User talk:Coimenda

Welcome!

Hello, Coimenda, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page Pickle Rick did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to The Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Introduction tutorial
Contributing to Wikipedia
How to edit a page
Introduction to referencing
Help pages
Simplified Manual of Style
Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need personal help ask me on my talk page, or ask a question on your talk page. Again, welcome. Suonii180 (talk) 15:57, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Scoob! into Scooby-Doo in film. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 00:33, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 7

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Rick and Morty characters, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Love potion. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Stop claiming Space Beth is a main character

2 major roles, 2 minor roles that might as well be cameos, and 2 absences in 6 episodes in season 6 so far, is not a main character in any universe. Neither is her single appearance in the season 4 finale. Just because she's not an alternate universe version doesn't mean she should be treated as somehow more special than Evil Morty or Rick Prime. Yes I know Space Beth has more appearances than those two, but those two are also significantly more impactful to the overall story. Stop with this please, or I will have to report you for constantly adding WP:FANCRUFT and WP:OR. 09:03, 20 October 2022 (UTC) Unnamed anon (talk) 09:03, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I heard that you started the franchise page for The Loud House. As for your work for the renaming of the character page, that should be discussed first before it can be officially named. One editor who was last reported to have been blocked once tried to do a merger with the character list associated with The Casagrandes only for it to later be undone by another editor. I just wanted to let you know that before you do attempt #2. If you want to make any other characters in the show have their own pages, you need to find the right sources to help warrant their own pages like how one person did with the page for Howard and Harold McBride. I just wanted to let you know that. --Rtkat3 (talk) 04:10, 15 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Rtkat3: What I am proposing is a page similar to List of characters in the Breaking Bad franchise, which used to be List of Breaking Bad and Better Call Saul characters before the franchise expanded to include a sequel film, El Camino, and animated series, Slippin' Jimmy. So information on the versions off the characters from The Really Loud House would be added to the page, along with the concluded The Casagrandes, with overview cast tables being drawn up for the main and recurring characters. Coimenda (talk) 10:42, 16 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You will have to start a proposal like that on the talk page....especially if you want to win over the decision of @Magitroopa: and the other editors that work on that page. I have once stated that George Lopez' character Ernesto Estrella had made four speaking appearances in the shared universe only for Magitroopa to revert it. If any more characters from The Casagrandes are to pop up in The Loud House, what you are proposing might be the direction we might have to go down. Right? --Rtkat3 (talk) 19:07, 16 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

November 2022

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at The Ghost and Molly McGee, you may be blocked from editing. Please stop. BrickMaster02 (talk) 15:10, 28 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia. Knock it off. BrickMaster02 (talk) 15:18, 28 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@BrickMaster02: Why are you reverting my The Ghost and Molly McGee edits and calling them vandalism? I was about to expand the character page, and make articles for the first episode and the one with the Second World War reference, given there is more than enough sources on the internet to justify them. Coimenda (talk) 15:20, 28 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You don't expand or make pages for those that REALLY don't need them. You do not know the criteria for creating pages for characters or episodes. BrickMaster02 (talk) 15:21, 28 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@BrickMaster02: So why are you reporting me as a vandal? I had no idea what you were referring to; I thought you for some reason thought the bolding to the character text or vanchors I included was vandalism, when I was putting them there ahead of redirecting to the characters. Coimenda (talk) 15:24, 28 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Because I warned you twice and didn't listen. Your contributions, in my opinion, made things worse than before. BrickMaster02 (talk) 15:24, 28 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@BrickMaster02: No, you warned me once, then tried to put a second warning above just now when I was in the middle of responding to you to ask you why you had just tagged my episode redirected for deletion. I made no other article adits past then other than responding to you, because you are confusing me. Could you explain why you think that, instead of surprising me with big red text? Coimenda (talk) 15:27, 28 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No, you undid my final warning and replaced it with your response. After my initial warning, you continued creating unnecessary articles. BrickMaster02 (talk) 15:29, 28 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@BrickMaster02: I did not undo that on purpose; you put that there while I was typing my reply, so when I clicked publish, it deleted it. I only noticed it had been added after then, because you added it while we were talking. And they were not articles (yet), they were redirects. Coimenda (talk) 15:34, 28 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note - I've reviewed the edits at the article and I see nothing that represents disruptive editing or vandalism. -- Whpq (talk) 15:42, 28 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Whpq.

