User talk:ChumSmitoom

Watch Stalker by Andrei Tarkovsky

Why you should do that.

It's good.

September 2020

Hello, I'm Vizzinifezzikwomanchuck. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been disallowed by an edit filter because they did not appear constructive. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page, which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Also feel free to ask for assistance at the Help Desk whenever you like to. Thank you. Vizzinifezzikwomanchuck (talk) 20:20, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:ChumSmitoom

A tag has been placed on User:ChumSmitoom requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. VViking_TalkEdits 13:32, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Contested deletion

This page should not be speedily deleted because I'm just setting up my account before I start editing. I would just like you to not delete my userpage. It took a while to make. --ChumSmitoom (talk) 13:53, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ChumSmitoom, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi ChumSmitoom! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like GreenMeansGo (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 18 September 2020 (UTC)

June 2021

Hello. Some of your recent genre changes, such as the one you made to Arabian Knights (song), have conflicted with our neutral point of view and/or verifiability policies. While we invite all users to contribute constructively to Wikipedia, we urge all editors to provide reliable sources for edits made. When others disagree, we recommend you seek consensus for certain edits by discussing the matter on the article's talk page. Thank you. Rob van vee 17:36, 13 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, you can change those back, I would like to ask why someone would call time by tom waits "experimental rock" though, it is undeniably a folk song ChumSmitoom (talk) 07:32, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Genre warring at Marquee Moon

Your recent editing history at Marquee Moon shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Peter (talk) 03:49, 29 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

May 2022

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to List of progressive rock artists, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 21:24, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah that was a mistake on my part, tried to revert it but couldn't find out how to do it on my phone, thanks for reverting it for me haha ChumSmitoom (talk) 21:27, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Lola Versus Powerman and the Moneygoround, Part One, you may be blocked from editing. - Arjayay (talk) 21:25, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wait how was that vandalism? ChumSmitoom (talk) 21:29, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

September 2022

Hello. Some of your recent genre changes have conflicted with our neutral point of view and/or verifiability policies. While we invite all users to contribute constructively to Wikipedia, we urge all editors to provide reliable sources for edits made. When others disagree, we recommend you seek consensus for certain edits by discussing the matter on the article's talk page. Thank you. Blueberry72 (talk) 08:12, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]