User talk:Cieran 91

Whilst you are at libery to do what you will with your own talk page, you are not impressing anyone with language like that. StephenBuxton (talk) 12:30, 23 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

November 2007

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Red Barn Murder, you will be blocked from editing. ~Matticus ^U_C 12:30, 23 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Brown, you will be blocked from editing. ~Matticus ^U_C 12:32, 23 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Following your vandalism to Mega- (amongst others), you have now been reported. StephenBuxton (talk) 12:42, 23 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did to Wikipedia:Verifiability, you will be blocked from editing. Excirial^{(Talk,Contribs)} 12:47, 23 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. Hut 8.5 12:50, 23 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

What?

Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reason(s):

Based on your past contributions I'm lifting the block as a sign of good faith. I will keep an eye out for vandalism. Please don't forget to log out when you edit from school.

Request handled by: KnowledgeOfSelf | talk 18:48, 23 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I originally undid the tag you added to that image - I basically went through every edit made by "you" today, and undid those that had not been undone already. At the time, I must admit it seemed like a strange edit for a vandal to do. If what you say is true, then it stands to reason that your genuine edit should remain in place. StephenBuxton (talk) 14:49, 23 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thanks so much for that, I really do appreciate it ^_^...

Orphaned non-free image File:TheLemonPress.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:TheLemonPress.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 23:26, 29 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]