@BrickMaster02: Can we consider this settled? Coimenda (talk) 15:44, 28 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not until those pages are deleted and you promise to stop the pointless editing. BrickMaster02 (talk) 15:49, 28 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@BrickMaster02: My edits have been identified as not having been either disruptive editing. Explain yourself. Coimenda (talk) 15:51, 28 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I think they were. They were 100% not warranted. BrickMaster02 (talk) 15:52, 28 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@BrickMaster02: And Whpq has indicated that you were wrong, that nothing (their words, not mine) about my edits represented either disruptive editing or vandalism. Meaning I should be free to create the rest of the redirects without being harassed by you. Can I be assured of that at least? Coimenda (talk) 15:53, 28 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No. Whether or not you get "harassment", those redirects are NOT important, UNLESS a page for an episode was created but reverted due to lack of information, or a change in page name. BrickMaster02 (talk) 15:56, 28 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Start a discussion about these redirects at Talk:The Ghost and Molly McGee, and invite any interested Wikiprojects and editors to provide their input. Discuss and come to a consensus. -- Whpq (talk) 16:03, 28 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A disagreement over whether redirects are warranted is not disruptive editing. What discussion have you had with Coimenda and other editors about the need for these redirects? What consensus has been reached about these redirects? As far as I can tell, none of this has happened. -- Whpq (talk) 15:59, 28 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You know what? I'm done wasting time on this. You do you, I won't stop you. Whenever I try to make any contribution, helpful or not, I always get shit on. Even when I actually try to do something helpful, I always get flack. So, you create your redirects, and I'll question if life is worth it… BrickMaster02 (talk) 16:06, 28 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Coimenda (talk) 16:08, 28 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@BrickMaster02: Take a breath — editing Wikipedia has a way of getting under our skin from time to time. There's always more topics to contribute to, and interesting projects to get involved in. Me, I'm still trying to get my head around wikidata... — TheresNoTime (talk • they/them) 16:11, 28 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:56, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

December 2022

I'm sorry to interrupt you again after what happened days ago, but I'm afraid you cannot move page templates for Disney Channel or add mentions to a supposed "Cinematic Universe". You don't see any Nickelodeon article have a template for their superheroes. I think there was literally nothing wrong with them, and I think some of those edits will be undone by admin. BrickMaster02 (talk) 14:13, 1 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@BrickMaster02: It is fine: it is is not a "cinematic universe" really: just a collection of superhero shows set in the same world created by Chris Peterson & Bryan Moore. Lab Rats and Mighty Med were followed by the joint sequel series Lab Rats: Elite Force, then a few years later, The Villains of Valley View was produced by Peterson & Moore again, with characters and institutions from Lab Rats and Mighty Med being mentioned. I can rename the template if you prefer. Coimenda (talk) 14:57, 1 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I still don't think it is necessary. Again, you don't see Nickelodeon have a template for their superheroes. Besides, I think both shows don't have anything in common, staff wise. And the mention of Villains could lead to someone thinking it's a spin-off, when it isn't. Also, the mentions of it in the articles gives me the implication of a "Cinematic Universe", so I recommend removing that sentence in those. BrickMaster02 (talk) 15:01, 1 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

December 2022

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Amaury • 16:49, 1 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia. Amaury • 16:50, 1 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Amaury: Why are you reverting my edits on the Category:Lab Rats and Category:Mighty Med pages? There are enough pages to warrant a category and template. Coimenda (talk) 16:52, 1 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No, there aren't. You are making a huge number of changes en masse without discussion and creating a huge mess in the process, including creating a bunch of pointless redirects. That is disruptive, so knock it off. You can discuss these changes on each article's talk page, but there likely won't be any support for them. Amaury • 17:06, 1 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I will do that. Coimenda (talk) 17:09, 1 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Mighty Med

A tag has been placed on Category:Mighty Med indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:09, 2 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Proinsias Cassidy.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Proinsias Cassidy.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 20:30, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The Loud House-related 2

Why is the word "the" listed twice in List of characters in The Loud House franchise title? I think you might've made a mistake there with the titling. If so, you might want to get that fixed. I'm just making a suggestion here. --Rtkat3 (talk) 03:07, 8 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Never mind, I took care of that error. Not to show you some disrespect, but I advise that you be careful in page title errors from now on. --Rtkat3 (talk) 03:25, 8 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Rtkat3: That was intentional: "List of characters in the The Loud House franchise" was correct. Because it is the The Loud House franchise that the page is about, just like it is the Breaking Bad franchise. It just happens that the name of this franchise has "the" as its first word. The new phrasing you have given is like if List of characters in the Breaking Bad franchise was moved to List of characters in Breaking Bad franchise; the title was already right. Coimenda (talk) 13:25, 8 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The List of characters in the Breaking Bad franchise page is justified, but there shouldn't be an extra "the" in front of any show that begins with that word. If you don't believe me, look up another character page that doesn't have the format you wanted to do where it's show starts with the word "the". I'm just making a suggestion here. Rtkat3 (talk) 15:44, 8 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Ponyo^{bons mots} 17:40, 9 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]