Jump to content

User talk:Comte0/other years

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Archive: year0


WikiProject France

[edit]

Hello! We are a group of editors working to improve the quality of France related articles. You look like someone who might be interested in joining us in the France WikiProject and so I thought I'd drop you a line and invite you! We'd love to have you in our project :-) STTW (talk) 14:44, 14 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Not cruft?

[edit]

Most of the Koholint Island is a Cliff's Notes of a dungeon guide for Link's Awakening. A list of levels in a game is unnecessary and should not be done. - A Link to the Past (talk) 07:48, 19 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I guess we agree that your move was controversial by now. Next time, please follow the procedures outlined here if you still want to remove all of the information this article has. Comte0 15:29, 20 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
We? I'm removing conent that couldn't be on the article to add to my logic that it doesn't need an article. - A Link to the Past (talk) 19:31, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Apology

[edit]

Even though I feel that Koholint Island should be redirected, I shouldn't have opposed your reversion and should have opened discussion, so I apologize. - A Link to the Past (talk) 19:31, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Asano Naganori

[edit]

Hello. I posted a comment for you in Japanese wikipedia[1]. I'm glad if it could help you. Thanks. --Uiweo 10:32, 6 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Maryland Campaign is part of Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history

[edit]

I've just added the template to the talk page, I'd like you to complete it by adding an assessment. Actually, I'm writing this while editing the September 5, 1862 page; and I'd appreciate if you could check the other dates. Thank you, Comte0 11:51, 9 September 2007 (UTC)

Sorry, I usually do not participate in the frenzy of categorization and assessment activities these task forces generate. What dates are you asking me to check? Hal Jespersen 16:19, 9 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

wandering the darling scarp

[edit]

thanks for your cleanups - its great to see evidence of good work in those arts (chidlow, darlington, bellevue etc) - it is appreicated SatuSuro 13:17, 27 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Good work on the template categories :) Orderinchaos 23:22, 30 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sydney is new ACOTF

[edit]

Hi. You voted for Sydney as WP:ACOTF. It recently lost WP:GA status. It has been selected, so please help to improve it in any way you can. Thanks. --Scott Davis Talk 14:01, 14 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Independant state of australia, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Independant state of australia is a redirect to a non-existent page (CSD R1).

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Independant state of australia, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. CSDWarnBot 08:37, 16 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Australia newsletter

[edit]

WikiProject Australia publishes a newsletter informing Australian Wikipedians of ongoing events and happenings within the community and the project. This month's newsletter has been published. If you wish to unsubscribe from these messages, or prefer to have the newsletter delivered in full to your talk page, see our subscription page. This notice delivered by BrownBot (talk), at 21:30, 11 December 2007 (UTC).[reply]

WikiProject Australia newsletter

[edit]

WikiProject Australia publishes a newsletter informing Australian Wikipedians of ongoing events and happenings within the community and the project. This month's newsletter has been published. If you wish to unsubscribe from these messages, or prefer to have the newsletter delivered in full to your talk page, see our subscription page. This notice delivered by BrownBot (talk), at 21:29, 3 January 2008 (UTC).[reply]

hi

[edit]

Hi. I found you in categories of users who can contribute in English and Portuguese. I myself am a native speaker of English, but I'm well on my way to learning Portuguese. Just check out my user page and talk page, and join in any of the discussions. To keep updated, you can even put a watch on my user page, which will automatically watch my talk page. :-) learnportuguese (talk) 16:22, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

[edit]

Hello Comte0! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. Please note that all biographies of living persons must be sourced. If you were to add reliable, secondary sources to this article, it would greatly help us with the current 139 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

  1. Denise Fabre - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 18:49, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

David S. Miller

[edit]

Hi Comte, thank you for your input at the AfD on this article. One of the problems here is the entry in no way reflects the notability of this individual. I think one of the strongest points in his favor is (assuming the editor who made this claim is correct) his status as the #1 contributor in total edits to the kernel over the past five years. Well-sourced claims like this in the entry would certainly prevent the article from being deleted.

