Q#11. Arbs who make many comments at these noticeboards (please specify!) have the wrong kind of temperament, or personality, for ArbCom.

Options: (same as previous question -- please see above)

Please specify a comma-separated list of the noticeboards you see as worrisome personality-indicators for arb-candidates to have.

Your List-Of-Letters Answer:
Your Comments:

Q#12. Anything else we ought to know?

Your Custom-Designed Question(s):
Your Custom-Designed Answer(s):

The Extended-Answers End. Thank you for your answers. Please sign with your Wikipedia username here, especially important if you are emailing your answers, so we can avoid double-counting and similar confusion.

Your Wikipedia Username:
General Comments:

Detailed Instructions: you are welcome to answer these questions via usertalk (easiest), or via email (for a modicum of privacy).

how to submit your answers , estimated time required: 2 minutes

If you wish to answer via usertalk, go ahead and fill in the blanks by editing this subsection. Once you have completed the usertalk-based exit poll answers, click here to notify the Signpost copy-editor, leave a short usertalk note, and click save. The point of leaving the usertalk note, is to make sure your answers are processed and published.
If you wish to answer via email, create a new email to the Signpost column-editor by clicking Special:EmailUser/GamerPro64, and then paste the *plaintext* of the questions therein. Once you have completed the email-based exit poll answers, click here to notify the Signpost column-editor, leave a short usertalk note specifying the *time* you sent the email, and click save. The point of leaving the usertalk note, is to make sure your answers are processed and published (not stuck in the spam-folder).

Processing of responses will be performed in batches of ten, prior to publication in the Signpost. GamerPro64 will be processing the email-based answers, and will strive to maintain the privacy of your answers (as well as your email address and the associated IP address typically found in the email-headers), though of course as a volunteer effort, we cannot legally guarantee that GamerPro64 will have a system free from computer virii, we cannot legally guarantee that GamerPro64 will resist hypothetical bribes offered by the KGB/NSA/MI6 to reveal your secrets, and we cannot legally guarantee that GamerPro64 will make no mistakes. If you choose to answer on-wiki, your answers will be visible to other Wikipedians. If you choose to answer via email, your answers will be sent unencrypted over the internet, and we will do our best to protect your privacy, but unencrypted email is inherently an improper mechanism for doing so. Sorry! :-)

We do promise to try hard, not to make any mistakes, in the processing and presentation of your answers. If you have any questions or concerns, you may contact column-editor GamerPro64, copy-editor 75.108.94.227, or copy-editor Ryk72. Thanks for reading, and thanks for helping Wikipedia. GamerPro64 14:40, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Redirecting Shia Islam in India to Islam in India

Since you have contributed to Shia Islam in India, I am asking for your opinion at Talk:Shia Islam in India#Redirecting to Islam in India if article should be merged-redirected to Islam in India. Capitals00 (talk) 16:01, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Conradjagan. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]