Jump to content

User talk:CiderDog06

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

[edit]

Hello, CiderDog06, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Ian and I work with Wiki Education; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.

I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing.

Handouts
Additional Resources
  • You can find answers to many student questions in our FAQ.

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Ian (Wiki Ed) (talk) 16:28, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Choosing an article

[edit]

I looked over User:CiderDog06/Choose an Article. Since the evaluation here is going to involve raising the article by one quality class according to Wikipedia's content assessment scale, my advice is to pick something that is as poorly developed as possible. My sense is that Emma (2009 TV serial) is too developed (it's C-class already, which despite the name is really not that bad). The other two you selected Judaism Unbound and Treeing Walker Coonhound are both better, especially the former. That said, both are pretty clearly Start-class and my advice would be to start with a true stub. That said, if you wanted to go Judaism Unbound, I think that there is definitely room to grow and some low hanging fruit, it'll probably just be a bit more work than working with another article that is a true stub. Up to you and I'm happy to talk more. —mako 22:58, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

squeak! Okay, I will try to find a true stub related to my favorite topics (Judaism, Hounds, Jane Austen, HealthPoint? Idk if my employer is on here). CiderDog06 (talk) 01:12, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Peer Review

[edit]

Hello! I wrote a peer review for your Columbia Park (Seattle) article. Feel free to go check it out. Overall, great additions! Betty Cohn (talk) 22:20, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I just wanted to drop you a line here to let you know that your additions to the article are truly great! Thanks for going (well!) above and beyond on the research. Beyond the class assignment, this is a great contribution to the public good and to (South) Seattle. Brava! —mako 01:21, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]