User talk:Chrisisreed/Archive 2
The article List of incidents at Parque Warner Madrid has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
A "list" consisting of one incident (in itself not a notable incident but a simple news event) doesn't make a notable subject.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fram (talk) 13:13, 21 March 2018 (UTC)
Copying within Wikipedia requires proper attribution
[edit]
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from List of incidents at Walt Disney World into two other pages. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was moved, attribution is not required. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 14:07, 22 March 2018 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of User:Chrisisreed
[edit]
A tag has been placed on User:Chrisisreed requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Jbh Talk 22:01, 22 March 2018 (UTC)
Use of user space pages
[edit]Wikipedia is not a social media site. Your talk page is intended for collaboration with other users while improving Wikipedia. Your user page can be used to give a brief description of who you are but it is not appropriate to post a resume or material which may be seen a promotional. Nor should your user space be used to host articles. Please see Wikipedia:User pages, WP:NOTSOCIALNETWORK and WP:FAKEARTICLE for our rules. Cheers. Jbh Talk 22:03, 22 March 2018 (UTC)
Contested deletion
[edit]This page should not be speedily deleted because... Hello, I'm not entirely sure why I've been flagged for deletion. All of the edits I've made I've thought they were logical. It said I was flagged for using the Talk Page improperly, I think. I can't really write bureaucratically how things are usually written on the talk page. If someone could explain why I've been nominated in layman's terms I'd appreciate it. Personally I don't think I should be deleted because the edits I've made, I've felt like were logical edits. Plus I created pages that were needed, that had not yet been created, such as Six Flags Power Plant, and List of incidents at Warner Bros. Movie World. I understand I have made some edits in the past that were less than savory like the attempted creation of a Dehliah Draycott page, which in my defense I was 14 when I did so. Than recently I tried to create a page for the Antonia Graza, the fictional ship from the film Ghost Ship (2002 film) Which again in my defense, I figured logically since the Poseidon ship from the movie had one, why wouldn't the Antonia Graza qualify for a page, which I was wrong about. --Chrisisreed (talk) 22:19, 22 March 2018 (UTC)
Hello, Chrisisreed. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Gotham City (Six Flags), for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:
- edit the page
- remove the text that looks like this:
{{proposed deletion/dated...}} - save the page
Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.
Jbh Talk 22:48, 22 March 2018 (UTC)
Nomination of List of incidents at Parque Warner Madrid for deletion
[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of incidents at Parque Warner Madrid is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of incidents at Parque Warner Madrid until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Fram (talk) 06:39, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
The article Singing to the Song of Life has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
No evidence of notability
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fram (talk) 13:35, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Nomination of List of lands at Six Flags theme parks for deletion
[edit]A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of lands at Six Flags theme parks is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of lands at Six Flags theme parks until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ajf773 (talk) 06:13, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:Six Flags-lands
[edit]
Template:Six Flags-lands has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Ajf773 (talk) 06:22, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
The article Parque Warner Madrid Beach has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
no evidence for notability
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DGG ( talk ) 20:54, 27 May 2018 (UTC)
Nomination of Gotham City (Six Flags) for deletion
[edit]A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gotham City (Six Flags) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gotham City (Six Flags) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ajf773 (talk) 18:47, 28 May 2018 (UTC)
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 20:07, 26 July 2018 (UTC)
Warner Bros. Recreational Enterprises
[edit]Please provide a source for all of your edits changing Warner Bros. Theme Parks to Warner Bros. Recreational Enterprises. I don't see any news or third-party articles that reference the name "Warner Bros. Recreational Enterprises." Without a source, it looks like something you made up.—JlACEer (talk) 19:55, 10 August 2018 (UTC)
I don't really know how to write the messages, but anyways. Warner Bros. theme parks was a tag a came up with because I couldn't find the name of their official division name the way Disney has Walt Disney Parks and Resorts. On the Warner Bros. Recreational Enterprises page there are a couple of references that I did find that have the name specifically mentioned. I can't find an official Warner Brothers site for it unfortunately. But anyways since I created the tag "Warner Bros. theme parks" I figured it'd just be best to change them all to the proper name being "Warner Bros. Recreational Enterprises" If you could help me find more about the company division it would be appreciated.Chrisisreed (talk) 20:00, 10 August 2018 (UTC)
