User talk:ChristianJosephAllbee

Welcome

Hello ChristianJosephAllbee, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page – I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.

Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:

Table of contents

Department directory

Need help?

Questions – a guide on where to ask questions
Cheatsheet – quick reference on Wikipedia's mark-up codes
Wikipedia's 5 pillars – an overview of Wikipedia's foundations

Article wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
The simplified ruleset – a summary of Wikipedia's most important rules
Guide to Wikipedia – a thorough step-by-step guide to Wikipedia

How you can help:

Contributing to Wikipedia – a guide on how you can help

Community portal – Wikipedia's hub of activity

Additional tips...

Please sign your messages on talk pages with four tildes (~~~~). This will automatically insert your "signature" (your username and a date stamp). The or button, on the tool bar above Wikipedia's text editing window, also does this.

If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills the Sandbox is for you.

ChristianJosephAllbee, good luck, and have fun. – Spike Wilbury (talk) 16:45, 7 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Meg White

Hi. I removed what you added to the Meg White article. The article doesn't need to consider the opinions of no-one in particular and it's not enough to say she is "often criticised". Who criticises her playing? Why are their opinions notable? Can you cite them? Thanks. --Escape Orbit ^(Talk) 19:03, 29 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Almost forgot; you also can't decide that someone has "effectively retired" because you personally have not heard much from them. That counts as your opinion. I don't know what White is doing, or what she intends doing in future, but it can only be said that White has retired from the industry if White herself has said so. --Escape Orbit ^(Talk) 19:09, 29 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough. --ChristianJosephAllbee ^(Talk) 15:15, 29 June 2013 (CDT)

"Minor" edits

Hello, I noticed that you are in the habit of marking all of your edits as "minor". This designation is really only for completely uncontroversial and small edits, like adding a missing period to a sentence. Things that no one would care about. Some people have their watchlist set up to omit "minor" edits for this reason. If you are making any kind of material change to an article that someone might want to review, please do not mark it as minor. Thanks! --Spike Wilbury (talk) 16:19, 3 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

March 2015

Hello, I'm Caper454. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Geezer Butler, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Caper454 (talk) 15:16, 20 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

re: Geezer Butler playing keyboards

Per guidelines:

Instruments listed in the infobox should be limited to only those that the artist is primarily known for using. The instruments infobox parameter is not intended as a WP:COATRACK for every instrument the subject has ever used.

Caper454 (talk) 12:22, 25 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

March 2016

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Avril Lavigne. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted or removed.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. 4TheWynne^{(talk)(contribs)} 08:35, 10 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Resurrection (New Found Glory album), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages David Wood and Matt Pryor. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:43, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

May 2016

Greetings. At least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to Untitled tenth Metallica studio album, did not appear to be constructive and has been or will be reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. 4TheWynne^{(talk)(contribs)} 03:02, 6 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

June 2016

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Robert Downey Jr.. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be undone.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. 4TheWynne^{(talk)(contribs)} 01:45, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

August 2016

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Space Jam. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Diff: [1] Summaries of critical response need to be supported by direct attribution to reliable sources. Additionally the WikiProject Film community is averse to "mixed to _____" language, since none of the usual critical response aggregators like Metacritic or Rotten Tomatoes use this phrasing. The "mixed to ____" typically represents synthesis, i.e. the combination of two different pieces of information to arrive at a conclusion not expressly stated by either of the two sources. Thanks. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 19:26, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, ChristianJosephAllbee. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

bday

We are birthday twins! :) happy early birthday!! --Jennica✿ / ^talk 18:52, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Birthday to you as well :) --ChristianJosephAllbee✿ / ^talk 22:27, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 17

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Keith Richards, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Blue & Lonesome. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:53, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 27

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Star Wars: Jedi Starfighter, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ross King. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:54, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, ChristianJosephAllbee. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Alan White (Yes drummer), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Steve Howe (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:50, 3 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

