User talk:Chrisjnelson/Archive 27

Jay Cutler

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Jay Cutler. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. Grsz¹¹ 18:16, 3 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

ANI Notice

Hello, Chrisjnelson. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Landon1980 (talk) 19:44, 3 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

An idea for roster templates

Here's an idea: once they are announced, how about doing something on the roster templates to indicate who team captains are? Ringerfan23 (talk) 23:36, 3 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Most teams don't officially announce them. Therefore it would be WP:OR. Pats1 ^T/C 23:45, 3 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Isn't it normally the 4 guys who go up for the cointoss and wear the giant "C" on there jerseys?Ringerfan23 (talk) 00:53, 4 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Some teams don't have the C's on their jerseys (Pats, Raiders, some others). Most teams have more than 4 guys for the cointosses, and it changes. Pats1 ^T/C 17:19, 4 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox NFLactive

Hello, Chrisjnelson. You have new messages at Template talk:Infobox NFLactive.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Cra sh Underride 18:41, 4 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep an eye out

For this one. Apparently he's stuck in 2002.. and a cowboys fan.. a bad combo. Ringerfan23 (talk) 22:53, 5 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Best football infobox yet.

Have a look here. It nullifies all the ones we currently have. It's got room for death date and place. I even fixed it so that the stats section won't say NFL when the person plays in the CFL or AFL. I know, I know, it could probably stand to lose some stuff, but have a look and tell me what you think. I promise you, it's better than the ones we have now, includin' all the ones I made prior. However, there is a problem I was wonderin' if you could help me with, for the "Final season" section, right below the "Professional debut," I can't get it unbolded. I used the forumla for the stats header here so that when it's not needed it'll be gone and only appear when needed. However, I tried to use the forumula that the debut header uses, but I couldn't get it too disappear. Other than just bein' bold, it works as it should. Bust as I said, I know I may have gone into too much detail with it, lol, I was excited that I got it workin' for the most part. (Sorry for any mistakes above, I'm typin' with just one Shift key.) :D Thanks for the help, Cra sh Underride 21:54, 6 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'll look more at it later, but I definitely thing it needs to lose the separate awards section and the college stats. Not worth it.►Chris Nelson^Holla! 22:39, 6 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Looks nice, but I agree with Chris, needs to lose the separate high school awards and college stats and awards things, other than that it looks great. Plus, it could get rid of the two infobox stuff.--Giants27 ^T/C 22:53, 6 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Maurice Hicks

Should those pages be listed as References or External links? If the latter, I'll have to tag the page as unreferenced, because external links are NOT article references. Rklear (talk) 18:18, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, they should.►Chris Nelson^Holla! 19:20, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfDs

Plummer

Why do you keep putting Plummer in the reserves list at Tampa!

He is Retierd! He is not coming back to football and the Buccaneers and Plummer agreed to the repayment of the signing bonus he was given so their business is finished.

Delete him, it is never going to happen! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Greggles83 (talk • contribs) 09:54, 9 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You're right - he's never going to play again. But he's still not technically retired.►Chris Nelson^Holla! 15:00, 9 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Seth McKinney

How do you know he signed with the Bills? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bills2oo8 (talk • contribs) 20:04, 9 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

[1]►Chris Nelson^Holla! 22:40, 9 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

FYI

Did you know your sandbox looks like this?--Giants27 ^T/C 00:56, 11 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Haha no, that's funny.►Chris Nelson^Holla! 03:43, 11 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Soi

Don't use reflist|2 when there's only 1 source, because it will end up screwing up the formatting. Reflist|2 divides it into two columns (just as reflist|3 does 3), which is nice for Barack Obama, but isn't really needed on Brian Soi. Pats1 ^T/C 02:20, 15 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No, I like it.►Chris Nelson^Holla! 02:58, 15 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

But when there's only 1 source it screws up the formatting of the ref. Check out the old version on Soi. Pats1 ^T/C 11:19, 15 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I saw it. I'm not blind.►Chris Nelson^Holla! 15:03, 15 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AFD

