User talk:Claudinian

Welcome

Hello, Claudinian, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} and your question on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

We hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on talk and vote pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Active Banana (^bananaphone 14:12, 30 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

February 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a neutral point of view. A contribution you made to Claudine Barretto appears to carry a non-neutral point of view, and your edit may have been changed or reverted to correct the problem. Please remember to observe this important core policy. Thank you. Evil saltine (talk) 16:10, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

March 2010

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Claudine Barretto. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Evil saltine (talk) 05:14, 1 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss the disputed large-scale changes to Claudine Barretto on the talk page of that article before making them. If you persist with these changes without discussing them, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia for disruptive editing. Evil saltine (talk) 02:47, 2 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is the final warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you delete or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did to Talk:Claudine Barretto, you will be blocked from editing. You have repeatedly removed other users' posts from this page. JamesBWatson (talk) 11:41, 3 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked for a period of 24 hours for disruptive editing, specficially unwarranted page blanking and inserting unsourced and biased edits into articles. To contest this block, please reply here on your talk page by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} along with the reason you believe the block is unjustified, or email the blocking administrator. For alternative methods to appeal, see Wikipedia:Appealing a block. Daniel Case (talk) 17:25, 3 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 17:35, 19 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Wiki pseud (talk) 01:38, 20 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Claudine Barretto's Filmography

In "Film and Television Career" it is stated that the first film of Claudine Barretto from Seiko Film are Kumusta Ka, Aking Mahal?, Taong Gubat, Pulis Patola and Kung Sakali Man but these movies are not indicated in Claudine Barretto's Filmography that's why I included the movies in her filmography.

Barreto's first three films under Seiko were Kumusta Ka, Aking Mahal?, Taong Gubat and Pulis Patola. She was paired with newcomer Emil Benedicto. She also did Kung Sakali Man. Although an exclusive Seiko contract star before, she was still allowed to accept two assignments with Star Cinema, Home Along Da Riles (The Movie) and May Minamahal.

Thnks..

--Claudinian (talk) 17:59, 19 March 2010 (UTC)Claudinian[reply]

Claudine Barretto's title: "Optimum Star"

Based on the Philippine Television, Claudine Barretto is hailed as the Optimum Star, how come it is not indicated in her article?

--Claudinian (talk) 18:00, 19 March 2010 (UTC)Claudinian[reply]

She was never hailed as such. And no distinction whatsoever has been laid out indicating that she is a so called Optimum Star. This is just a fan-based titular provision and not acclaimed by any media of any sort (unlike titles such as Superstar, Star of All Seasons, Diamond Star, Megastar, Young Superstar). Repeated changes made will merit you automatic and permanent ban. Wiki pseud (talk) 01:10, 20 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Claudine's Anthology 2010

The next TV production of Claudine barretto is "Claudine: Alzhiemer episode" that's why I included it to her article.

Thanks

--Claudinian (talk) 18:02, 19 March 2010 (UTC)Claudinian[reply]

Again until you place a reference or citation indicating the confirm title of such, this will remain as is. Please provide appropriate article citing the title and relevant details. But until then, do not revert or alter anything. This article is not a fan article, this is encyclopedic. You are writing on a fan's POV which is loosely based on opinions and idolatry. We need to set a neutral tone on this article, and what you are doing does not clearly help at all. Wiki pseud (talk) 01:13, 20 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Claudine Barretto's Twitter Account

How come the twitter account of claudine indicated in her article is not wotking (www.twitter.com/claudinbarretto)? The real twitter account of Claudine Barretto is www.twitter.com/dineybarretto not claudinbarretto.

--Claudinian (talk) 18:03, 19 March 2010 (UTC)Claudnian[reply]

This has been corrected in the infobox. Wiki pseud (talk) 01:14, 20 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a neutral point of view. A contribution you made to Claudine Barretto appears to carry a non-neutral point of view, and your edit may have been changed or reverted to correct the problem. Please remember to observe this important core policy. Thank you. --Diannaa ^TALK 06:19, 20 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Claudine Barretto. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Wiki pseud (talk) 06:38, 20 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss the disputed large-scale changes to Claudine Barretto on the talk page of that article before making them. If you persist with these changes without discussing them, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia for disruptive editing. Wiki pseud (talk) 06:38, 20 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unencyclopedic content to Wikipedia, as you did to the Claudine Barretto article. Wikipedia is not a fan site, nor is it a site where actors and actresses can promote themselves and their work. Please keep your contributions neutral in tone and factual. Thank you --Diannaa ^TALK 21:36, 24 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Excessive bolding

Please note that our manual of style indicates that bolding is rarely appropriate for use in articles. Active Banana (^bananaphone 14:12, 30 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:Babaeng Hampaslupa.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Babaeng Hampaslupa.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 05:05, 26 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:Sa dulo.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Sa dulo.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 07:05, 26 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:Sasasas.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Sasasas.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 07:06, 26 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Marinaclau.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Marinaclau.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, we also need to know the terms of the license that the copyright holder has published the file under, usually done by adding a licensing tag. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged files may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the file will be deleted 48 hours after 07:14, 26 March 2011 (UTC). If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Fut.Perf. ☼ 07:14, 26 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Iisa pa lamang.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Iisa pa lamang.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, we also need to know the terms of the license that the copyright holder has published the file under, usually done by adding a licensing tag. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged files may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the file will be deleted 48 hours after 07:15, 26 March 2011 (UTC). If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Fut.Perf. ☼ 07:15, 26 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

March 2011

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to upload media files lacking copyright information, you may be blocked from editing. If you are unsure of the correct copyright template, please refer to the list of image copyright tags or ask at the copyright question page. Fut.Perf. ☼ 07:17, 26 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Ikaw ang lahat.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Ikaw ang lahat.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, we also need to know the terms of the license that the copyright holder has published the file under, usually done by adding a licensing tag. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged files may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the file will be deleted 48 hours after 07:19, 26 March 2011 (UTC). If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Fut.Perf. ☼ 07:19, 26 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Saan kaman.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Saan kaman.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, we also need to know the terms of the license that the copyright holder has published the file under, usually done by adding a licensing tag. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged files may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the file will be deleted 48 hours after 07:19, 26 March 2011 (UTC). If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Fut.Perf. ☼ 07:19, 26 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

Since you have ignored all the warnings above, you have been blocked from editing for a short while. You can be unblocked as soon as you indicate you have understood our WP:image use policy and promise to abide by it. Fut.Perf. ☼ 07:33, 26 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Claudine barretto 2.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Claudine barretto 2.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, we also need to know the terms of the license that the copyright holder has published the file under, usually done by adding a licensing tag. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged files may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the file will be deleted 48 hours after 01:34, 31 March 2011 (UTC). If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 01:34, 31 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

April 2011

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for violating copyright policy by copying text or images into Wikipedia from another source without verifying permission. You have been previously warned that this is against policy, but have persisted, as you did at File:Claudine barretto 2.jpg. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Fut.Perf. ☼ 22:22, 4 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Claudinian/Claudine Barretto

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on User:Claudinian/Claudine Barretto, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.
It appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free Web hosting service. (See section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion.)

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. —Compassionate727 ^(T·C) 04:43, 1 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]