Regards, Fell Gleaming(talk) 01:54, 18 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Birthday

[edit]

Armbrust Talk Contribs 18:44, 5 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Olga Ivinskaya

[edit]

Hello! Your submission of Olga Ivinskaya at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! RlevseTalk 23:45, 27 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Olga Ivinskaya

[edit]

Orlady (talk) 06:02, 4 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Li Gang incident

[edit]

Hello! Your submission of Li Gang incident at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Intelligentsium 00:20, 8 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Li Gang incident

[edit]

The DYK project (nominate) 12:02, 18 November 2010 (UTC)

Your contributed article, Hannibal crossing the Alps

[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I notice that you recently created a new page, Hannibal crossing the Alps. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page - Hannibal. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will to continue helping improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Hannibal - you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think that the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Prestonmag (talk) 20:35, 27 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello ! I prefer write in french.

Marguerite Robert n'était pas une actrice comme tu le dis dans l'article. C'était une scénariste ! a moins que tu n'ai des renseignements sur sa carrière d'actrice. Bien à toi. 90.3.160.12 (talk) 15:34, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Non, j'ai lu trop vite sa nécrologie. Merci du signalement, j'ai corrigé l'article. Amicalement, Comte0 (talk) 15:46, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
C'est bien, mais pour la note 3, le lien HarperCollins reprend mot pour mot, l'article John Sanford (1904–2003) qui a quelques lacunes si l'on regarde en considération le site web consacré à Sanford. 90.3.160.12 (talk) 16:10, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Voici l'url et un autre sur Google Books où l'on apprend qu'elle a été blacklisté de 1951 à 1962. -90.3.160.12 (talk) 16:33, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Il y a un truc qui me chafouine. C'est cette recherche google Books. Apparemment, que sont ces quelques livres... Des scénario édités ou quoi d'autres, d'autre part l'article sur Wp:en laissait entendre qu'elle avait fini par suivre John Sanford et aurait adhéré au parti communiste américain ?! -90.3.160.12 (talk) 19:00, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
A propos du film de 1953 The Girl Who Had Everything, je ne trouve rien sur IMDb pourtant la source que tu indique pour la filmographie me semble plus que crédible. Il y a forcément un truc, mais quoi ? -90.3.160.12 (talk) 17:40, 7 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Ci-joint un lien pas trop mal sur John Sanford et Marguerite Roberts (On y apprend notamment qu'elle quitte le parti communiste en 1947 - la date d'adhésion se situe après celle de son second mari, peu après 1939). Bonne journée -90.3.160.12 (talk) 13:04, 8 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Euh..oui, j'ai bien eu ta réponse. mais le lien que j'ai indiqué d'abord permet de comprendre qu'elle entre au Parti pour suivre son mari, quitte le parti en 1947, contrairement à John qui ne revint jamais sur son adhésion (en plus on apprend que c'est elle, devenue une des scénaristes les mieux payées d'Hollywood, subvient aux besoins matériels du couple ...) Si tu as des liens concernant directement tout ça je suis preneur car big problem, les bots m'affichent une balise "adresse électronique". Voili, voilou 90.3.160.12 (talk) 14:58, 8 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Bonjour ! Je viens de créer mon compte. Tout ça pour dire que j'ai écrit fr:Marguerite Roberts et fr:John Sanford, ces deux ébauches sont à ta disposition. Ce n'est pas encore tellement developpé (je me suis aperçu que le catalogue de la librairie du Congrès était moins bien que le Sudoc et la Bnf, si tu as des liens de bibliothèque US je suis preneur). J'ai pour optique de sérieusement bosser mon anglais, il est vraiment encore à un niveau minimal. Je ne trouve pas de trace de Marguerite Roberts ici et pourtant tu l'as mis dans ta liste. Autre chose le site sur John Sanford est tenu par l'exécuteur testamentaire de John Sanford (vois son université et ses références dans l'article français), il a fait paraitre un bouquin sur Sanford. Voilà. Bonne journée -Mikeread (talk) 08:55, 13 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Barack Obama speech at Tucson memorial

