User talk:ComputerHotline
Welcome
[edit]Welcome
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your recent contributions seem to be advertising or for promotional purposes. Wikipedia does not allow advertising in articles. For more information on this, see
- Policy on neutral point of view
- Guideline on spam
- Guideline on external links
- Guideline on conflict of interest
If you still have questions, there is a new contributor's help page, or you can write {{helpme}} below this message along with a question and someone will be along to answer it shortly. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia.
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing Wikipedia! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! Ckatzchatspy 21:03, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
POTD scheduling
[edit]Hi and thanks for your efforts in scheduling the Picture of the day. However, the image you selected, File:Thomas Bresson - Machaon-1 (by).jpg is not a Featured Picture. The Pictures of the day are selected from the existing Featured pictures in a roughly FIFO order. If you are interested in nominating this image for Featured status, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. If you would like to help out with the POTD, please be sure to read Wikipedia:Picture of the day/Guidelines. Thank you and let me know if you have any questions. howcheng {chat} 18:52, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
- It's a Featured Picture on Wikimedia Commons. It's indicated.--ComputerHotline (talk) 20:03, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
- Yes, but it's not a FP here. Commons and en-WP FPs are different. howcheng {chat} 03:50, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
- It's a Featured Picture on Wikimedia Commons. It's indicated.--ComputerHotline (talk) 20:03, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
FPC
[edit]Hey ComputerHotline, Welcome to wikipedia and specifically Wikipedia:FPC. I saw your images there and would like to inform you that for pictres to be featured, they should have encylopedic value and contribute to atleast one article at the time of nomination. Please correct this and then feel free to nominate the image. Regards, Muhammad(talk) 18:07, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
An image created by you has been promoted to featured picture status Your image, File:Thomas Bresson - Machaon-1 (by) edit.jpg, was nominated on Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate an image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Thank you for your contribution! Muhammad(talk) 07:10, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
|
POTD notification
[edit]Hi there,
Just to let you know that the Featured Picture File:Thomas Bresson - Machaon-1 (by) edit.jpg is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on November 7, 2009. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2009-11-07. howcheng {chat} 05:05, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
Thanks/Merci
[edit]For finding my misspellings and errors of terminology, and thanks for the excellent photographs! Acroterion (talk) 19:18, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
An image created by you has been promoted to featured picture status Your image, File:Morpho peleides 2.jpg, was nominated on Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate an image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Thank you for your contribution! King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:33, 12 September 2012 (UTC)
|
You'll need to explain why it's not the same thing, not just say it, otherwise someone else is likely to do the same thing. -- Patchy1 09:14, 18 December 2012 (UTC)
- Because close-up photography is where the reproduction ratio is from 1:10 to 1:1. More of "macro" photographs are really close-up photographs. --ComputerHotline (talk) 10:55, 18 December 2012 (UTC)
- Repeating the content of the article doesn't help me to understand the difference. In any case, the difference doesn't appear to be significant, so I would suggest adding a new section to Close-up about the differences you are referring to, because as it stands the titles of the two articles are ambiguous and you need to provide enough context so that someone unfamiliar with the subject can understand what your talking about. At the end of the day your article will be redirected to the existing article. -- Patchy1 11:07, 18 December 2012 (UTC)
Merge discussion for Stroboscopic effect
[edit]An article that you have been involved in editing, Stroboscopic effect, has been proposed for a merge with another article. If you are interested in the merge discussion, please participate by going here, and adding your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. 128.211.168.1 (talk) 00:05, 7 August 2014 (UTC)
November 2014
[edit]Hello, I'm I dream of horses. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Fort du Salbert— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. I dream of horses If you reply here, please leave me a {{Talkback}} message on my talk page. @ 08:27, 12 November 2014 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:50, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]Hello, ComputerHotline. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]Hello, ComputerHotline. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, ComputerHotline. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, ComputerHotline. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)