September 2018

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

I noticed your recent edit to John Cooper (musician) does not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! Walter Görlitz (talk) 23:40, 14 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm PatGallacher. Your recent edit to the page Helena Bonham Carter appears to have added incorrect information, so it has been removed for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. PatGallacher (talk) 16:06, 30 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, ChristianJosephAllbee. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

FYI

The NY Post does not mention who will provide Yoda's voice in the next SW film. Please do not re-add the info without providing a WP:RS. MarnetteD|Talk 13:18, 9 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep recording personnel alphabetized

You keep undoing the alphabetized personnel, please stop. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ballstothewallcabral (talk • contribs) 13:42, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

April 2019

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

I noticed your recent edit to Superman IV: The Quest for Peace does not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Also, it seems a little odd to me that you have a template stating you're new to Wikipedia given that you've now been here over five years and have made over 1,500 edits. :) DonIago (talk) 13:12, 23 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop making unnecessary changes

Hello! It appears you're quite new to Wikipedia and so I'll be a little easy but you need to stop "cleaning up" "tightening" and making pages more "compact". These changes that you are making are not necessary and can lead to confusion, another thing you often do is re-order personnel to fit your preferences. These are your preferences and these personnel sections should stay alphabetized. One last note regarding "personnel", when a musician is also a producer/engineer you often remove them from the production section; please stop this as it then inaccurately reflects the production team as they are no longer listed in the "production" section. Please be more thoughtful of your edits, and have a nice day.

- Nicholas — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ballstothewallcabral (talk • contribs) 01:57, 24 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It just so happens that I have been editing since late 2013. Out of all the people that have edited the Tom Petty pages, you're the only one that has a problem with the way I have fixed them. I make these edits in order to accommodate people with short reading attention spans and I do not feel that they are unnecessary and are in fact practical. I'm sorry that you feel they add nothing, but I stand by every edit I have made to the pages. ChristianJosephAllbee (talk) 03:06, 24 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The Rescuers Down Under

You are trying to say Disney was reluctant to do further animated sequels due to the performance of this film.

Your first edit stated this directly, without a source. This is original research.

Your second attempt added the unsourced fact (that there were no animated sequels in the following years) in a paragraph about box office receipts. This is implying the same unsourced connection. Please see WP:SYN. - SummerPhD^v2.0 14:55, 22 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

On the contrary, what I said was that there were no theatrical animated sequels (but plenty of direct-to-video sequels). I don't feel that a source for this is entirely necessary because of how obvious it is. I understand where you're coming from with the box office performance, but the fact of the matter is that this was the last theatrical animated sequel to be released until 2002

ChristianJosephAllbee (talk) 15:14, 22 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You are adding a fact to the article about The Rescuers Down Under in such a way as to imply that the box office performance of the film caused Disney to not release further theatrical animated sequels in following years.

A: Box office returns were below expectations.

B: There were no theatrical animated sequels in the following years.

C: A caused B.

You do not have a source for statement B that directly refers to this film, the subject of the article. You do not have a source for statement C at all; it is synthesis.

Additionally, the sourced statement is that the film's box office results were below what the studio expected. "Box office bomb" implies something altogether different and should not be linked. (The film grossed over $47 million. The 20th highest that year was Edward Scissorhands at $56 million. That's not "highly unsuccessful or unprofitable" by any stretch of the imagination, unless the film's production costs were substantially higher than there is any reason to believe they were.) - SummerPhD^v2.0 19:58, 23 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 13

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Mind's Eye (album), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ray Wilson (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:18, 13 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

September 2019

Hello, I'm Wallyfromdilbert. Your recent edit(s) to the page Dumbo (2019 film) appears to have added incorrect information, so it has been removed for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. – Wallyfromdilbert (talk) 03:29, 4 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Community Insights Survey

Share your experience in this survey

Hi ChristianJosephAllbee,

The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey about your experience with Wikipedia and Wikimedia. The purpose of this survey is to learn how well the Foundation is supporting your work on wiki and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 16:01, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Scott Stap within Art of Anarchy

I know it's complicated but raises the question: is Scott Stapp still in Art of Anarchy? He allegedly refused to promote The Madness, but that doesn't mean he is out untill it's official. Is it official? o.-

Regards: The Mad Hatter (talk)

There has been no word on Stapp's status in the band one way or the other as of yet. Until there is a definitive statement from the band members themselves, Stapp is officially still a member.