[edit]

Cette vidéo est un excellent ajout. KimChee (talk) 08:32, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Suppression de la délégation

[edit]

Si tu parles de ceci, tu as autant d'infos que moi. Tu sais, il n'y a pas de coïncidence: Sarko crée la délégation et y met Asselineau, boum Asselineau devient UMP. Sarko quitte les Finances, Breton arrive, nettoie les machins des prédécesseurs, constate que cette délégation ne sert à rien (tu vois quelque chose que ces gens auraient fait sur les 2 ans?) et la liquide en mai 2006, du coup, re-boum Asselineau quitte l'UMP et fonde son parti. Glorieux parcours, hein! Sipahoc (talk) 15:24, 13 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Saint-Inglevert Airfield

[edit]

Many thanks for the copyedit and corrections. Mjroots (talk) 18:01, 22 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Re the owners, it is l'aeroclub du Boulonnais, L'aeroclub du Boulonnais or L'Aeroclub du Boulonnais? Currenty all three are in use. At the start of a sentence, it would be L'Aeroclub du Boulonnais, would it not? Please make any necessary corrections to the article?
Re the signal square deletion, I will raise this at WT:AVIATION as it seems to me to be a subject that should be covered. Mjroots (talk) 07:08, 23 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Ah, I see it's now at Signal square. Mjroots (talk) 07:10, 23 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on "signal square" requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Jehorn (talk) 19:47, 22 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Frank Searle (businessman)

[edit]

The DYK project (nominate) 16:03, 11 April 2011 (UTC)

CHOQ-FM

[edit]

Just to clarify, I've had to undo your recent move of CHOQ-FM to CHOQ.FM — the one with the hyphen is an FM radio station in Toronto, Ontario, while the one with the dot is a closed circuit station in Montreal, Quebec, and the web URL you listed in your edit summary is for the one in Montreal. The one in Montreal may or may not qualify for its own article depending on the availability of reliable sources about it, but it's completely separate from the one in Toronto (they're not even affiliated with each other). So it would involve starting a new article about the Montreal station, not moving the Toronto station to a different title. Thanks. Bearcat (talk) 05:41, 16 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour Comte0,
John A ou John B Sandford. Certes c'est un ébauche sur wp:fr et il y a encore des modifications à faire sur cet article ; cependant les sources sont correctes. Après recherches sur Google Books et Test Google, mais aussi après avoir épluché articles et sources littéraires, j'en suis arrivé à la conclusion "provisoire" , B. Aurais-tu des sources pour ce A (Si je me souviens bien il n'y a pratiquement que le Harpers et Collins qui donne ce A).Mike Coppolano (talk) 06:16, 22 April 2011 (UTC) ex Mikeread[reply]

Bonjour ! J'ai bien eu ton message. Merci. Finalement (je fais des versions pas encore des thèmes !), je m'aperçois de plus en plus que pas mal d'articles de wp:en sur la littérature sont des articulets (des fois copiés sans vergogne sur le site officiel de l'écrivain en question) pas très élaborés. Alors je vais directement aux sources en anglais -journaux, google books, universités- et cela donne des articles plus "charpentés". Pour l'article sur Sanford (en français), j'y reviendrais quand j'aurais plus parcouru ses bouquins dont beaucoup sont sur Google Books. Bien à toi. Mike Coppolano (talk) 07:35, 4 May 2011 (UTC) euh, je reviens, tu as oublié de mettre la catégorie communiste US, et personne blacklisté (Hollywood), je ne sais pas où trouver ces catégories ...[reply]

DYK for John Sanford (author)

