User talk:Clayton.Barth

Speedy deletion nomination of Fugly Toby Maguire

Hello Clayton.Barth,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Fugly Toby Maguire for deletion, because it seems to be vandalism or a hoax.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. --Richard Yin (talk) 18:39, 18 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Dane Bachman

Hello Clayton.Barth,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Dane Bachman for deletion, because it seems to be vandalism or a hoax.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. --Richard Yin (talk) 18:40, 18 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Dillon the hacker

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Dillon the hacker requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. --Richard Yin (talk) 18:41, 18 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

November 2014

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Laws of thermodynamics has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Laws of thermodynamics was changed by Clayton.Barth (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.965865 on 2014-11-18T18:44:09+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 18:44, 18 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Snuggums (talk / edits) 18:45, 18 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Batman, you may be blocked from editing without further notice.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Batman was changed by Clayton.Barth (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.980406 on 2014-11-18T18:46:54+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 18:47, 18 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Favonian (talk) 18:51, 18 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Clayton.Barth (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I meant no harm and my edits were not inappropriate or hurtful. I was only poking fun.

Decline reason:

Nothing but vandalism from this account. --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 04:50, 20 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.