User talk:Chuang726

August 2019

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:Dial-A-Poem Montreal, from its old location at User:Chuang726/sandbox. This has been done because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. -Liance^{talk/contribs} 22:02, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Chuang726, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! -Liance^{talk/contribs} 22:02, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Katharine Beeman

The article Katharine Beeman has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Doesn't meet WP:GNG or WP:POET

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. CalOtter (talk) 23:16, 16 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Clifford Duffy

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Clifford Duffy requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. The Mirror Cracked (talk) 23:38, 16 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Anne Cimon

The article Anne Cimon has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence to suggest that the subject is notable, specifically the article does not meet the criteria specified in either WP:GNG or WP:POET

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. The Mirror Cracked (talk) 23:40, 16 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Alan Bourassa

The article Alan Bourassa has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence to suggest that the subject is notable, specifically the article does not meet the criteria specified in either WP:GNG or WP:PROF

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. The Mirror Cracked (talk) 23:42, 16 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dial-A-Poem Montreal has been accepted

Dial-A-Poem Montreal, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Bkissin (talk) 21:39, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A cupcake for you!

Thanks for creating the new Dial-A-Poem Montreal page, and for your work to improve Wikipedia. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 21:53, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi Chuang726! You created a thread called First article - getting approved at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread.

Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 9 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ian Ferrier for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ian Ferrier is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ian Ferrier until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Andrew Base (talk) 16:45, 14 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Joan Ruvinsky moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Joan Ruvinsky, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Lopifalko (talk) 17:25, 21 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Peter O’Brien moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Peter O’Brien, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Lopifalko (talk) 17:27, 21 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

nominating Ken Norris for DYK?

Hi Chuang726, and thanks for starting the article on Ken Norris (Canadian poet). I was wondering, have you ever nominated an article via the Did you know... process? I think this article would be a good candidate. Let me know what you think, and if you'd like any assistance. = paul2520 (talk) 22:36, 21 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

SpicyMilkBoy, thanks for your work on the article. Would you be interested to nominate the article for DYK, or help with the nomination if I did it? = paul2520 (talk) 04:21, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Paul2520, I'm going to be busy over the next few days and won't have much time to help with the nomination. Sorry! SpicyMilkBoy (talk) 13:18, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Not a problem, SpicyMilkBoy! I can do it. = paul2520 (talk) 13:37, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi SpicyMilkBoy Paul2520 That sounds great, I'd be happy to help! = chuang726 (talk) 16:53, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Chuang726 and SpicyMilkBoy: Ah, sorry I dropped the ball on this. I was saving it to the Thanksgiving break, but realize now that you expanded the article November 21 (eight days ago), but the DYK requirements say it must be nominated within seven days. Sorry! Let's try for another one in the future. = paul2520 (talk) 23:36, 29 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of John Sobol for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article John Sobol is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Sobol until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Bearcat (talk) 02:05, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident with which you may be involved. Thank you. Graywalls (talk) 18:39, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Katharine Beeman for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Katharine Beeman is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Katharine Beeman until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. scope_creep^Talk 19:06, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ken Norris (Canadian poet)

The article Ken Norris (Canadian poet) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article does not indicate notability for the person and Google check doesn't show signs of notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Graywalls (talk) 00:37, 24 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Some advice

Hi there, and thank you for all your articles on Canadian poetry. Many of your articles are being nominated for deletion, so I thought I would give you some advice on how to prevent this in the future.

To avoid deletion, articles have to meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines and be backed up by reliable sources. The rule of thumb is that an article should have at least three citations to reliable publications that provide in-depth coverage and are independent of the subject. An example would be several paragraphs about the subject in a reputable newspaper, book, journal or magazine. Some resources that I find helpful for finding sources are Google Books, Google News and Google Scholar, the Internet Archive, and Newspapers.com. Also note that it's okay to use sources that are offline or in other languages.

Sources like university alumni profiles, CVs, and publications by organizations the person is a part of do not contribute to notability because they are not independent of the subject; neither do blogs or miscellaneous websites, because they are self-published. Interviews are not considered to be independent sources either. If you are unsure whether an article is notable or not, consider asking for help at the Teahouse or submitting a draft through Articles for Creation.

Finally, I noticed that many of the articles you've written are related to Dial-A-Poem Montreal. Do you have a personal connection with this project, or with any other subject you've written about? If so, that's fine, but there are some guidelines that have to be followed: see Wikipedia:Plain and simple conflict of interest guide. Basically, you will have to state your connection to the subject on your user page, and all articles related to the subject have to be submitted through Articles for Creation. If not, then that doesn't apply, but I'm curious what sparked your interest in the subject. :) SpicyMilkBoy (talk) 17:37, 24 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi SpicyMilkBoy Thank you for the advice, very helpful! A lot of these poets were notable in an underground scene so it has been difficult to find sources for them. Yes I am helping with writing wikipedia entries on Canadian poets in 80s Montreal for a Library and Archives grant. I will add that to my user page (once I figure out how!) = chuang726 (talk) 16:53, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Good to know, thanks! You may want to look at WP:GLAM, which is our project page for partnerships between Wikipedia and museums, galleries, libraries & archives. SpicyMilkBoy (talk) 17:03, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Laurence Hutchman for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Laurence Hutchman is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Laurence Hutchman until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Graywalls (talk) 10:57, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Chuang726

Thank you for creating Claudia Lapp.

User:Cwmhiraeth, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Please learn to format your references better, see this page

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Cwmhiraeth}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 07:34, 28 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Marcia Goldberg for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Marcia Goldberg is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marcia Goldberg until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Bearcat (talk) 03:09, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Joan Ruvinsky concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Joan Ruvinsky, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:33, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Peter O’Brien concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Peter O’Brien, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:38, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Peter O’Brien

Hello, Chuang726. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Peter O’Brien".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Lapablo (talk) 18:04, 22 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Joan Ruvinsky

Hello, Chuang726. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Joan Ruvinsky".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! TheImaCow (talk) 10:06, 23 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]