User talk:Clukowiak

Welcome

Hello Clukowiak and welcome to Wikipedia! We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your contributions do not conform to our policies. For more information on this, see Wikipedia's policies on vandalism and limits on acceptable additions. If you'd like to experiment with the wiki's syntax, please do so in the sandbox (but beware that the contents of the sandbox are deleted frequently) rather than in articles.

If you still have questions, there is a new contributors' help page, or you can click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia.

I hope you enjoy editing and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! S0091 (talk) 09:34, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Clukowiak, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Clukowiak! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Naypta (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:08, 18 January 2020 (UTC)

February 2020

Hello, I'm GorillaWarfare. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on Caroline Flack, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source, so I removed it. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! GorillaWarfare (talk) 18:29, 15 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Caroline Flack. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. L1amw90 (talk) 18:53, 15 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Alexanderlee. I noticed that you recently made an edit to Caroline Flack in which your edit summary did not appear to describe the change you made. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Alex (talk) 18:53, 15 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Adding to the above: Burkhard Driest. You added a lot of information, but in the process we not only lost all references already there, but also your version (from where??? ... terrible translation, machine translation???) had no sources. Please don't do that. It causes others more work. You are new, and need to understand a few more things about formatting and referencing before changing anything in articles. People who recently died are especially well observed and should not show flaws as no references. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 11:01, 29 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

March 2020

Hello, I'm I dream of horses. I noticed that in this edit to Wolfgang Hofmann, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. I dream of horses ^{(talk) (contribs)} _{Remember to {{ping}} me after replying off my talk page} 04:37, 13 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The added content was copied word for word from an obituary. Removing it - after having added it - was a good idea. I rephrased it. Please, in the future, never copy anything from external references. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:38, 13 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I said the same thing above. Burkhard Driest is on the Main page today, DYK? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:39, 13 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

April 2020

Hello, I'm SounderBruce. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Rick May, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Sounder Bruce 06:41, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Ted Bundy, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Please do not introduce extra unsourced detail into info box when it is already mentioned in main text. Thank you. David J Johnson (talk) 10:32, 17 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit of yours to the page Billie Eilish has an edit summary that appears to be inaccurate or inappropriate. The summaries are helpful to people browsing an article's history, so it is important that you use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did. Feel free to use the sandbox to make test edits. Thank you. Elizium23 (talk) 21:56, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia. EvergreenFir (talk) 21:59, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Materialscientist (talk) 22:39, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Larry Hockett. I wanted to let you know that one or more external links you added to Jeffrey Dahmer have been removed because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links. Thank you. Larry Hockett (Talk) 11:47, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

May 2020

Please do not add or change content without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. QueerFilmNerd^talk 04:07, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Libby Tanner, you may be blocked from editing. You have also added unreferenced information to the following additional articles: Kate Atkinson (actress), Harrison Ford, Daisy Ridley, Maisie Williams plus many more biographical articles about living people. Please stop. Shearonink (talk) 04:49, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Rodney Dangerfield, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Deer Park (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:01, 19 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Materialscientist (talk) 13:27, 19 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

June 2020

Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Bridget Westfall, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 03:17, 6 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or significantly change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did with this edit to Kaz Proctor. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Materialscientist (talk) 05:53, 6 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit of yours has an edit summary that appears to be inaccurate or inappropriate. The summaries are helpful to people browsing an article's history, so it is important that you use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did. Feel free to use the sandbox to make test edits. Thank you. Elizium23 (talk) 06:17, 6 June 2020 (UTC) Note to other editors this editor has never used an accurate edit summary and has never edited a talk page, therefore may not speak English. Elizium23 (talk) 06:18, 6 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to List of Sense8 characters, you may be blocked from editing. TheEpTic (talk) 07:09, 6 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ANI notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 13:15, 7 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

June 2020

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 17:48, 7 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You can be unblocked if you agree to start sourcing the content that you add to Wikipedia. Although copy-pasting content from Wikia is likely allowed by its license, it would have to attributed, and citations to reliable sources would have to be included. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 17:55, 7 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]