Regards: User:ChristianJosephAllbee (talk)

Reminder: Community Insights Survey

Share your experience in this survey

Hi ChristianJosephAllbee,

A couple of weeks ago, we invited you to take the Community Insights Survey. It is the Wikimedia Foundation’s annual survey of our global communities. We want to learn how well we support your work on wiki. We are 10% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! Your voice matters to us.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 15:38, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 28

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Suicide Squad (film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Soft reboot (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:24, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder: Community Insights Survey

Share your experience in this survey

Hi ChristianJosephAllbee,

There are only a few weeks left to take the Community Insights Survey! We are 30% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! With this poll, the Wikimedia Foundation gathers feedback on how well we support your work on wiki. It only takes 15-25 minutes to complete, and it has a direct impact on the support we provide.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 20:39, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

October 2019

Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to The Wild Thornberrys Movie, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. SummerPhD^v2.0 17:39, 24 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 5

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Transformers: Dark of the Moon, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page David Warner (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:30, 5 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

November 2019

Thank you for your contributions. One of your recent contributions to Deadpool 2 has been reverted or removed, because it contains speculative or unconfirmed information about a future event. Please only add material about future events if it is verifiable, based on a reliable source. Material concerning a sequel should only be added once development is confirmed. The source you provided was only speculative. Etzedek24 ^{(I'll talk at ya) (Check my track record)} 19:27, 6 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:16, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 20

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Transformers (film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Soft reboot (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:08, 20 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

December 2019

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

I noticed your recent edit to Superman in film does not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. I was wondering why you removed a whole section about a movie, since you didn't explain why. It led me to assume that you removed it for no reason. Perhaps next time an edit summary would be helpful. Cheers! INeedSupport ^:V 01:10, 11 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Moxy. I noticed that you recently removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Moxy 🍁 01:12, 11 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 30

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited RotoSound, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mr. Big (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:23, 30 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 9

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Suicide Squad (film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Soft reboot (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 13:28, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

March 2020

Can you please use edit summaries? I cannot read your mind. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 12:09, 4 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 5

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ross Valory, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page AOR (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 12:08, 5 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 16

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Got Me Under Pressure, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Frank Beard (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 17:07, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop speculating about Hawk Nelson's future

Hi. We cannot say more than the sources do about Jon Steingard's departure from the band. https://heavy.com/news/2020/05/jon-steingard-hawk-nelson-renounces-faith/ states that "he has stopped believing in God", but the only mention I see about putting things on hold are in relation to his son. Am I misreading the article? In fact, he states "he was open to the idea that God was there" so this sounds more like deconstructing his faith than loss of it (which is my own original research on his writing). Hoeever, there is no commentary on the band's future in that article and making any claims that there is, is original research. Walter Görlitz (talk) 00:42, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Is Peter Furler or Phil Joel listed at https://www.facebook.com/pg/newsboys.official/about ? They're really just tour guests who used to be band members. Walter Görlitz (talk) 20:28, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

May 2020

Hello, I'm Doniago. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to The Real Ghostbusters seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Please don't use words like "ironically" in articles; we shouldn't be editorializing in this manner. Stick to the facts. Thanks! DonIago (talk) 13:45, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

June 2020

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

I noticed your recent edit to Birds of Prey (2020 film) does not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! KyleJoan^talk 03:33, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 7

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of The Ren & Stimpy Show cast and crew members, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cheryl Chase.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:09, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

August 2020

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Tom and Jerry: The Movie. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. SummerPhD^v2.0 05:31, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

