User talk:Classyklowngrasper

UnSettled: Inside The Strange World of Asbestos Lawsuits (documentary)

Proposed deletion of UnSettled: Inside The Strange World of Asbestos Lawsuits (documentary)

Hello, Classyklowngrasper. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, UnSettled: Inside The Strange World of Asbestos Lawsuits (documentary), for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

edit the page
remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 11:53, 3 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of UnSettled: Inside The Strange World of Asbestos Lawsuits for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article UnSettled: Inside The Strange World of Asbestos Lawsuits is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/UnSettled: Inside The Strange World of Asbestos Lawsuits until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 11:48, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

This account has been blocked indefinitely from editing for sock puppetry per evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Classyklowngrasper. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Bbb23 (talk) 17:06, 27 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:GarlockSealingTechLogo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:GarlockSealingTechLogo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:28, 14 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Shein Law Center for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Shein Law Center is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shein Law Center until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

RPI2026F1 (talk) 17:17, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]