[edit]

Another article contributed, thanks Victuallers (talk) 18:03, 13 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The article Aufklärungsgruppe has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Wikipedia is not a dictionary. See WP:DICTIONARY

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Inks.LWC (talk) 08:59, 15 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

[edit]

Thank you for doing the work I should have done....--Nuujinn (talk) 22:24, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour,
Si tu as le temps tu peux développer cet article. Ai écrit quelque chose de correct sur FrancEyE dans Wp:fr. Bon c'est pas tout des nouvelles du pays : je devrais aller à Braga l'année prochaine. Par contre si j'ai un bon accent en espagnol (mi abuelo era espanol !) j'ai des difficultés en portugais. Que me conseille tu ? Assimil ? Bien à toi. Mike Coppolano (talk) 04:39, 8 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Alhambra-Maurice Chevallier

[edit]

Hi Comte I am working on an English version of the theatre Alhambra-Maurice Chevallier. It is very difficult. You may not have seen my note here. But before spending much time on it, glance at the French version here and tell me your opinion:

  • Is it too long?
  • Is such historical detail useful in Wikipedia?

It is wonderful to have some help in French translation. But I suspect that there may be other articles that are more worthwhile than this one. However, if you think my translation so far is good, advise me how to proceed. Merci beaucoup. —Foobarnix (talk) 12:37, 9 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Paris/Orly to Paris/Charles de Gaulle

[edit]

Thank you for responding to my question at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject France/Paris. I took your advice and went with Orlyval to Antony and then with RER B to Charles de Gaulle terminal 2. My uncle gave me an unused ticket from Paris centre to Charles de Gaulle, I bought a ticket from Orly to Paris centre at Orly. Everything went smoothly. The Orlyval trip took about five minutes, the RER B trip took about an hour and five minutes. The tickets worked OK. At Charles de Gaulle I had to wait for 45 minutes to be checked in, then when I got through security check I had half an hour to spare before my flight back home to Finland left. Even though I tried to hurry when leaving Orly and arriving at Charles de Gaulle there was no real reason to hurry. I had planned in advance and not taken any cargo baggage, only hand baggage. In this case three hours and 25 minutes (my flight from Nice arrived at 12:00, my flight to Finland left at 15:25) is plenty of time to get from Orly to Charles de Gaulle. JIP | Talk 18:19, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome, I'm glad everything went well. Also, not carrying suitcases was a smart idea, it saves some time after landing at Orly and before takeoff at Roissy. Regards, Comte0 (talk) 13:55, 12 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Salut Comte0,
Tu devrais sur l'article qui lui est consacré mentionner le scénario de True Grit avec John Wayne. Vois fr:Marguerite Roberts. Je fais des articles courts mais j'épluche pas mal de docs. Ne me sens pas de rédiger longtemps. A part relire pour l'atelier de Lecture.
A part ça ça va, je vais à Braga, en mars ou avril, la saison est comment à cette époque là-bas ? Ce sera la première fois que je vais au Portugal, bien que j'ai une cousine par alliance né là-bas.
Hate logo ! ça commence à venir !Mike Coppolano (talk) 04:03, 12 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Merci Mike Coppolano (talk) 15:31, 17 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Email

[edit]

Je ne fais que moyennement confiance au système d'emailing.... je t'ai mis un message ce soir. Si tu ne l'as pas reçu, merci de me laisser un msg sur ma talk page :) Anthere (talk) 02:29, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. When you recently edited Human trafficking in France, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Britain, Minor and Romani (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:42, 13 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Zentralstelle für Kreditinformation (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Credit and GHI
Anna Larina (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Zek

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:21, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Douml

[edit]

No, there is still no page for tne project other than one on sourceforge and repo on github. When there are notable changes between it and Bouml we will probably create one Zeksirina (talk) 12:52, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of François Asselineau for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article François Asselineau is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/François Asselineau until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.--Lawren00 (talk) 16:53, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi !

[edit]

Tu pourrais me bricoler le truc en haut à droite de ma pdd. Merci. Bonne journée Mike Coppolano (talk) 10:25, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Euh ...

[edit]

I've fired the satus ! It didn't match ! Don't understand !
A plus ! Mike Coppolano (talk) 11:57, 8 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia_talk:Did_you_know#Tsilla_Chelton

[edit]

Wikipedia_talk:Did_you_know#Tsilla_Chelton is about an article you took to DYK. You may be interested in participating. --LauraHale (talk) 02:01, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comte0, were you planning to expand the article's prose sections? (For DYK, we don't count bytes, we count prose, which excludes lists and picture captions and the like.) I hope you were; she sounds like a fascinating lady. At the moment, the text has 1127 prose characters and needs to contain 1500. Please let us know. Thanks! BlueMoonset (talk) 14:24, 29 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Regrettably, there has been no action for over a week, and given the earlier delays, it looks like the article will not be qualifying for DYK. I'm sorry you weren't able to find additional material. BlueMoonset (talk) 03:40, 8 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

RfC:Infobox Road proposal

[edit]

WP:AURD (Australian Roads), is inviting comment on a proposal to convert Australian road articles to {{infobox road}}. Please come and discuss. The vote will be after concerns have been looked into.

You are being notified as a member on the list of WP:AUS

Nbound (talk) 05:56, 6 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipédia:Accueil principal listed at Redirects for discussion

[edit]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Wikipédia:Accueil principal. Since you had some involvement with the Wikipédia:Accueil principal redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. BDD (talk) 17:20, 1 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:52, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The Citation Barnstar The Citation Barnstar
Thanks, Comte0. You went above and beyond finding all of those references in French newspapers! —Anne Delong (talk) 21:58, 10 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Marc Lelandais, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page La Nouvelle Republique. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:42, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to Women in Food and Drink editathon

[edit]


November 2016

An opportunity for you and your country to contribute to the
Women in Food and Drink online editathon
Faciliated by Women in Red

--Ipigott (talk) 10:36, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

(To subscribe, Women in Red/Invite list. Unsubscribe, Women in Red/Opt-out list)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Sausage Software requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Light2021 (talk) 15:23, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

[edit]

Hello, Comte0. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page.

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

[edit]

Hello, Comte0. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited History of Portuguese wine, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Treaty of Windsor. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:31, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes reviewer granted

[edit]

Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:

Nakon 03:10, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Ferrat

[edit]

Thank you for seeing to it! :) Aridd (talk) 09:37, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, Comte0. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Could you add the cite?

[edit]

For " featured in the work of Eça de Queiroz" to Tavares (restaurant)? --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 02:47, 5 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited La Belle Dame sans Merci, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Phillip Roth (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:19, 25 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

January 2018

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm MrX. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Write Away, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. - MrX 21:37, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Affective Norms for English Words

[edit]

Hello Comte0,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Affective Norms for English Words for deletion, because it seems to be copied from another source, probably infringing copyright.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to rewrite it in your own words, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:52, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comments at Talk:Sciences Po

[edit]

Hi, Comte0, and thanks for your response at Talk:Sciences Po. Good point about what they did at fr-wiki, I wasn't aware of that! Due to an error on my part, your comment is in the wrong place. Would you mind very much moving, or re-posting your comment into the #Survey section lower down? My apologies: I hadn't gotten around yet to creating a "Survey" section header before you replied, and your response is looking a little forlorn at the end of the "References" section, where it might get missed. I didn't want to move your comments myself per WP:TPO restrictions, but you are certainly free to move your own comment (or to restate it as a vote). If you do decide to move it, I think it would be okay to just do that since it's your own words, but if you want to adhere strictly to the requirements of WP:TPO, then the way to do that is to strike your previous comments, perhaps adding an explanatory post-script such as, "See survey section below" or "Moved to Survey", and then just add whatever you want to the Survey. Sorry for the hassle, and thanks again, Mathglot (talk) 08:31, 29 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, Comte0. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, Comte0. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Please try to write more than just minimal articles like this, that just say she won an award but use the information in the references to show the importance. . The O'Reilly articles shows her as responsible for the development of a major product at one company, and the Forbes, for being senior director of engineering at a fairly important firm. I almost listed it for deletion, for the award is relatively minor. I'm still not sure sh'e notable, but there's at least a reasonable chance. If you don't have time to do more than this at first, it's safer to do it in Draft space. DGG ( talk ) 07:22, 1 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Tamar Bercovici moved to draftspace