- Sorry, it looks like you put a lot of effort into looking up a number of different sources, but I'm not convinced that this entity currently exists. I was unable to find any valid references to Warner Bros. Recreational Enterprises on my own. Given the current information, I'm going to have to support redirection of the page to Warner Bros.—JlACEer (talk) 04:56, 11 August 2018 (UTC)
- I really did put in a lot of effort. I used my college's resource center to find links which is how I found out about Nicholas Winslow. Who I was actually able to speak to yesterday. Our conversation is recorded and on file. I'd be more than happy to share it with you in hopes that it will make you see that the company was real. In our conversation he went into detail about the creation of the park, CV Woods involvement, the expansions of the parks, the decisions he made as president of the company, and the eventual actions resulting in the company being shut down. I really am just trying to record the actual history of the company, and with it being a short lived company in the infancy phase of the internet it's hard to find many references, which is why I went through the trouble of tracking down the former company President.Chrisisreed (talk) 05:08, 11 August 2018 (UTC)
Nomination of Always April for deletion
[edit]A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Always April is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Always April until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 20:57, 10 August 2018 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Always April
[edit]
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Always April requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a musical recording which does not indicate why its subject is important or significant, and where the artist's article does not exist or is eligible for deletion itself. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for music.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 20:58, 10 August 2018 (UTC)
Nomination of Warner Bros. Recreational Enterprises for deletion
[edit]A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Warner Bros. Recreational Enterprises is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Warner Bros. Recreational Enterprises until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 20:58, 10 August 2018 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Warner Bros. Theatre Ventures logo.png
[edit]
Thanks for uploading File:Warner Bros. Theatre Ventures logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:47, 17 August 2018 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Warner Bros.' Jungle Habitat Ticket.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:Warner Bros.' Jungle Habitat Ticket.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:39, 20 October 2018 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Movie World Studios (Warner Bros.)
[edit]If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Movie World Studios (Warner Bros.) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 07:37, 24 October 2018 (UTC)
Movie World Studios moved to draftspace
[edit]An article you recently created, Movie World Studios, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. Currently, the all of the citations go to websites run by the park, which are not independent.
I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. signed, Rosguill talk 06:04, 25 October 2018 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Movie World Studios has been accepted
[edit]
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
JC7V-talk 05:21, 27 October 2018 (UTC)
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 20:57, 30 October 2018 (UTC)
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 22:45, 30 October 2018 (UTC)
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:04, 9 November 2018 (UTC)
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:07, 9 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]
Hello, Chrisisreed. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
MfD nomination of WP:WikiProject Warner
[edit]
WP:WikiProject Warner, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/WikiProject Warner and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of WP:WikiProject Warner during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 17:51, 22 November 2018 (UTC)
Ways to improve Quest for Camelot Dragon Games
[edit]Hello, Chrisisreed,
Welcome to Wikipedia and thanks for creating Quest for Camelot Dragon Games! I edit here too, under the username Rosguill}} and it's nice to meet you:-)
I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-
As another editor has pointed out, the article could use more references to reliable sources in order to establish the subject's notability.
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Rosguill}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.
Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
signed, Rosguill talk 21:12, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
Thank You
[edit]Hello, Rosguill,
I wanted to thank you for your helpful comments. I wasn't sure when writing this article how to go about it since there are so few sources that mention the game. I used the game Disney's Beauty and the Beast Magical Ballroom as a template since it's another rare game. Thank you for your help to make the article the best it can be.
Chrisisreed (talk) 19:14, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
The article Cinematic (Parque Warner) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Does not meet WP:GNG, sources provided are PR or WP:ROUTINE coverage in Europa Press (which I'm not sure should be considered RS). I wasn't able to find anything else in English or Spanish online
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. signed, Rosguill talk 05:04, 7 January 2019 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Parque Warner Cinematic logo.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:Parque Warner Cinematic logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:29, 15 January 2019 (UTC)
