Jump to content

User talk:Christophe Neff

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from User talk:Christophe.Neff)

hi

[edit]

Hi. I found you in the category of users who can contribute in English and Portuguese. I myself am a native speaker of English, but I'm well on my way to learning Portuguese. Just check out my user page and talk page, and join in any of the discussions. To keep updated, you can even put a watch on my user page, which will automatically watch my talk page. :-) learnportuguese (talk) 16:15, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Misha Defonseca

[edit]

"Hallo - i have added some biographical informations about Misha Defonseca. I d' ont agree with your idea to merge the bookstory with the person (or to create a redirect). yours Christophe.Neff (talk) 16:38, 1 March 2008 (UTC)"[reply]

Then I think you should give an actual reason why we shouldn't do such a merge on Talk:Misha Defonseca. I've already given a reason why we should: she is not notable for anything else except this book, and the book, though it is not a truthful account of Defonseca's life, is entirely entangled with that life. -- 65.78.13.238 (talk) 16:45, 1 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, feel free to add those points back in (I agree that they're interesting) and I'll clean them up if need be. As for merging, I don't think that's much of a threat now that the article has been polished up some; it does need more biography and less scandal, though, but we can only work with what we have. :) Take care, María (habla conmigo) 17:53, 1 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If the English version is okay, then I see no reason to fix what isn't broken. María (habla conmigo) 13:05, 4 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Éditions Robert Laffont

[edit]

I have nominated Éditions Robert Laffont, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Éditions Robert Laffont. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Otolemur crassicaudatus (talk) 21:02, 1 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have withdrawn nomination. Otolemur crassicaudatus (talk) 21:49, 1 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I do not know portugese well, because my mother tongue in English. And yes you are true, I am nocturnal, probably biurnal. Have a look at Napoleon I of France, he had no fixed sleeping time. Otolemur crassicaudatus (talk) 21:59, 1 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Germany Invitation

[edit]

Hello, Christophe Neff! I'd like to call your attention to the WikiProject Germany and the German-speaking Wikipedians' notice board. I hope their links, sub-projects and discussions are interesting and even helpful to you. If not, I hope that new ones will be.


--Zeitgespenst (talk) 15:27, 10 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Christophe, hope you are well. Thanks for the note about the work you plan for your students to undertake. I hope both they and Wikipedia benefit from it! If you are interested, there is some information available about current and past school/university projects at Wikipedia:School and university projects. I've added a couple of sentences about yours to that page (feel free to correct what I wrote!). I'll try to watch Leucate and its talk page in case I see anyone struggling. It will be interesting to see what differences are found between the different language projects. Splash - tk 13:33, 6 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Argeles

[edit]

hallo ! I am going on vacation for a week, but then i can help you for this article if you want ! I am in Perpignan, so I got lots of data ! bis gleich --Xaviateur (talk) 12:43, 10 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Quesiton about railroad terminology

[edit]

I noticed in the Pfälzische Nordbahn article you used the sentence "The line deserves the cities of Deidesheim, Bad Dürkheim, Freinsheim, and Grünstadt" (emphasis added). I also noticed you used the word "deserves" and "deserved" in a similar context in other railway articles. I don't understand exactly what this means, although I suspect you're using it to mean it serves those stops, or perhaps it stops at those stations on its route. Is this what you mean? I'm not familiar with the use of the word "deserves" in this context. Thanks for helping clear it up, and great work on the rail line articles. Shadowjams (talk) 07:38, 13 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The article Opération Serval has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable event, WP:NOT#NEWS

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WWGB (talk) 13:27, 12 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Opération Serval for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Opération Serval is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Opération Serval until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. WWGB (talk) 13:35, 12 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

July 2013

[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Delphine Batho may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • met fin aux fonctions de Delphine '']. In: [[Le Monde]] du 2.7.2013 (retrieved on 2. .7. 2013)]</ref>. She was previously named ''ministre délégué'' at the French [[Ministry of Justice (France)|

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 17:08, 2 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:33, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

[edit]

Hello, Christophe Neff. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, Christophe Neff. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The article Pierre-Yves Le Borgn' has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Natureium (talk) 01:17, 1 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]