[edit]

An article you recently created, Tamar Bercovici, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Sam Sailor 09:59, 1 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Anne Aaron moved to draftspace

[edit]

An article you recently created, Anne Aaron, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Sam Sailor 13:34, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Meow 2019

[edit]
Bonne année Comte0, mon parrain sur enwiki, tous mes vœux pour 2019 ! Amicalement, — Bédévore [knock knock] 23:47, 2 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Mon bouton signature a disparu

[edit]

Bonjour Comte0, désolée de t'embêter avec un bidule aussi trivial, mais le chouette bouton pour signer n'apparaît plus en haut à gauche de la fenêtre d'edit. J'ai dû bidouiller un truc sans faire exprès... saurais-tu comment y remédier, s'il te plaît ? Bien cordialement, -Bédévore (talk) 22:52, 23 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Tamar Bercovici

[edit]

Hello, Comte0. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Tamar Bercovici".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Snowycats (talk) 17:17, 2 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Woohooo

[edit]
Hey, Comte0. I'd like to wish you a wonderful First Edit Day on behalf of the Wikipedia Birthday Committee!
Have a great day!
Mjs1991 (talk) 10:01, 26 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
It's been 17 years already. Next year I'll be able to drink Comte0 (talk) 13:16, 26 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

September 2019 Backlog Banzai

[edit]
Military history service award
For scoring 25 points in the WikiProject Military history September 2019 edit-a-thon Backlog Banzai I hereby award this stripe for your efforts. Thank you for your contributions. CPA-5 (talk) 10:21, 2 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:03, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Google Code-In 2019 is coming - please mentor some documentation tasks!

[edit]

Hello,

Google Code-In, Google-organized contest in which the Wikimedia Foundation participates, starts in a few weeks. This contest is about taking high school students into the world of opensource. I'm sending you this message because you recently edited a documentation page at the English Wikipedia.

I would like to ask you to take part in Google Code-In as a mentor. That would mean to prepare at least one task (it can be documentation related, or something else - the other categories are Code, Design, Quality Assurance and Outreach) for the participants, and help the student to complete it. Please sign up at the contest page and send us your Google account address to google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org, so we can invite you in!

From my own experience, Google Code-In can be fun, you can make several new friends, attract new people to your wiki and make them part of your community.

If you have any questions, please let us know at google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org.

Thank you!

--User:Martin Urbanec (talk) 21:58, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Closed-circuit radio for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Closed-circuit radio is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Closed-circuit radio until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Stickymatch 15:00, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Happy First Edit Day, Comte0, from the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Have a great day! PRAHLADbalaji (M•T•AC) This message was left at 00:44, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Happy First Edit Day!

[edit]

A cup of coffee for you!

[edit]
For answering a question about how to get DOS services under Windows 10. Robert McClenon (talk) 16:12, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Birthday!

[edit]
Notice

The article Perianne Boring has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

notability not established, not sufficient reliable coverage for this beauty queen turned lobbyist. The Washington Times is local news, only covering her because she ran in DC. WUSA9 is also local news. The WUSA9 article contains no original research, basing primarily on an interview with her, it is not substantial coverage.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ysangkok (talk) 18:02, 23 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:13, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]