User talk:Cody Fairless-Lee

Awesome edits to Getaway (2013)

Just wanted to congratulate you on the AWESOME edits to Getaway (film) =) Nice to see huge Selena Gomez fans on Wikipedia. That plot is SO accurate; it must've taken AGEEES!!!!!! Keep up the GREAT work =) =) !!!!!!! 129.180.160.213 (talk) 05:22, 11 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Spider-Man in film

STOP removing The Amazing Spider-Man (1977 film) from the film list and STOP adding the unreleased sequel to The Amazing Spider-Man (2012 film) to the list. If you do not stop this disruptive editing you will be blocked. Spidey104 19:18, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

November 2012

Hello, I'm SummerPhD. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Rotten Tomatoes, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. SummerPhD (talk) 03:42, 25 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Frankenweenie (2012 film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Musical (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:22, 20 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 27

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Robot Chicken (season 5), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Escort and Sara Lee (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:59, 27 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

January 2013

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Johnny Depp. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. If the release date has changed, there should be a reliable source you can add as a reference. Rivertorch (talk) 19:32, 30 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Bar Rescue

Undid your edit in the criticism section because I felt like it was all hearsay. I read the blog mentioned and the comments where "employees" from previous episodes chimed in, and it's all completely unverifiable. The writer of the blog even gets into a flame war in the comments, further lowering their credibility. I would love to see a section on the authenticity of the show however, one random blogger claiming he talked to the owners and things said in internet comments, don't belong on Wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tousk003 (talk • contribs) 20:06, 24 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

June 2013

Hello, I'm Areaseven. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Ted (film), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Areaseven (talk) 22:58, 20 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did to Ted (film), without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Areaseven (talk) 00:39, 22 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Carrie (2013 film)

Hi. If you're going to write plot synopses of movies, do you think you could address these issues? Nightscream (talk) 03:26, 18 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

October 2013

Hello, I'm SummerPhD. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Enchanted (film), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. SummerPhD (talk) 01:41, 23 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A belated welcome!

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Cineplex. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page, consult Wikipedia:Questions, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there.

Again, welcome! Darylgolden^(talk) 05:06, 6 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 22

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Noah (film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page 3-D (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:50, 22 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Bar Rescue

added a link pointing to Emotional distress

Ice Bucket Challenge

added a link pointing to Spit

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:14, 15 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Unsourced content

Hi, I reverted your contribution here because you added information to an article about a movie that hasn't yet been released, but you did not include a source. Future events must be sourced per WP:CRYSTAL. Thanks, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 18:56, 10 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 14

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of Walt Disney Pictures films, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Variety. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 14 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

November 2015

Hello, I'm Tymon.r. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to 2016 in home video— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Tymon.r Do you have any questions? 19:14, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I reverted your edits, because you removed huge amount of content without even giving any reason. It had to be reverted. Please consult such changes on discuission pages or give some good reason in edit summary. Tymon.r Do you have any questions? 19:42, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:56, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

700-word limit on film plots

Please mind the WP:FILMPLOT 700-word limit on plot section length. You can use an online tool such as this one to check on the length. Binksternet (talk) 04:38, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You are still violating WP:FILMPLOT with too-large additions such as this one. Please stop. Binksternet (talk) 07:59, 13 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

December 2015

Your recent editing history at Template:Marvel Comics films shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. TriiipleThreat (talk) 22:31, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

March 2016

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make disruptive edits to Wikipedia contrary to the Manual of Style, as you did at Krampus (film). Stop ignoring the 700-word limit described at WP:FILMPLOT. This is not your creative writing forum. Binksternet (talk) 22:08, 26 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

List of films considered the worst

I reverted you but my edit summary was inaccurate. I left an explanation on the talk page. Keep in mind that entries must be succinct on that article, much like the WP:FILMPLOT problem you seem to be having on other articles.LM2000 (talk) 05:34, 13 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

List of box office bombs edit reversion

You did not explain why you removed what you did, so I undid your removal on List of box office bombs. Please use the edit summary to help editors in the future avoid problems similar to this. HarryKernow (talk to me) 01:45, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

November 2016

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Pixels (2015 film), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 03:06, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to List of Paramount Pictures films. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 06:56, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Cineplex. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Jumanji

I'm the one who you replied to regarding the Jumanji franchise. I'm on a different IP Address, but I assure you I'm the same person.

