User talk:ClaudeSB

Welcome, Claude! :)

Hello, ClaudeSB, and welcome to Wikipedia! We're so glad you're here. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
How to edit a page
Help pages
How to write a great article
Manual of Style
Also feel free to make test edits in my sandbox.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please leave me a message. Srose (talk) 16:08, 11 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not a chemical or nuclear science person. Environmental science and biology are more up my alley. However, I can at least watch any articles you create and edit and copyedit them or let you know if you're sourcing them properly and if they follow all guidelines, if that's any help. Srose (talk) 21:51, 11 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Test comment from message link

This is a test

ClaudeSB 16:02, 13 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fusion Design reference

Claude thanks for the extensive reference. I had previously read a final summary of the results of JET, but this will hopefully broaden my knowledge. Best regards, Albester 15:42, 16 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your VandalProof Application

Dear ClaudeSB,

Thank you for applying for VandalProof! (VP). As you may know, VP is a very powerful program, and in fact the just released 1.3 version has even more power. Because of this we must uphold strict protocols before approving a new applicant. Regretfully, I have chosen to decline your application at this time. The reason for this is that Your edit count is too low. Please note it is nothing personal by any means, and we certainly welcome you to apply again soon. Thank you for your interest in VandalProof. Betacommand ^{(talk • contribs • Bot)} 21:06, 19 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Mayors

Not sure, but I'd prefer them to be redlinks so that articles on them can be created. -- Earl Andrew - talk 20:01, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I would reccomend perhaps creating articles on these mayors instead of putting links to them. Links usually go at the bottom of pages they specify. The only instance that I've seen on Wikipedia for external links replacing red links is for local elections where candidates aren't notable for articles. I would say that mayors deffinately are notable however. -- Earl Andrew - talk 20:41, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I'm not sure how famous the playright is, but if he is far and above more famous than the others, then the dab page will go at Michel Tremblay (disambiguation). I don't know if you'd like to do this, or if you're asking me to do so. -- Earl Andrew - talk 22:42, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Energy portal & future selected articles

Hi! Over the past couple of months I've been spending much more time than I should developing the Energy portal, and intend asking for a portal peer review within the next day or so.

The portal provides a showcase for energy-related articles on Wikipedia. One of the most prominent ways is via a the selected article that is currently changed every 6 weeks or so. It would be good to increase this turnover, and with three Wikiprojects dedicated to energy-related topics and a good number of articles already written, I'd like to suggest that members of each Wikiproject might like to use the 'selected article' to feature some of their best work.

With this in mind, I'd like to suggest that your Wikiproject bypasses the normal selected article nomination page and decides collectively which articles are worth featuring - or these may be self-evident from previous discussions - and add short 'introduction' to the selected article at the appropriate place on page Portal:Energy/Selected article/Drafts, which includes further information. Your personal involvement would be welcome!

Please make any comments on your Wikiproject talk page, my talk page, or on Portal talk:Energy/Selected article/Drafts, as appropriate. Gralo 15:29, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please help improve Plug-in hybrid

You are listed as a participant in WikiProject Energy development, so I am asking you to please consider helping to improve the plug-in hybrid article. This is an ad hoc article improvement drive. BenB4 08:08, 17 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You maybe interested in the Article Rescue Squadron

I notice that you are part of Category:Inclusionist_Wikipedians. I would like you to consider joining the Article Rescue Squadron. Rescue Squadron members are focused on rescuing articles for deletion, that might otherwise be lost forever. I think you will find our project matches your vision of Wikipedia.

Ikip (talk) 00:53, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A study on how to cover scientific uncertainties/controversies

Hi. I have emailed you to ask whether you would agree to participate in a short survey on how to cover scientific uncertainties/controversies in articles pertaining to global warming and climate change (survey described here). If interested, please email me Encyclopaedia21 (talk) 14:37, 5 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Michel Tremblay (Varennes politician) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Michel Tremblay (Varennes politician) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michel Tremblay (Varennes politician) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Bearcat (talk) 05:29, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Claude Boucher.jpg

The file File:Claude Boucher.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused personal photo. Out of scope. Uploaded for XXX. No other use.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 08:07, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]