Can you check this out:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dwayne Woods--Yankees10 20:18, 18 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles

Hey, I know you saw this one and I was wondering if you had a chance if you could look at these, two, the second of which looks like this before I re-wrote it.--Giants27 ^T/C 19:21, 19 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Devone Claybrooks

I dont understand your reasoning. What does that mean not in the CFL it wasn't. NFL.com and numerous other sources have it as DeVone.--Yankees10 01:40, 20 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Not all of them. I recall throughout his career it being written different ways. But my point is he played in the CFL for two years most recently, and that entire time the CFL and the Alouettes had it as Devone. That leads me to believe the NFL teams had it wrong.►Chris Nelson^Holla! 01:43, 20 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

How do you know the CFL websites dont have it wrong.--Yankees10 01:47, 20 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

How do you know the NFL ones don't? We don't know either, in which case I say we go with the most recent ones.►Chris Nelson^Holla! 01:50, 20 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ok--Yankees10 02:02, 20 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Edit conflict

What happened to our deal?--Giants27 ^T/C 20:51, 20 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You added Michael Kracalik to the roster, not Mike Kracalik, and Michael Kracalik wasn't a page until I just created it as a redirect a few minutes ago. So since Michael Kracalik was a red link when you added it to the Jets roster, I didn't know if you'd know Mike Kracalik already existed.►Chris Nelson^Holla! 20:52, 20 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Oh no, I fixed it right when you did, although for some reason we didn't edit conflict on that one. But guess that's reasonable since I was about to create it before realizing it was at Mike.--Giants27 ^T/C 20:55, 20 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ah alright. Yeah I wasn't trying to go behind your back, I just didn't know if you'd know to update it since you initially added the red link.►Chris Nelson^Holla! 20:56, 20 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Do me a favor, when I turn around pull the knife out of my back. Seriously though no problem was just wondering.--Giants27 ^T/C 21:06, 20 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Stafford

OK! I´ll still waiting for that —Preceding unsigned comment added by Zta (talk • contribs) 04:53, 25 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

He will be drafted by lions, so i put him at 2009 Lions Draft Picks Template--Zta (talk) 14:12, 25 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

That breaks WP:CRYSTAL because it hasn't happened yet.--Giants27 ^T/C 14:21, 25 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sean Smth

Should Sean Smith (cornerback) be moved to Sean Smith (defensive back)?--Yankees10 01:45, 26 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Not yet.►Chris Nelson^Holla! 01:47, 26 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ok--Yankees10 01:50, 26 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Quoates on player articles

Can you check this out:Wikipedia talk:WikiProject College football#Expert quotes on player articles--Yankees10 13:44, 26 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Glover Quin

Haha, lol--Yankees10 16:56, 26 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Stanley Arnoux

A tag has been placed on Stanley Arnoux requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Tagishsimon (talk) 17:13, 26 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

<sarcasm>Yeah he's definetely not notable, you better delete it quickly.</sarcasm>--Giants27 ^T/C 17:24, 26 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Slade Norris

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and the page that you created has been or soon will be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Tagishsimon (talk) 17:32, 26 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Stop creating pages with crap content

Both of the pages above were created with crap content. The first with the content "cv". the second with content "vjdflbg". Is there any chance that the next page you create could have an english language sentence in it as the first edit. Really, stop wasting people's time. --Tagishsimon (talk) 17:35, 26 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Go back to them now, bud.►Chris Nelson^Holla! 17:36, 26 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Whos time exactly is he wasting?--Yankees10 17:37, 26 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'll clean them up, I've got a lot of time on my hands. lol--Giants27 ^T/C 17:40, 26 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have to been Giants and Yankees, you bastards are too fast haha.►Chris Nelson^Holla! 17:42, 26 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

lol.--Giants27 ^T/C 18:09, 26 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Bear Pascoe

A tag has been placed on Bear Pascoe requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Beeblebrox (talk) 20:25, 26 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Quinten Lawrence

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Quinten Lawrence, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Notability not established.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Wizardman 20:53, 26 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of DeAndre Wright