It doesn't matter what "universe" each story takes place in, nor does it matter what the director of the Zathura movie thinks of Jumanji. Jumanji started out as a book, not a movie. The book had a sequel called "Zathura". Both books were adapted into different movies with separate continuities, but they are both based on the franchise that began with the books. The franchise began with the book, and since Zathura is the sequel to Jumanji, it is part of the same franchise. The Jumanji and Zathura movies may be disconnected from each other, but they're still part of the same franchise. Christopher Nolan's Dark Knight trilogy isn't canon to Tim Burton's 1989 Batman movie, but they're still part of the same "Batman" franchise. The same is applied to Jumanji: Different movies based on the same franchise. 2602:306:B814:A430:7CB7:F914:67DD:B3CA (talk) 07:14, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I've taken it to the franchise talk page if you want to discuss how a sequel isn't part of the same franchise as the thing it's a sequel to. 198.209.164.83 (talk) 17:59, 4 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

September 2017

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to List of Columbia Pictures films. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Citations are not decorative elements you add to your edits to make them look more plausible. If you continue adding citations that fail verification, I will block you. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 19:37, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

October 2017

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at List of Columbia Pictures films. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 02:59, 9 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I thought the upcoming sequel to Spider-Man: Homecoming is part of the stupid Marvel Cinematic Universe like the first movie? - Cineplex (talk) 09:47PM - November 3, 2017

November 2017

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at The Women of Marwen. Stop adding unsourced production companies. You've been repeatedly warned about this. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 20:15, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry! What unsourced material did I add to The Women of Maren? - Cineplex (talk) 10:24PM - November 2, 2017

This diff shows that you added an unsourced production company. I have repeatedly asked you to stop adding unsourced production companies. Per this consensus, production companies should be cited to a reliable source. This is to prevent people from guessing at what companies are involved based on primary sources, such as trailers, posters, and other promotional material. WikiProject Film maintains an information page at WP:FILM/R that may help in locating sources. Trade magazines, such as Variety and The Hollywood Reporter, are frequently the best place to find this information. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 06:51, 3 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Well, thanks for the heads up! But, look @ it this way: I did delete the whole DreamWorks thing from this and other articles as there's no reliable source for that? - Cineplex (talk) 09:46PM - November 3, 2017

December 2017

This is your only warning; if you remove or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia again, as you did at List of Columbia Pictures films, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 18:18, 2 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You've been warned repeatedly for your disruptive editing. No more warnings after this. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 18:20, 2 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Are you nuts? Last I checked, All the Money in the World is a TriStar movie, not a Columbia movie! Where does it say Columbia? I removed the movie from that article because it's true! - Cineplex (talk) 10:04PM - December 2, 2017
  - See WP:VNT. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 06:35, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Cineplex. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

March 2018

Hello, I'm SummerPhDv2.0. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Men in Black (film series), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. SummerPhD^v2.0 22:15, 6 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Winter's Tale (film). This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 10:15, 25 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

April 2018

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Around the World in 80 Days (2004 film), you may be blocked from editing. Evil Idiot (talk) 1:28, 17 April 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 14

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Breaking In (2018 film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Billy Burke (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:18, 14 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 23

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Overboard (2018 film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Hannah (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:32, 23 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Plots and Plagiarism

Hi. The plot summaries you added to Breaking In (2018 film) and Overboard (2018 film) are identical to those at IMDB, which suggests plagiarism. Please be mindful that direct copying from another website is unacceptable. I have reverted the Overboard edit (a movie I haven't yet seen) and rewritten the description of Breaking In. I did not check for other plot summaries that you may have added, I only came upon these two. Also, the summaries posted are overlong; plot descriptions on Wikipedia should run 400-700 words. Consider condensing and rewriting into your own words instead of merely copying others' work. Refer to MOS:PLOT and WP:PLOTSUM for guidance. It is also possible that the IMDB summaries are your work, but there is no indication of such, and unmarked summaries at IMDB are usually the work of their staff or come from studio information, in my experience. Thank you, have a pleasant time editing! – Salamurai (talk) 21:40, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I've removed your overlong plot summary from The House with a Clock in Its Walls (film) because it goes against guidelines at WP:FILMPLOT, and more importantly, policy at WP:PLOT that requires a concise summary. Your summary was over 1,700 words when a summary needs to be a maximum of 700. Please do not restore. Erik (talk | contrib) ^{(ping me)} 12:31, 26 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

October 2018

Hello, I'm Betty Logan. Your recent edit to the page List of highest-grossing films appears to have added incorrect information, so it has been removed for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Betty Logan (talk) 05:01, 30 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I thought by the time Shrek 2 ended it's run in 2004, it was the third highest-grossing film of all-time. - Cineplex (talk) 10:45PM - October 30, 2018