September 2020

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at Hobbs & Shaw, you may be blocked from editing. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 02:13, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

SPI

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/ChristianJosephAllbee regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Armegon (talk) 06:29, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

October 2020

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Dig It (Beatles song). Sundayclose (talk) 00:24, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:34, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 6

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Talking Cricket, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The New Adventures of Pinocchio.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:39, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your recent contributions, such as your edit to the page Ian Anderson, have removed content without a good reason to do so. Content on Wikipedia should not be removed just because you disagree with it or because you think it's wrong, unless the claim is not verifiable. Instead, you should consider expanding the article with noteworthy and verifiable information of your own, citing reliable sources when you do so. If you'd like to experiment with the wiki's syntax, please do so in the sandbox rather than in articles. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Contributing to Wikipedia
How to edit a page
Editing tutorial
Picture tutorial
How to write a great article
Naming conventions
Simplified Manual of Style
Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:

Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
Maintain a neutral point of view – this is one of Wikipedia's core policies.
Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page and follow Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
No edit warring or abuse of multiple accounts.
If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to do so.
Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject; doing so will result in your account or IP being blocked from editing.
Do not use talk pages as discussion or forum pages as Wikipedia is not a forum.

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! Stroness (talk) 16:09, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

April 2021

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 15:10, 27 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

What you just did at James Woods, that's the kind of thing that might get you blocked per the above discretionary sanctions. The sources are clear: they don't talk about "controversial views" or whatever--it's lies and conspiracy theories. So be mindful, and leave your personal POV out of article space, especially out of BLPs. I'll ping User:Ritchie333, just in case, and I am going to add another DS template below, since it also applies to these edits. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 13:08, 4 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

July 2021

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at DC Talk. Four times editors have formally asked you to submit edit summaries. The requests date back to September 2018. There are other edits here making the request. You continue to edit without supplying edit summaries. It makes it difficult to understand why you're making the edits you make and not all of your edits make sense or are even remotely correct. Walter Görlitz (talk) 23:28, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

October 2021

Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Scoob!, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. – wallyfromdilbert (talk) 18:05, 6 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Everything I added is based collectively on what was stated in reviews as seen in the "Critical reception" paragraph. It is added as a way to make a quick read for visitors. ChristianJosephAllbee (talk) 18:12, 6 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

That is not true at all. None of it was supported by reviews in the "critical reception section", and the only review that even mentioned "pop culture references" actually praised them, unlike the criticism you claimed in your edit. – wallyfromdilbert (talk) 18:27, 6 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Birds of Prey (2020 film). This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. You've been reverted for inserting that link before, so please open a discussion about it on the talk page. Thanks. KyleJoan^talk 02:58, 12 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Musical instruments in Infobox

~~Secondary instruments are not listed in the infobox, they're meant to be brought up in the article body per Infobox musical artist. - FlightTime (open channel) 22:00, 22 October 2021 (UTC)~~[reply]

That's why I removed it. What I meant by the message was that an instrument WAS added (not that I added it myself) without a consensus and I removed it because of that. ChristianJosephAllbee (talk) 22:05, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

November 2021

Hello, I'm InfiniteNexus. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Spider-Man: Into the Spider-Verse seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. InfiniteNexus (talk) 04:51, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:39, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Standards

Two years ago, despite having been editing Wikipedia for six years before that, you did not know that you do not use contractions in formal writing [2]. Are you still making errors like this, or have you learned how to write properly in the meantime? DSMN-IHSAGT (talk) 22:22, 5 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@DSMN-IHSAGT: you'll want to review WP:CIVIL and WP:AGF here. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 21:04, 6 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Paul Dano

Hi ChristianJosephAllbee. I reverted [3] your edit to Paul Dano because the current article content does not support such prominence, and it detracts from his notability. If you disagree, let's discuss it. Thanks.--Hipal (talk) 17:09, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons. Thank you. --Hipal (talk) 01:22, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

March 2022

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I wanted to let you know that your recent edit(s) to the plot summary of Spider-Man: No Way Home have been removed because they added a significant amount of unnecessary detail. Please avoid excessive detail and high word counts when editing plot summaries/synopses. You may read the plot summary edit guides to learn more about contributing constructively to plot summaries/synopses. There are also specific guidelines for films, musicals, television episodes, anime/manga, novels and non-fiction books. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you.