A tag has been placed on DeAndre Wright requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. RadioFan (talk) 21:13, 26 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Haha

Looks like you've pissed some people off with you're new articles, haha. In fact I'm surpised you have been hit with Template:Uw-create and Template:Uw-speedy yet, stupid recent change patrollers. haha--Giants27 ^T/C 21:39, 26 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, it happens every year because if you don't follow the NFL you have no idea what's going on with these creations.►Chris Nelson^Holla! 21:42, 26 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, can you take a look at Travis Beckum some idiot keeps trying to make it played pcollege football at the University of Madison-Wisconsin and I'm already at 3 reverts. And yeah these people are too busy watching the science channel or whatever else is on tv. haha--Giants27 ^T/C 21:45, 26 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Just let the hype die down. It's not even worth editing all these rookie pages right now, they're just gonna get all messy. Wait a few days.►Chris Nelson^Holla! 21:46, 26 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of John Nalbone

An article that you have been involved in editing, John Nalbone, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Nalbone. Thank you.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Grsz¹¹ 22:02, 26 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This one is legit, as I can see you've had your share of templates today, haha. Grsz¹¹ 22:02, 26 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

None of the articles I've created will be deleted, including this one. They're all notable.►Chris Nelson^Holla! 22:06, 26 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You've obviously been watching the draft for hours today and yesterday. How long did it take for that stupid Rihanna song to get annoying? My god! Grsz¹¹ 22:21, 26 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Not as annoying as the promo with the steroids retard saying "I think steroids are as American as apple pie!"►Chris Nelson^Holla! 22:33, 26 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No way man I love that promo any promo with Maria Sharapova in it is a good one. haha--Giants27 ^T/C 22:36, 26 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, tumor arms! Grsz¹¹ 22:39, 26 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

See also Nick Schommer for the same reason. Grsz¹¹ 23:56, 26 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Jason McCourty's lack of sources

Hi, I noticed that you created Jason McCourty, but listed no sources for the information contained in the article. According to Wikipedia's content policies, all information must be verifiable from reliable sources. Therefore, it's necessary to cite your sources so other editors can check that the information included in the article is correct and matches the sources used. Information not previously published in such sources is prohibited as original research, since other editors can't verify it. Unsourced information may be challenged and removed at any time, and articles that can't be verified are likely to be deleted. Guidance on how to cite your sources is available, and if you need any further help, feel free to leave a message on my talk page.--Unscented (talk) 22:07, 26 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Blake Schlueter

A tag has been placed on Blake Schlueter requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Eugene Krabs (talk) 22:17, 26 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I seriously thought Eugene Krabs was blocked.--Giants27 ^T/C 22:35, 26 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

April 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Blake Schlueter, a page you have created yourself. If you do not believe the page should be deleted, you can place a {{hangon}} tag on the page, under the existing speedy deletion tag (please do not remove the speedy deletion tag), and make your case on the page's talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. Eugene Krabs (talk) 22:49, 26 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

WP:DTR.--Giants27 ^T/C 23:24, 26 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

UDFAs reply

Yeah sure, no problem--Yankees10 00:27, 27 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

UDFA signings

Where did you find those, not questioning you but I'd just like to know.--Giants27 ^T/C 00:39, 27 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Some KFFL, some NFLDraftBible.►Chris Nelson^Holla! 00:39, 27 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I cant believe how many good ones that are available this year: Darry Beckwith, Brian Hoyer, Mitch King, Dannell Ellerbe, etc. I thought all these guys were going to be drafted at least in the first five rounds--Yankees10 00:42, 27 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Happens every year it seems. It just shows how little everyone knows about where guys are gonna do.►Chris Nelson^Holla! 00:43, 27 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I think the biggest suprise was Beckwith, I remember a couple of months age he was considerd a possible first round pick, and recently before the draft I heard possibley second or third.--Yankees10 00:46, 27 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Linebackers tend to fall it seems. I remember last year I was surprised at the linebackers who didn't get drafted, like J Leman and Erin Henderson.►Chris Nelson^Holla! 00:51, 27 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, another guy was Ali Highsmith--Yankees10 00:54, 27 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yep, him too!►Chris Nelson^Holla! 01:06, 27 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Now, where did you find those other ones that you just did?--Giants27 ^T/C 15:37, 27 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