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Cineplex. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Cineplex. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Read sources before you change anything

. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.192.64.61 (talk) 17:57, 8 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:15, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

April 2020

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Trolls World Tour. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. – wallyfromdilbert (talk) 19:34, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I did have reliable sources for the film’s supposed IMAX release as it was shown in the newer theatrical posters and featurettes, yet you have denied them. The second time adding that sentence into the article, I didn’t put the sources back in and that’s good enough for you either. Stop ignoring the truth! - Cineplex - 7:25PM - April 13, 2020 Cineplex (talk) 23:25, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Drawing your own conclusions about content from ads or Twitter posts is original research. Content should be based on reporting in reliable secondary sources, especially for contentious information. There is already a talk page discussion about the film's theatrical release, and you should continue the discussion there, rather than repeated reinserted information without proper sourcing. – wallyfromdilbert (talk) 23:37, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your username

Welcome to Wikipedia. I saw that you edited or created Cineplex Entertainment, and I noticed that your username, "Cineplex", may not comply with our username policy. Please note that you may not use a username that represents the name of a company, group, organization, product, service, or website. Examples of usernames that are not allowed include "XYZ Company", "MyWidgetsUSA.com", and "Foobar Museum of Art". However, you are permitted to use a username that contains such a name if it identifies you individually, such as "Sara Smith at XYZ Company", "Mark at WidgetsUSA", or "FoobarFan87".

Please also note that Wikipedia does not allow accounts to be shared by multiple people, and that you may not advocate for or promote any company, group, organization, product, service, or website, regardless of your username. Please also read our paid editing policy and our conflict of interest guideline. If you are a single individual and are willing to contribute to Wikipedia in an unbiased manner, please request a change of username, by completing the form at Special:GlobalRenameRequest, choosing a username that complies with our username policy. If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. Thank you. MarioGom (talk) 11:34, 26 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Secret Window, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Horror (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:31, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

June 2020

There have been two problems with this account: the account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia, and your username indicates that the account represents a business or other organisation or group or a web site, which is also against policy, as an account must be for just one person. Because of those problems, the account has been blocked indefinitely from editing. Additionally, if you receive, or expect to receive, compensation for your contributions to Wikipedia, you must disclose who is paying you to edit.

If you intend to make useful contributions other than promoting your business or organisation, you may request an unblock. To do so, post the text {{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with a new username you are willing to use. See Special:CentralAuth to search for available usernames. Your new username will need to meet our username policy. Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In that reason, you must:

Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

If you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal this block. To do so, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page, replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason for thinking that the block was an error, and publish the page. Orange Mike | Talk 19:18, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Cody Fairless-Lee (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

Cody Fairless-Lee (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

I now know the mistake I had made by having a name from a cinema chain as my username. I apologize and I request that my username be changed to my full name.

Accept reason:

You've been unblocked by Orangemike. MER-C 15:52, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Do you have a connection with the cinema chain? 331dot (talk) 09:36, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No, I do not! - Cineplex (talk) - 7:33PM - June 25, 2020

Account renamed from Cineplex. 331dot (talk) 10:38, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Why am I still blocked from editing by Orangemike? ~ Orangemike (talk) ~ I already changed by username. Wasn't that the problem? - Cineplex (talk) - 8:50PM - June 27, 2020

The unblock appeals queue is heavily backlogged at the moment. I view this appeal favourably and am leaning towards unblocking, but @Orangemike: for comments from the blocking admin before I do so. MER-C 10:02, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:31, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

April 2023

Hi Cody Fairless-Lee! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of Renfield (film) several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree at Talk:Renfield (film), please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you. Belbury (talk) 07:47, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:41, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Dune- Part Two poster - March 1, 2024.jpeg

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on File:Dune- Part Two poster - March 1, 2024.jpeg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://www.impawards.com/2024/dune_part_two.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. KylieTastic (talk) 19:08, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:The SpongeBob Movie- Sponge on the Run - Canadian theatrical release poster.png

Thanks for uploading File:The SpongeBob Movie- Sponge on the Run - Canadian theatrical release poster.png. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 18:30, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:The SpongeBob Movie- Sponge on the Run - Canadian theatrical release poster.png

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:The SpongeBob Movie- Sponge on the Run - Canadian theatrical release poster.png. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status and its source. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously.

If you did not create this work entirely yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. You will also need to state under what licensing terms it was released. Please refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file.

Please add this information by editing the image description page. If the necessary information is not added within the next seven days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. TheGreatestLuvofAll (talk) 15:21, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]