User talk:Christoforos18

Nomination of Panayiotis Therapontos for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Panayiotis Therapontos is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Panayiotis Therapontos until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sir Sputnik (talk) 06:08, 3 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Transfermarkt

Since most of its content is user generated, transfermarkt is not a reliable source. Please do not cite the website in articles, as you did with Anastasios Kantoutsis. Thank you. Sir Sputnik (talk) 18:42, 27 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

June 2016

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Ivan Runje. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Giant Snowman 17:49, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Ivan Runje. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Giant Snowman 18:22, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Matt Derbyshire

I have reverted your edits to Matt Derbyshire as they were unsourced. Please don't add unsourced content to Wikipedia articles.

Please feel free to re-add this content when a Reliable Source is available to support it. Cheers, Gricehead (talk) 20:22, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

February 2017

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Stephane Aziz Ki, without citing a reliable source using an inline citation that clearly supports the material. The burden is on the person wishing to keep in the material to meet these requirements, as a necessary (but not always sufficient) condition. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. As I've already explained to you, Transfermarkt is a user-generated, and therefore unreliable source. Please stop citing it. Sir Sputnik (talk) 19:45, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Apollonas Vasiliou) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Apollonas Vasiliou, Christoforos18!

Wikipedia editor Boleyn just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Thanks for taking the time and trouble to create this - it's appreciated. It's now been reviewed and has had some improvement tags added. If you have the time, could you look it over and see if you can help address any of the issues raised in the tags? Thanks again for your hard work.

To reply, leave a comment on Boleyn's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Boleyn (talk) 09:19, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

May 2017

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Andreas Fragkeskou. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. I've explained this to you a few times already. Because most of its content is user-generated, Transfermarkt is not a reliable source. If you continue to cite it in articles, you may be blocked from editing. Sir Sputnik (talk) 14:50, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Foivos Christodoulou

The article Foivos Christodoulou has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sir Sputnik (talk) 14:02, 8 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Foivos Christodoulou for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Foivos Christodoulou is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Foivos Christodoulou until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sir Sputnik (talk) 14:20, 11 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

July 2018

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Tomás Mejías. Mattythewhite (talk) 17:51, 9 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Tomás Mejías, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Unsourced content. Mattythewhite (talk) 15:28, 11 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Mattythewhite (talk) 20:55, 11 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did on Tomás Mejías. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Mattythewhite (talk) 15:03, 13 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Jordan Greenidge

The article Jordan Greenidge has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sir Sputnik (talk) 01:57, 18 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

July 2018

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Jordan Greenidge, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. I've explained to you a few times already that Transfermarkt is not a reliable source. Please stop citing it in articles. Sir Sputnik (talk) 01:59, 18 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did on Richard Soumah. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Giant Snowman 15:56, 20 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Jordan Greenidge for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jordan Greenidge is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jordan Greenidge until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sir Sputnik (talk) 20:43, 18 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

August 2018

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Richard Soumah. Giant Snowman 10:57, 2 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Giant Snowman 11:29, 2 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

August 2018

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did on Andreas Makris (footballer). This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Mattythewhite (talk) 19:38, 28 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

September 2018

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did on Richard Soumah. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Giant Snowman 14:33, 2 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Christoforos18. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 29

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Charalampos Mavrias, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Winger (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:10, 29 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 2

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited André Vidigal, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Winger (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:41, 2 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

July 2019

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Tomás Mejías. Mattythewhite (talk) 19:42, 2 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there - Wikipedia relies on reliable sources to verify information, especially about living people. I have found and added a source for your changes to the Francis Uzoho article, but please ensure you include one yourself in future. Please let me know if you have any questions or queries. Thanks, Giant Snowman 14:26, 4 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Thanks for creating Nikolas Panayiotou.

User:QueerEcofeminist while reviewing this page as a part of our page curation process had the following comments:

Please add reliable references to the article.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|QueerEcofeminist}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

QueerEcofeminist^{"cite! even if you fight"!!!} [they/them/their] 18:31, 11 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:18, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

May 2020

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Andreas Makris (footballer), you may be blocked from editing. Mattythewhite (talk) 14:56, 23 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 24

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Pafos FC, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Zdeněk Folprecht. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:37, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Transfermarkt again

As I've explained to you several times already, Transfermarkt is not considered a reliable source, as much of its content is user-edited. Please do not cite the website in articles, as you did with Konstantinos Venizelou. Thank you. Sir Sputnik (talk) 20:10, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:45, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

January 2021

Hi there - Wikipedia relies on reliable sources to verify information, especially about living people. You didn't provide a source for your changes to the Kevin Lafrance article, and I couldn't find one either. If you have a reliable source please let me know and we can change the article. Please let me know if you have any questions. Giant Snowman 15:01, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Carlos Eduardo Oliveira Dias. I've explained to you on five separate occasions already that Transfermarkt is not a considered a reliable source and should not be cited in articles. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Sir Sputnik (talk) 17:34, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 20

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ernest Asante, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Winger.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Position format

See Wikipedia:WikiProject Football/Players. Nehme₁₄₉₉ 14:19, 23 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ANI notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Giant Snowman 20:08, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:46, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

March 2022

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Constantinos Christou. You've been told time and again that Transfermarkt is not considered a reliable source. Stop citing in articles. Sir Sputnik (talk) 15:35, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

July 2022

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Sir Sputnik (talk) 01:44, 5 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You've been warned many times over to stop citing Transfermarkt, and yet you continue to do so, most recently at Aggelos Zefkis. Do this again, and the next block will be considerably longer. Sir Sputnik (talk) 01:46, 5 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Aggelos Zefkis

Hello, Christoforos18

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Bruxton, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I’ve proposed an article that you started, Aggelos Zefkis, for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. To prevent the deletion, please add a reference to the article. You may remove the deletion tag yourself once the article has at least one reliable source.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Bruxton}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Bruxton (talk) 01:38, 6 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Capital letters

Hello. In English, a playing position in the middle of a sentence should begin with a small letter, not a CAPITAL LETTER. Positions have capitals at the beginning of a sentence, or as a column heading, but not in mid-sentence. So we write "he plays as a forward or winger", not "he plays as a Forward or Winger". I noticed at Danny Blum you changed a sentence like that to use capitals: in English, that's wrong. I've undone it now at Danny Blum, but please try and remember not to make that sort of change again. Thanks, Struway2 (talk) 16:20, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:24, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Constantinos Christou for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Constantinos Christou is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Constantinos Christou until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 21:44, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Constantinos Christou

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Constantinos Christou requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Constantinos Christou. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Dylan | ✉ | ✓ 17:37, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

May 2023

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text at the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Sir Sputnik (talk) 21:37, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

As I explained in my last block explanation, you really should know by now that Transfermarkt is not a reliable source, and that continuing to cite it anyway is disruptive. Do that again, and the next block will likely be indefinite. Sir Sputnik (talk) 21:39, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Aggelos Zefkis for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Aggelos Zefkis is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aggelos Zefkis until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

GGT (talk) 08:09, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:45, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]