User talk:Combatuser1

September 2023

Hello, I'm HistoryofIran. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Ardashir I seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. HistoryofIran (talk) 17:02, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

according to tabari recources they were kurd Combatuser1 (talk) 17:05, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

See WP:PST, WP:CITE, WP:EXCEPTIONAL and WP:UNDUE. The Sasanians are unanimously regarded as Persian, and Kurds were not an ethnicity back then [1]. --HistoryofIran (talk) 17:15, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Im sorry but you have no knowledge, Kurds existed even before Persians and Kurds are the founder of iranic union Combatuser1 (talk) 17:21, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This is quite ironic, considering WP:RS contradicts you (do also refrain from making personal attacks, WP:NPA). In Wikipedia we follow WP:RS, not the personal opinion of other users. If you continue this you will be reported. --HistoryofIran (talk) 17:33, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

its not personal opinion, I have tabari sources that they were Kurdish, if you continue in publishing false informations you will be reported. Combatuser1 (talk) 17:40, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Based on your response, you clearly did not read what I posted up above. Sure, report me - WP:OUCH. --HistoryofIran (talk) 17:50, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

What relation do you have to do this account? Is this yours? [2] --HistoryofIran (talk) 19:13, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Ardashir I. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. - LouisAragon (talk) 17:13, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Kebab, you may be blocked from editing. —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 17:34, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

its not unsourced or poorly sourced its literally pure sources Combatuser1 (talk) 14:36, 19 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Korek Airlines. —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 16:30, 19 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Ad Orientem (talk) 16:59, 19 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have extended your block to one week from today because of your attempt to evade it using User:CombatA11. If you create any further accounts to evade the block, I will indefinitely block this account and any more sock puppet accounts will be blocked on sight. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 17:57, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Combatuser1. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. firefly ( t · c ) 21:37, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]