User talk:Clandon Park Historian

Clandon Park Historian, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Clandon Park Historian! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Cordless Larry (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

22:03, 5 May 2017 (UTC)

July 2017

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Clandon Park, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Theroadislong (talk) 19:05, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Clandon Park. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing Wikipedia. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. Theroadislong (talk) 07:57, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

August 2017

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Clandon Park. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Theroadislong (talk) 21:51, 2 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Clandon Park

Editors are trying to help you on the talk page, and it will take time for the Park vs House debate to be settled. If you continue adding website URLs into the first paragraph of the article and changing the lead section so that it reads like a promotion for Rupert Onslow and his commercial activities, you're going to end up blocked from Wikipedia due to an obvious conflict of interest. It's an encyclopedia, not a way of promoting individuals or businesses. Firebrace (talk) 22:34, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

June 2019

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did on Clandon Park House. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Theroadislong (talk) 15:32, 22 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]