Centcom08 (talk) 11:45, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

May 2022

Hello, I'm Centcom08. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Doctor Strange in the Multiverse of Madness, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Centcom08 (talk) 14:02, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ian Anderson - instruments

Hello, I reverted [4] your recent edit to Ian Anderson because as per the 'hidden note' for the infobox, changes to instruments within this should not be changed without first reaching a consensus on the talk page. If you feel there is a good reason for changing 'acoustic guitar' (which is most accurate) to 'guitar' as per your noted intent, please make the case on the article talk page first. Regards Stroness (talk) 13:22, 29 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

July 2022

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Star Trek (film), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 04:17, 10 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 7

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Acoustic bass guitar, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Primus.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:18, 7 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 11

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Godzilla vs. Biollante, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page PG.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:05, 11 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

September 2022

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Patient Number 9. FMSky (talk) 15:42, 13 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deadpool 3

FYI, Marvel's official website refers to the film as Deadpool 3. - Richiekim (talk) 23:18, 27 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

October 2022

Hello, I'm Stroness. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Alan Moore, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Stroness (talk) 10:59, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

November 2022

Hello, I'm Stroness. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, King Crimson, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Stroness (talk) 15:29, 21 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:26, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Black Adam

Dropping a quick note that I reverted a recent edit of yours, since it appears to be based on original research. We cannot summarize a film's reception; only secondary sources can. If you believe this is a mistake and needs further discussion, feel free to participate at Talk:Black Adam (film)#Critical summary in the lead. Thank you. GoneIn60 (talk) 16:45, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Affleck at The Flash (film)

Hello, I just wanted to let you know why I have removed your addition to the Ben Affleck information at the article, and have noticed you've readded it. Affleck said at the time of the interview that his role in The Flash was a nice finish to the character. The Aquaman 2 reshoots for a cameo came after that, although we do not need to state every forthcoming appearance of a character, even after the actor says they are done. We also do not know any character or plot details on Affleck's cameo, and those would be helpful to state at The Flash article, but more so at the Aquaman 2 article as this is about the part he played in The Flash film. Trailblazer101 (talk) 00:55, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The Hollywood Reporter and Deadline on Black Adam

Hello Christian, you reverted my edit where I removed your claim about producer Joe Singer's comments in a Deadline, as you made it seem like Singer was rebutting THR's report about a being sequel being unlikely.

While the Deadline and THR report were published on the same day, the THR report was published later than the Deadline article.

This can be confirmed by checking the timestamps. The Deadline article was published at 11:45 am, while the THR report was published at 4:17 pm. So please do not use an article published earlier than another as a rebuttal of it.

Also after THR published its report, Deadline edited its article to remove its claims about a Black Adam sequel and Hawkman spinoff being in development [5]. While retaining Joe Singer's comments.

It's abundantly clear the Deadline article was published earlier. Please don't confuse what the two articles or use Deadline as a rebuttal of THR. I've regardless removed the THR article as it's no longer necessary and just speculation. Thank you. Roman Reigns Fanboy (talk) 03:01, 21 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Film reception in the lead

Please do not add your own Rotten Tomatoes-style critical consensus using synthesis. Per MOS:FILM: The overall critical reception to a film should be supported by attributions to reliable sources that summarize reviews; do not synthesize individual reviews. We already have Rotten Tomatoes, which tells us what critics thought. We don't need you to add your own IMDb review to the lead, too. Speaking as an administrator, I see that you have a page full of warnings like this, including a final warning. I really dislike this whole "final final warning" that we sometimes do on Wikipedia, but you really need to stop ignoring both policy and warnings on your talk page. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 19:16, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