[2]►Chris Nelson^Holla! 15:39, 27 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Detroit Lions roster

Hi I notice you edit Template:Detroit Lions roster a lot. I'd appreciate it if you when a new player gets signed if you added the relevant info to 2009 Detroit Lions season too. Save me some work. Thanks. TomCat4680 (talk) 07:55, 27 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

TomCat4680 (talk) has given you a kitten! Kittens promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Kittens must be fed three times a day and will be your faithful companion forever! Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a kitten, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend.

Spread the goodness of kittens by adding {{subst:Kitten}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message!

WP:ATHLETE

Hey, can you throw in your $0.2 here?--Giants27 ^T/C 11:34, 27 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Harrell

How does it seem untrue that the Browns signed him to a rookie free agent contract? I'm not going to argue with you about it, I just want to hear your rationale, that's all. If someone's reporting that he signed, I think it's OK to add him for now, until another report refutes it. Wlmaltby3 (talk) 00:04, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Other reports are refuting it. From the Cleveland Plain-Dealer via Rotoworld: "Updating a previous item, Texas Tech QB Graham Harrell has not signed a free agent contract with the Browns. Harrell was invited to Cleveland's upcoming minicamp, but isn't signed."►Chris Nelson^Holla! 00:08, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Right after I left that message for you, I noticed Dallas' Scout.com site reporting that *they* had signed Harrell, so you're right, this one looks like it's up in the air for now. Cheers. Wlmaltby3 (talk) 00:10, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It seems likely he's attending a minicamp on a tryout basis, but news outlets have gotten incomplete info or have made assumptions so now you have reports that guys have signed when they are really just trying out. It happens every year.►Chris Nelson^Holla! 00:12, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I understand. I'll keep my fingers crossed that the Browns grab him, though. That'd be an excellent steal if he turns out to be any good at the pro level. Wlmaltby3 (talk) 01:49, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I think he's capable of being an NFL quarterback. It wasn't all that system.►Chris Nelson^Holla! 02:34, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

He's the steal of the draft in my opinion.--Giants27 ^T/C 02:46, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Teams are so stupid, why would you not take a chance on a guy that threw for over 15,000 yards and 134 touchdowns at least in the seventh round.--Yankees10 02:54, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Darrius Heyward-Bey

Can you help me out with this. The User:Strikehold continues to add mock draft and rankings that are from last April to Darrius Heyward-Bey. I mean come on the Draft order is different and some of the players on there werent even in the draft. Mock drafts arent good sources anway. Thee user doesnt seem to get this--Yankees10 01:10, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

please remove the picture of clifford ray —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.30.79.9 (talk) 02:54, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Huh?►Chris Nelson^Holla! 03:02, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AFD or not

Should I nominate these pages for deletion:Travis Shelton, Jerome Johnson (American football), Britt Davis, Taurus Johnson, Jeff Wolfert, Julian Hawkins, D. J. Boldin, Maurice Lucas (American football), Jason Watkins, Jose Valdez (American football), they are all non-notable college football players that went undrafted. --Yankees10 23:40, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Actually the User:Zta has created a shit load, so should we try to delete them or say to hell with it.--Yankees10 23:47, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'd just wait it out, let's see what happens in the preseason. But send the user a message explaining what our strategy is, and ask ~~him~~ her to stop for now.►Chris Nelson^Holla! 02:55, 29 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Per your edit summary I agree with that never thought girls really edit Wikipedia, maybe that's why this policy came about. haha--Giants27 ^T/C 19:04, 29 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps {{prod}}? Grsz¹¹ 20:55, 29 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

2009 Dolphins draft template

I create a similar template, you create another similar, but doesn´t matters, sorry..►Nastia