DC Universe

Hello, I just wanted to inform you that the reason I have reverted your edits at DC Universe (franchise) before and continually is because, as I explained in my edit summaries, we should explain to readers who may not be familiar with what these topics are what the DCEU is. As for your most recent contribution there, it introduced a run-on sentence, removed helpful clarity on the exact notion of Superman: Legacy being the true start, among others that I detailed in my summary. Please, make sure you check edit summaries when you notice your contributions have been undone, as there are usually editors willing to explain themselves through them, and communication is vital in ensuring Wikipedia functions. Trailblazer101 (talk) 03:21, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

King Crimson

Hello, I've reverted your edits at King Crimson regarding KC being a band in the past tense. A band may still be active despite there being no tours planned and the absence of any confimed "plan" is nowhere near sufficient to declare a group as having retired. There is a conversation in the Talk page regarding the ongoing status of the band and if you have any strong evidence to support your claims, please provide it there so as to build a consensus on whether or not the band are indeed "retired". Stroness (talk) 10:35, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 14

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Tomorrowverse, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Soft reboot.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 16

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Atom Willard, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Derek Grant.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You've got mail

Hello, ChristianJosephAllbee. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.TheDuck8 (talk) 00:49, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I just sent you a private message.

June 2023

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit of yours to the page DC Universe (franchise) has an edit summary that appears to be inadequate, inaccurate, or inappropriate. The summaries are helpful to people browsing an article's history, so it is important that you use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did. Feel free to use the sandbox to make test edits. I strongly encourage you to provide a detailed explanation of your changes, as opposed to stating "Fixed" when in fact there is nothing to fix. It better helps everyone in contextualizing what your edits are. Trailblazer101 (talk) 04:49, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

August 2023

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 02:59, 4 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

September 2023

Please read WP:LEAD. It's supposed to cover things already mentioned in the background section of an article. Please stop removing that important point out of the intro. Thanks. Sergecross73 msg me 21:53, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please be more detailed on your credits as well. Your additions made it look like featured artists played on the whole album, when as far as we know, they're relegated to a single song. Sergecross73 msg me 23:04, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please start opening up talk pages discussion rather than continually reverting? Thank you. Sergecross73 msg me 18:28, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

November 2023

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 03:40, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:43, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

John Ratzenberger

"He is set to return in some upcoming Pixar projects."[6] - source for this? Iggy (Swan) (Contribs) 17:12, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

He is slated to appear in “Inside Out 2” and also reprised his role as the Abominable Snowman in “Monsters At Work”, both of which are post-2020 releases. ChristianJosephAllbee (talk) 19:58, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

July 2024

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 01:59, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Improper citing methodology and including Facebook trackback links in references

Greetings ChistianJosephAllbee, I will initially state that I was very tempted to issue a lvl4 warning with regards to your most recent edit on Phil Collins, because you very obviously have a lengthy history of improper citations and recent, repeating account sanctions for them. However - in an attempt to help keep you out of further trouble and try to correct the issue I wanted to give you some feedback here, instead.

Firstly - please be sure not to include tracking portions of URLs that you use for references. The raw URL to the exact, cited source is what is necessary - none of the ancillary tracking info which leads back to the original site which held the link you may have clicked on.

Second - simply putting a URL in between <ref> </ref> tags is not the appropriate method for citing web published news sources. There are features in the editor to aid you in properly completing the cite fields. Please make sure you thoroughly review WP:CITE and Help:Citation_Style_1#Online_sources to help you properly fill in and complete the necessary citation fields. This also helps preventing the need for other editors to come in behind you and clean up the references.

If you have any questions please feel free to reach out to me. Thanks. --Picard's Facepalm • ^{Made It So} _Engage! • 19:39, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Slash

Please see MOS:SLASH. Then please revert this recent edit.(diff) Thanks. -- 109.77.199.48 (talk) 01:03, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]